skip to main content
10.1145/1832838.1832849acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschinzConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

StudySieve: a tool that supports constructive evaluation for free-response questions

Published:08 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

StudySieve is an online tool in which students create and share assessment questions with their peers. The submitted questions can be answered, and all answers are visible to the entire community. Both the questions and answers are evaluated by students in a double-blind peer review process. This pedagogy, known as constructive evaluation, has been previously studied in the context of multiple-choice questions. The StudySieve tool described here, supports the construction and evaluation of free-response questions.

References

  1. Arthur, N. Using student-generated assessment items to enhance teamwork, feedback and the learning process. Synergy, 24:21--23, 2006. www.itl.usyd.edu.au/synergy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barak, M., and Rafaeli, S. On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61:84--103, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Denny, P., Hanks, B., and Simon, B. Peerwise: replication study of a student-collaborative self-testing web service in a U.S. setting. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 421--425, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, 2010. ACM, New York, NY Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., and Hamer, J. Student use of the PeerWise system. In ITICSE '08: Proceedings of the 13th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 73--77, Madrid, Spain, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., and Hamer, J., and Purchase, H. Coverage of course topics in a student generated mcq repository. In ITiCSE '09: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 11--15, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. King, A. Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27:664--687, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Luxton-Reilly, A. A systematic review of tools that support peer assessment. Computer Science Education, 19:209--232, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Luxton-Reilly, A., and Denny, P. Constructive evaluation: a pedagogy of student-contributed assessment. Computer Science Education, 2010. In Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., and Chapman, S. Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2):181--221, Summer 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Topping, K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3):249--276, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Webb, N. Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13:21--39, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wilson, E. V. Examnet asynchronous learning network: augmenting face-to-face courses with student-developed exam questions. Computers & Education, 42(1):87--107, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yu, F.-Y., Liu, Y.-H., and Chan, T.-W. A web-based learning system for question posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4):337--348, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. StudySieve: a tool that supports constructive evaluation for free-response questions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CHINZ '10: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the NZ Chapter of the ACM Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction
      July 2010
      95 pages
      ISBN:9781450301046
      DOI:10.1145/1832838

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 July 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate8of23submissions,35%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader