skip to main content
10.1145/1837274.1837374acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Frequency domain decomposition of layouts for double dipole lithography

Published:13 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Double Dipole Lithography (DDL) uses a combination of X and Y dipole exposures to achieve extreme off-axis illumination for both vertical and horizontal orientations. DDL requires decomposition of a given layout into two set of patterns for the respective dipole exposures. In this work, we propose a frequency domain decomposition flow for DDL. Our experiments show that the proposed frequency domain method not only eliminates the inherent ambiguity of the spatial rule-based flows but it also produces contours that exhibit significantly improved pattern fidelity across lithographic dose and focus variation.

References

  1. N. Dongseok et al., "Patterning 220nm Pitch DRAM Patterns by using Double Mask Exposure", SPIE, vol. 4000, pp. 283--292, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. D. Hsu et al., "Dipole Decomposition Mask-Design for Full-Chip Implementation at the 100nm Technology Node and Beyond", SPIE, vol. 4691, pp. 476--490, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. D. Hsu et al., "65-nm Full-Chip Implementation using Double Dipole Lithography", SPIE, vol. 5040, pp. 215--231, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Maenhoudt et al., "Double Patterning Scheme for Sub-0.25 k1 Single Damascene Structures at NA=0.75, λ=193nm", SPIE, vol. 5757, pp. 1508--1518, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Dusa et al., "Pitch Doubling through Double Patterning Lithography Challenges in Integration and Litho Budgets", SPIE, vol. 6520, pp. 65200G, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. D. Hsu et al., "Double Exposure Technique for 45nm and Beyond", SPIE, vol. 5992, pp. 59921Q, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Burkhardt et al., "Dark Field Double Dipole Lithography for Back-end-of-line Processes", SPIE, vol. 6520, pp. 65200K, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. D. Hsu et al., "Dark Field Double Dipole Lithography (DDL) for 45nm and Beyond", SPIE, vol. 6283, pp. 62830U, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Eurlings et al., "Experimental Verification of a Model Based Decomposition Method for Double Dipole Lithography", SPIE, vol. 5377, pp. 1225--1236, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. A. Torres, F. Schellenberg, and O. Toublan, "Model Assisted Double Dipole Decomposition", SPIE, vol. 4691, pp. 401--417, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. V. Postnikov et al., "Assessment for Complementary Double Dipole Lithography for 45 nm and 32 nm Technologies", SPIE, vol. 5754, pp. 1478--1484, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Burkhardt et al., "Overcoming the Challenges of 22-nm Node Patterning through Litho-Design Co-optimization", SPIE, vol. 7274, pp. 727404, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Y. Borodovsky, W-H. Cheng, R. Schenker, and V. Singh, "Pixilated Phase Mask as Novel Lithography RET", SPIE, vol. 6924, pp. 69240E, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Y. Granik, "Fast Pixel Based Mask Optimization for Inverse Lithography", J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst., vol. 5(4), pp. 043002, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Liebmann et al., "Reducing DfM to Practice: the Lithography Manufacturability Assessor", SPIE, vol. 6156, pp. 61560K, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Frequency domain decomposition of layouts for double dipole lithography

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DAC '10: Proceedings of the 47th Design Automation Conference
      June 2010
      1036 pages
      ISBN:9781450300025
      DOI:10.1145/1837274

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      DAC '24
      61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
      June 23 - 27, 2024
      San Francisco , CA , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader