skip to main content
10.1145/1840845.1840877acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesislpedConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Real-energy: a new framework and a case study to evaluate power-aware real-time scheduling algorithms

Published:18 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the past decades, many algorithms with the goal of achieving energy efficiency have been proposed for scheduling real-time tasks. Due to a lack of a unified testing framework, most of them were evaluated via simulations under their own experimental scenarios. However, finding their performance in real processors is essential if these algorithms are to be used in practice. In this paper, we design a unified framework to evaluate power-aware scheduling algorithms based on a real Intel PXA255 XScale processor, and present a case study to compare several key algorithms using DVS/Shut-Down. The energy efficiency and the quantitative difference in their performance as well as the practical issues found in the implementation of these algorithms are discussed. Our experiments show a gap between the theoretical results and the real results. Our framework not only gives researchers a tool to evaluate their system designs, but also helps them to bridge this gap in their future works.

References

  1. W. Kim, D. Shin, H-S. Yun, J. Kim and S. L. Min. Performance Comparison of Dynamic Voltage Scaling Algorithms for Hard Real-Time Systems. In Proceedings of the Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Intel StrongARM SA-1110 Microprocessor Developer's Manual.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Intel PXA255 Processor Developer's Manual. www.xscale-freak.com/XSDoc/PXA255/27869302.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Snowdon, S. Ruocco and G. Heiser. Power Management and Dynamic Voltage Scaling: Myths and Facts. In Proceedings of the 2005 Workshop on Power Aware Real-time Computing, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Miyoshi, C. Lefurgy, E. V. Hensbergen, R. Rajamony and R. Rajkumar. Critical Power Slope: Understanding the Runtime Effects of Frequency Scaling. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM International Conference on Supercomputing, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Weissel and F. Bellosa. Process Cruise Control: Event-Driven Clock Scaling for Dynamic Power Management. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Compilers, Architechture and Synthesis for Embedded Systems (CASE 2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. RTAI, www.rtai.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Aydin, R. Melhem, D. Mosse and P. Mejia-Alvarez. Dynamic and Aggressive Scheduling Techniques for Power-Aware Real-Time Systems. In Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Pillai and K. G. Shin. Real-Time Dynamic Voltage Scaling for Low Power Embedded Operating Systems. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Shin, K. Choi and K. Sakurai. Power Optimization of Real-Time Embedded Systems on Variable Speed Processors. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Lee, K. P. Reddy, and C. M. Krishna. Scheduling Techniques for Reducing Leakage Power in Hard Real-Time Systems. In Proceedings of the EcuroMicro Conference on Real Time Systems (ECRTS), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Jejruikar and P. K. Gupta. Procrastination Scheduling in Fixed Priority Real-Time Systems. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED Conference on Languages, Compilers and Tools for Embedded Systems, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. Jekruikar and P. K. Gupta. Dynamic Slack Reclamation with Procrstination Scheduling in Real-Time Embedded Systems. In Proceedings of ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Jekruikar, C. Pereira and P. K. Gupta. Leakage Aware Dynamic Voltage Scaling for Real-Time Embedded Systems. In Proceedings of ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. I. Lee, J. Leung and S. Son. Handbook of Real-Time and Embedded Systems. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. F. Yao, A. Demers, and S. Shenker. A scheduling model for reduced cpu energy. In AFCS, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Real-energy: a new framework and a case study to evaluate power-aware real-time scheduling algorithms

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ISLPED '10: Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE international symposium on Low power electronics and design
        August 2010
        458 pages
        ISBN:9781450301466
        DOI:10.1145/1840845

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 August 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,159submissions,34%

        Upcoming Conference

        ISLPED '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader