ABSTRACT
Implementing wireless sensor networks present new challenges compared with theoretical networks. In addition, results derived from the implementation might differ from theoretical results. Moreover, some routing protocols when implemented might fail to perform. In this paper, we implement three routing protocols namely: Dynamic MANET On-demand, Collection Tree and Dissemination Protocols using a TELOSB sensor network. Our aim is to compare their performances. To demonstrate the pros and cons of these protocols, several performance metrics are carried out. True sensors' readings are measured for future use in our simulation experiments.
- E. Shakshuki, H. Malik, T. Sheltami "Lessons Learned: Simulation Vs WSN Deployment," The IEEE 23rd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA-09), pp. 580--587, Bradford, UK, May 26--29, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- TinyOs, http://www.tinyos.net/Google Scholar
- TinyNode, http://www.tinynode.com/Google Scholar
- Contiki, http://www.sics.se/contiki/Google Scholar
- tinyos-1.x, http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-1.x/doc/Google Scholar
- tinyos-2.x, http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/docGoogle Scholar
- I. Chakeres, E. Belding-Royer, and C. Perkins, "Dynamic MANET On-demand (DYMO) Routing," draft version 04, IETF, Mar. 2006.Google Scholar
- I. D. Chakeres and J. P. Macker. Mobile ad hoc networking and the ietf. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., 10(3):79--81, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Fonseca, O. Gnawali, K. Jamieson, S. Kim, P. Levis, and A. Woo, "The collection tree protocol (ctp)," TEP 123, TinyOS Network Working Group, Aug. 2006.Google Scholar
- "The Collection Tree Protocol (CTP)", http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/html/tep123.html.Google Scholar
- Y. Yu, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin, "Geographical and energy aware routing: a recursive data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks,"UCLA Computer Science Department Technical Report, Tech. Rep. UCLA/CSD-TR-01-0023, 2001.Google Scholar
- "Dissemination", http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/html/tep118.html.Google Scholar
- T. Bokareva, N. Bulusu, and S. Jha, "A performance comparison of data dissemination protocols for wireless sensor networks," in IEEE Globecom Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks Workshop, 2004.Google Scholar
- TelosB, http://www.xbow.com/Products/Product_pdf_files/Wireless_pdf/TelosB_Datasheet.pdfGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Performance evaluation of TELOSB sensor network
Recommendations
A web-based application of TELOSB sensor network
Sensor network can be used in a numerous number of applications. However, implementing wireless sensor networks present new challenges compared with theoretical networks. In addition, implementing a sensor network might provide results different from ...
Performance evaluation of the 6LoWPAN protocol on MICAz and TelosB motes
PM2HW2N '09: Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Performance monitoring and measurement of heterogeneous wireless and wired networksFor wireless sensor networks to reach their full potential they need to be able to interoperate with external IPv6 based networks. This can be achieved using the light-weight 6LoWPAN (IPv6 over Low power Wireless Personal Area Networks) communications ...
Performance evaluation of AODV & DSR for wireless sensor networks
ICCOM'06: Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS international conference on CommunicationsThis paper evaluates the performance of two prominent on-demand routing protocols, which are Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) for wireless sensor networks. Results obtained from simulations demonstrates ...
Comments