skip to main content
10.1145/1835804.1835854acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DUST: a generalized notion of similarity between uncertain time series

Published:25 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Large-scale sensor deployments and an increased use of privacy-preserving transformations have led to an increasing interest in mining uncertain time series data. Traditional distance measures such as Euclidean distance or dynamic time warping are not always effective for analyzing uncertain time series data. Recently, some measures have been proposed to account for uncertainty in time series data. However, we show in this paper that their applicability is limited. In specific, these approaches do not provide an intuitive way to compare two uncertain time series and do not easily accommodate multiple error functions.

In this paper, we provide a theoretical framework that generalizes the notion of similarity between uncertain time series. Secondly, we propose DUST, a novel distance measure that accommodates uncertainty and degenerates to the Euclidean distance when the distance is large compared to the error. We provide an extensive experimental validation of our approach for the following applications: classification, top-k motif search, and top-k nearest-neighbor queries.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

kdd2010_sarangi_dust_01.mov

mov

131.5 MB

References

  1. C. C. Aggarwal and P. S. Yu. A framework for clustering uncertain data streams. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. C. Aggarwal and P. S. Yu. A survey of uncertain data algorithms and applications. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(5):609--623, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Assfalg, H. Kriegel, P. Kroeger, and M. Renz. Probabilistic similarity search for uncertain time series. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. J. Berndt and J. Clifford. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In Proceedings of the 1994 AAAI Workshop, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Braff and C. Shively. A method of over bounding ground based augmentation system (gbas) heavy tail error distributions. Journal of Navigation, 58(1):83--103, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. Cho. Bidirectional data aggregation scheme for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Ciarlini and U. Maniscalco. Mixture of soft sensors for monitoring air ambient parameters. In Proceedings of the XVIII IMEKO World Congress, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Ding, G. Trajcevski, P. Scheuermann, X. Wang, and E. Keogh. Querying and mining of time series data: experimental comparison of representations and distance measures. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 1(2):1542--1552, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Faloutsos, M. Ranganathan, and Y. Manolopoulos. Fast subsequence matching in time-series databases. SIGMOD Record, 23(2):419--429, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. R. Jeffery, M. Garofalakis, and M. J. Franklin. Adaptive cleaning for rfid data streams. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Databases, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. E. Keogh, J. Lin, and W. Truppel. Clustering of time series subsequences is meaningless: Implications for previous and future research. Knowledge and Information Systems, 8(2), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E. Keogh, X. Xi, L. Wei, and C. A. Ratanamahatana. The ucr time series classification/clustering homepage. www.cs.ucr.edu/~eamonn/time_series_data, Accessed on Feb 5th 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Lin, E. J. Keogh, L. Wei, and S. Lonardi. Experiencing sax: a novel symbolic representation of time series. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 15(2):107--144, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Mueen, E. J. Keogh, Q. Zhu, S. Cash, and B. Westover. Exact discovery of time series motifs. In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. V. R. Nageswara. Algorithms for fusion of multiple sensors having unknown error distributions. In Proceedings of the 15th Symposium on Energy Engineering Sciences, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nature Publishing Group. Bone marrow transplantation. www.nature.com/bmt/journal/v31/ n8/fig_tab/1703917f2.html, Accessed on Feb 5th 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Palit. Signal extraction from multiple noisy sensors. Signal Processing, 61(3):199--212, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. D. Sarma, O. Benjelloun, A. Halevy, S. Nabar, and J. Widom. Representing uncertain data: Models, properties, and algorithms. The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, 18(5), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Sharma, L. Golubchick, and R. Govindam. On the prevalence of sensor faults in real-world deployments. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. Sudano. Dynamic real-time sensor performance evaluation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Fusion, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. Yeh, K. Wu, P. S. Yu, and M. Chen. Proud: A probabilistic approach to processing similarity queries over uncertain data streams. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. DUST: a generalized notion of similarity between uncertain time series

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '10: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      July 2010
      1240 pages
      ISBN:9781450300551
      DOI:10.1145/1835804

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 July 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader