skip to main content
10.1145/1830761.1830844acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

An experimental study on robust parameter settings

Published:07 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

That there is no best initial parameter setting for a metaheuristic on all optimization problems is a proven fact (no free lunch theorem). This paper studies the applicability of so called robust parameter settings for combinatorial optimization problems. Design of Experiments supported parameter screening had been carried out, analyzing a discrete Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm on three demographically very dissimilar instances of the Traveling Salesmen Problem. First experimental results indicate that parameter settings produce varying performance quality for the three instances. The robust parameter setting is outperformed in two out of three cases. The results are even significantly worse when considering quality/time trade-off. A methodology for problem generalization is referred to as a possible solution.

References

  1. T. Bartz-Beielstein, C. Lasarczyk, and M. Preuss. Sequential parameter optimization. volume 1, pages 773--780, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. H.-. Beyer and B. Sendhoff. Robust optimization - a comprehensive survey. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196(33-34):3190--3218, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Cunkas and M. Y. Özsaglam. A comparative study on particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms for traveling salesman problems. Cybernetics and Systems, 40(6):490--507, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Dobslaw. A parameter tuning framework for metaheuristics based on design of experiments and artificial neural networks. In Proceedings of ICCMNC 2010, (Rome, Italy, Apr 28 - April 30, 2010), April 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Eiben, R. Hinterding, and Z. Michalewicz. Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(2):124--141, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Eriksson, E. Johansson, C. Kettaneh-Wold, and S. W. Wold. Design of Experiments, Principles and Applications. MKS Umetrics AB, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. J. Grefenstette. Optimization of control parameters for genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 16(1):122--128, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. F. Hutter, H. H. Hoos, K. Leyton-Brown, and T. Stützle. Paramils: An automatic algorithm configuration framework. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 36:267--306, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Jones, M. Schonlau, and W.J. Welch. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. Journal of Global Optimization, 13(4):455--492, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. W. A. D. Landgraaf, A. E. Eiben, and V. Nannen. Parameter calibration using meta-algorithms. pages 71--78, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Marczyk. Stochastic multidisciplinary improvement: beyond optimization. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA-200-4929:1--7, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sacks, J. Schiller, S. B., and W. J. Welch. Designs for computer experiments. Technometrics, 31(1):41--47, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. K.-P. Wang, L. Huang, C.-G. Zhou, and W. Pang. Particle swarm optimization for traveling salesman problem. volume 3, pages 1583--1585, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. H. Wolpert and W. G. Macready. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1):67--82, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An experimental study on robust parameter settings

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '10: Proceedings of the 12th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
      July 2010
      1496 pages
      ISBN:9781450300735
      DOI:10.1145/1830761

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 July 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader