ABSTRACT
We examine the impact of individuals' religious and political affiliations on the conflict resolution strategies they employ. Participants in the U.S., Israel, and Qatar played the interactive computer game, PeaceMaker [15], with the objective of satisfying constituents on both sides of the Israel-Palestine conflict. In the role of the Palestinian President, we find that participants tended to take actions favoring those constituents with whom they shared cultural affiliation. Oppositely, when playing the role of the Israeli Prime Minister, participants exhibited comparatively greater bias toward constituents with whom they did not share cultural affiliation. We interpret this difference in light of minority-majority group membership, and the assertion of in-group interests versus perspective-taking of out-group interests. Finally, we discuss the potential of interactive computer games to study cross-cultural interaction in other dynamic environments characterized by uncertainty and complex interdependencies.
- Agnew, R. Foundation for a general strain theory. Criminology, 30, 1 (1992), 47--87.Google Scholar
- Atran, S., Axelrod, R., and Davis, R. Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science, 317 (2007), 1039--1040.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U., and Fehr, E. Parochial altruism in humans. Nature, 442, 7105 (2006), 912--915.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brewer, M.B. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 2 (1979), 307--324.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cehajic, S., Brown, R., and González, R. What do I care? Perceived ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 12 (2009), 715--729.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., and Saguy, T. Commonality and the complexity of 'we': Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3 (2009), 3--20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dubin, R. Deviant behavior and social structure: Continuities in social theory. American Sociological Review, 24, 2 (1959), 147--163.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Durkheim, E. On the normality of crime. In Parsons, T., Shils, E., Naegele, K., and Pitts, J. (eds.), Theories of Society: 872--875. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
- Goette, L., Huffman, D., and Meier, S. The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups. American Economic Review, 96, 2 (2006), 212--216.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gonzalez, C., and Czlonka, L. Games for peace: Empirical investigations with PeaceMaker. In Cannon-Bowers, J., and Bowers, C. (eds.), Serious Game Design and Development: Technologies for Training and Learning: 134--149. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2010.Google Scholar
- Gonzalez, C., and Saner, L.D. Thinking or feeling? Effects of decision making personality in conflict resolution. In Brinken, J.V., Konietzny, H., and Meadows, M. (eds.), Emotional Gaming. In press.Google Scholar
- Gonzalez, C., Vanyukov, P., and Martin, M.K.. The Use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making. Computers in Human Behavior, 21 (2005), 273--286.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Halevy, N., Bornstein, G., and Sagiv, L. 'In-group love' and 'out-group hate' as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict -- A new game paradigm. Psychological Science, 19, 4 (2008), 405--411.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Halperin, E., Bar-Tal, D., Sharvit, K., Rosler, N., and Raviv, A. Socio-psychological implications for an occupying society: The case of Israel. Journal of Peace Research, 47 (2010), 59--70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ImpactGames. PeaceMaker {Computer Software}. Pittsburgh, PA (http://www.peacemakergame.com/), 2006.Google Scholar
- Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., and Nosek, B.A. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 6 (2004), 881--919.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kelman, H.C. Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57 (2006), 1--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kelman, H.C. The interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian national identities: The role of the other in existential conflicts. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 3 (1999), 581--600.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kelman, H.C. The political psychology of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: How can we overcome the barriers to a negotiated solution? Political Psychology, 8, 3 (1987), 347--36.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leach, C.W., Iyer, A., and Pedersen, A. Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32 (2006), 1232--1245.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Merton, R.K. Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 5 (1938), 672--682.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mi'Ari, M. Attitudes of Palestinians toward normalization with Israel. Journal of Peace Research, 36 (1999), 339--348.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robinson, R.J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., and Ross, L. Actual versus assumed differences in construal: 'Naive realism' in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 3 (1995), 404--417.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roccas, S., Klar, Y., and Liviatan, I. The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (2006), 698--711.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sidanius, J., and Pratto, F. The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In Sniderman, P.M., Tetlock, P.E., and Carmines, E.G. (eds.), Prejudice, Politics, and the American Dilemma: 173--211. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
- Smooha, S. Israel: Pluralism and Conflict. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.Google Scholar
- Smooha, S. Arabs and Jews in Israel: Change and Continuity in Mutual Intolerance. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1992.Google Scholar
- Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., and Pyszczynski, T. A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In Zanna, M.E.P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 91--159. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1991.Google Scholar
- Stern, J. Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill. New York: HarperCollins, 2003.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33 (1982), 1--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tarrant, M., Dazeley, S., and Cottom, T. Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48 (2009), 427--446.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Turner, J.C. Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 1 (1975), 5--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The cultural determinants of strategic bias: a study of conflict resolution in an interactive computer game
Recommendations
Cultural differences in dynamic decision-making strategies in a non-linear, time-delayed task
People in every culture must deal with time and the uncertainties of the future. This study investigates how people in five countries make decisions in the dynamic simulation COLDSTORE with its non-linear time development (Reichert & Dorner, 1988). We ...
Cultural Identity Restoration and Purposive Website Design: A Hermeneutic Study of the Chickasaw and Klamath Tribes
HICSS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesIn this paper, we employ a hermeneutic approach to examine the question: How do cultural productions of websites enable enactments of power, change, and society in Native American groups? We collected longitudinal data from 15 redesigns of the Chickasaw ...
Locating the self between national and global
How does one begin to define the global identity? How does globalization offers a sense of identity, a sense of belonging, to an individual, in particular a non-westerner? Has globalization given a new identity to the erstwhile-colonized subject, who ...
Comments