skip to main content
10.1145/1835698.1835785acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bayesian ignorance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We quantify the effect of Bayesian ignorance by comparing the social cost obtained in a Bayesian game by agents with local views to the expected social cost of agents having global views. Both benevolent agents, whose goal is to minimize the social cost, and selfish agents, aiming at minimizing their own individual costs, are considered. When dealing with selfish agents, we consider both best and worst equilibria outcomes. While our model is general, most of our results concern the setting of network cost sharing (NCS) games. We provide tight asymptotic results on the effect of Bayesian ignorance in directed and undirected NCS games with benevolent and selfish agents. Among our findings we expose the counter-intuitive phenomenon that "gnorance is bliss": Bayesian ignorance may substantially improve the social cost of selfish agents. We also prove that public random bits can replace the knowledge of the common prior in attempt to bound the effect of Bayesian ignorance in settings with benevolent agents. Together, our work initiates the study of the effects of local vs. global views on the social cost of agents in Bayesian contexts.

References

  1. S. Albers. On the Value of Coordination in Network Design. SIAM J. Comput. (SICOMP), 38(6):2273--2302, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Alon and Y. Azar. On-line Steiner trees in the Euclidean plane. In Proc. of the 8th Symp. on Computational Geometry (SoCG), pages 337--343, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Andelman, M. Feldman, and Y. Mansour. Strong Price of Anarchy. In Proc. ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Anshelevich, A. Dasgupta, J. M. Kleinberg, É. Tardos, T. Wexler, and T. Roughgarden. The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. SIAM J. Comput. (SICOMP), 38(4):1602--1623, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. I. Ashlagi, D. Monderer, and M. Tennenholtz. Two-Terminal Routing Games with Unknown Active Players. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 173(15):1441--1455, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. L. Chen, and T. Roughgarden. Network design with weighted players. In Proc. ACM Symp. on Parallel Algorithms and Architecture (SPAA), pages 29--38, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Fakcharoenphol, S. Rao, and K. Talwar. A tight bound on approximating arbitrary metrics by tree metrics. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. (JCSS), 69(3):485--497, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. I. Gilboa, and E. Lehrer. The Value of Information - An Axiomatic Approach. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 20: 443--459, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Gupta. Steiner points in tree metrics don't (really) help. In Proc. of the 12th ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 220--227, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R.A. Howard. Information value theory. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 2: 22--26, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Imase and B. M. Waxman. Dynamic Steiner tree problem. SIAM J. Discrete Math. (SIDMA), 4(3):369--384, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. E. Koutsoupias, and C. H. Papadimitriou. Worst-case equilibria. In Proc. 16th Symp. Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. H. Papadimitriou. Algorithms, games, and the Internet. In Proc. 33rd Symp. Theory of Computing (STOC), 749--753, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. W. Rosenthal. The network equilibrium problem in integers. Networks, 3(1):53--59, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Bayesian ignorance

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PODC '10: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing
      July 2010
      494 pages
      ISBN:9781605588889
      DOI:10.1145/1835698

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 July 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate740of2,477submissions,30%

      Upcoming Conference

      PODC '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader