skip to main content
10.1145/1810959.1810972acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adding one edge to planar graphs makes crossing number hard

Published:13 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

A graph is near-planar if it can be obtained from a planar graph by adding an edge. We show that it is NP-hard to compute the crossing number of near-planar graphs. The main idea in the reduction is to consider the problem of simultaneously drawing two planar graphs inside a disk, with some of its vertices fixed at the boundary of the disk. This approach can be used to prove hardness of some other geometric problems. As an interesting consequence we obtain a new, geometric proof of NP-completeness of the crossing number problem, even when restricted to cubic graphs. This resolves a question of Hlinený.

References

  1. K. J. Borozky, J. Pach, and G. Toth. Planar crossing numbers of graphs embeddable in another surface. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 17(5):1005--1016, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Cabello and B. Mohar. Crossing and weighted crossing number of near-planar graphs. Algorithmica, accepted. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-009-9357-5. Preliminary version in Graph Drawing 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Chimani and P. Hlinený. Approximating the crossing number of graphs embeddable in any orientable surface. In Proc. SODA 2010, to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Chimani, P. Hlinený, and P. Mutzel. Vertex insertion approximates the crossing number for apex graphs. Manuscript available at http://www.fi.muni.cz/~hlineny/Research/papers/. Preliminary version in Graph Drawing 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H. Djidjev and I. Vrto. Planar crossing numbers of genus g graphs. In ICALP 2006, volume 4051 of LNCS, pages 419--430, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Crossing number is NP-complete. SIAM J. Alg. Discr. Meth., 4:312--316, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Grohe. Computing crossing numbers in quadratic time. In Proc. STOC 2001, pages 231--236, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Gutwenger, P. Mutzel, and R. Weiskircher. Inserting an edge into a planar graph. Algorithmica, 41:289--308, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P. Hlinený. Crossing number is hard for cubic graphs. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B, 96(4):455--471, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Hlinený and G. Salazar. On the crossing number of almost planar graphs. In M. Kaufmann and D. Wagner, editors, GD 2006, volume 4372 of LNCS, pages 162--173. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Hlinený and G. Salazar. Approximating the crossing number of toroidal graphs. In T. Tokuyama, editor, ISAAC 2007, volume 4835 of LNCS, pages 148--159, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K.-I. Kawarabayashi and B. Reed. Computing crossing number in linear time. In Proc. STOC 2007, pages 382--390, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. B. Mohar. On the crossing number of almost planar graphs. Informatica, 30:301--303, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. J. Pelsmajer, M. Schaefer, and D. Štefankovic. Crossing number of graphs with rotation systems. Algorithmica, accepted. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-009-9343-y.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Riskin. The crossing number of a cubic plane polyhedral map plus an edge. Studia Sci. Math. Hungar., 31:405--413, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Werner. On the complexity of the planar edge-disjoint paths problem with terminals on the outer boundary. Combinatorica, 29(1):121--126, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Adding one edge to planar graphs makes crossing number hard

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SoCG '10: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual symposium on Computational geometry
        June 2010
        452 pages
        ISBN:9781450300162
        DOI:10.1145/1810959

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 June 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader