skip to main content
10.1145/1836248.1836254acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapgvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating the effectiveness of visualization techniques for schematic diagrams in maintenance tasks

Published:23 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to perform daily maintenance and repair tasks in complex electrical and mechanical systems, technicians commonly utilize a large number of diagrams and documents detailing system properties in both electronic and print formats. In electronic document views, users typically are only provided with traditional pan and zoom features; however, recent advances in information visualization and illustrative rendering styles should allow users to analyze documents in a more timely and accurate fashion. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of rendering techniques focusing on methods of document/diagram highlighting, distortion, and navigation while preserving contextual information between related diagrams. We utilize our previously developed interactive visualization system (SDViz) for technical diagrams for a series of quantitative studies and an in-field evaluation of the system in terms of usability and usefulness. In the quantitative studies, subjects perform small tasks that are similar to actual maintenance work while using tools provided by our system. First, the effects of highlighting within a diagram and between multiple diagrams are evaluated. Second, we analyze the value of preserving highlighting as well as spatial information when switching between related diagrams, and then we present the effectiveness of distortion within a diagram. Finally, we discuss a field study of the system and report the results of our findings.

References

  1. Agrawala, M., Phan, D., Heiser, J., Haymaker, J., Klingner, J., Hanrahan, P., and Tversky, B. 2003. Designing effective step-by-step assembly instructions. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 828--837. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barnard, Y., and Reiss, M. 2006. User-centred innovation of electronic documentation for maintenance. In Developments in Human Factors in Transportation, Design and Evaluation, 129--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnard, Y., Reiss, M., and Mazoyer, P. 2006. Mental models of users of aircraft maintenance documentation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, 232--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Pier, K., Buxton, W., and DeRose, T. D. 1993. Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface. In SIGGRAPH '93: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Carpendale, S., Ligh, J., and Pattison, E. 2004. Achieving higher magnification in context. In UIST '04: Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Farrar, M. S. 1996. Magic Squares. BookSurge Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferwerda, J., Rushmeier, H., and Watson, B., 2002. Visualization 2002 tutorial: Pschychometrics 101: How to design, conduct, and analyze perceptual studies of computer graphics visualization techniques.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gabbard, J. L., Hix, D., and Swan, J. E. 1999. User-centered design and evaluation of virtual environments. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 19, 6, 51--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Greenberg, S., and Buxton, B. 2008. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Healey, C. G. 2001. Combining Perception and Impressionist Techniques for Nonphotorealistic Visualization of Multidimensional Data. In Non-Photorelistic Rendering in Scientific Visualization, C. G. Healey, Ed., SIGGRAPH 2001 Course Notes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Heiser, J., Tversky, B., Agrawala, M., and Hanrahan, P. 2003. Cognitive design principles for visualizations: Revealing and instantiating. In CogSci '03: Proceedings of 25th annual meeting of the cognitive science society, 545--550.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Heiser, J., Phan, D., Agrawala, M., Tversky, B., and Hanrahan, P. 2004. Identification and validation of cognitive design principles for automated generation of assembly instructions. In AVI '04: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, ACM, 311--319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jackson, C. D., Acevedo, D., Laidlaw, D. H., Drury, F., Vote, E., and Keefe, D. 2003. Designer-critiqued comparison of 2d vector visualization methods: a pilot study. In SIGGRAPH '03: ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Sketches & Applications, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Johnson, C., and Hansen, C. 2004. Visualization Handbook. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Laskowski, S., and Plaisant, C. 2005. Evaluation methodologies for visual analytics. In Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics, J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook, Eds. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 150--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 22, 140, 1--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. North, C. 2006. Toward measuring insight. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 3, 6--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Plaisant, C., Fekete, J. D., and Grinstein, G. 2008. Promoting insight-based evaluation of visualizations: From contest to benchmark repository. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 1 (January), 120--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Plaisant, C., Grinstein, G., Scholtz, J., Whiting, M., O'Connell, T., Laskowski, S., Chien, L., Tat, A., Wright, W., Görg, C., Liu, Z., Parekh, N., Singhal, K., and Stasko, J. 2008. Evaluating visual analytics at the 2007 vast symposium contest. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 28, 2 (March), 12--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rauschenbach, U., Jeschke, S., and Schumann, H. 2001. General rectangular fisheye views for 2d graphics. Elsevier Science, vol. 24, 609--617.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rauschenbach, U. 1999. The rectangular fish eye view as an efficient method for the transmission and display of large images. In ICIP '99: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 115--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Reuter, L. H., Tukey, P., Maloney, L. T., Pani, J. R., and Smith, S. 1990. Human perception and visualization. In VIS '90: Proceedings of the 1st conference on Visualization '90, 401--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Scholtz, J. 2006. Beyond usability: Evaluation aspects of visual analytic environments. In IEEE Symposium onf Visual Analytics Science And Technology, 145--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tory, M., and Möller, T. 2005. Evaluating visualizations: Do expert reviews work? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25, 5, 8--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ware, C. 2004. Information Visualization: Perception for Design, vol. 2nd edition. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Woo, I., Kim, S., Maciejewski, R., Ebert, D. S., Ropp, T. D., and Thomas, K. 2009. Sdviz: A context-preserving interactive visualization system for technical diagrams. Computer Graphics Forum 28, 943--950.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating the effectiveness of visualization techniques for schematic diagrams in maintenance tasks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        APGV '10: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization
        July 2010
        171 pages
        ISBN:9781450302487
        DOI:10.1145/1836248

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 July 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate19of33submissions,58%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader