skip to main content
research-article

The task-dependent effect of tags and ratings on social media access

Published:23 November 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Recently, online social networks have emerged that allow people to share their multimedia files, retrieve interesting content, and discover like-minded people. These systems often provide the possibility to annotate the content with tags and ratings.

Using a random walk through the social annotation graph, we have combined these annotations into a retrieval model that effectively balances the personal preferences and opinions of like-minded users into a single relevance ranking for either content, tags, or people. We use this model to identify the influence of different annotation methods and system design aspects on common ranking tasks in social content systems.

Our results show that a combination of rating and tagging information can improve tasks like search and recommendation. The optimal influence of both sources on the ranking is highly dependent on the retrieval task and system design. Results on content search and tag suggestion indicate that the profile created by a user's annotations can be used effectively to adapt the ranking to personal preferences. The random walk reduces sparsity problems by smoothly integrating indirectly related concepts in the relevance ranking, which is especially valuable for cold-start users or individual tagging systems like YouTube and Flickr.

References

  1. Amer-Yahia, S., Benedikt, M., and Bohannon, P. 2007. Challenges in searching online communities. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 30, 2, 23--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao, S., Xue, G., Wu, X., Yu, Y., Fei, B., and Su, Z. 2007. Optimizing Web search using social annotations. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). ACM Press, New York, NY, 501--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barabási, A.-L. 2005. The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature 435, 7039, 207--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Begelman, G., Keller, P., and Smadja, F. 2006. Automated tag clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space. In Proceedings of the Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop (WWW).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Breese, J. S., Heckerman, D., and Kadie, C. 1998. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Clements, M., de Vries, A., and Reinders, M. J. T. 2009a. Exploiting positive and negative graded relevance assessments for content recommendation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Algorithms and Models for the Web-Graph (WWW). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 155--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Clements, M., de Vries, A. P., and Reinders, M. J. T. 2008. Detecting synonyms in social tagging systems to improve content retrieval. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR). ACM, New York, NY, 739--740. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Clements, M., de Vries, A. P., and Reinders, M. J. T. 2009b. The influence of personalization on tag query length in social media search. Inform. Process. Manag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Craswell, N. and Szummer, M. 2007. Random walks on the click graph. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, NY, 239--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fouss, F., Pirotte, A., Renders, J.-M., and Saerens, M. 2007. Random-walk computation of similarities between nodes of a graph with application to collaborative recommendation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 19, 3, 355--369. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Funk, S. 2006. http://sifter.org/~simon/journal/20061211.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., and Dumais, S. T. 1987. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Comm. ACM 30, 11, 964--971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Goldberg, K., Roeder, T., Gupta, D., and Perkins, C. 2001. Eigentaste: A constant time collaborative filtering algorithm. Inform. Retr. 4, 2, 133--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Golder, S. A. and Huberman, B. A. 2006. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J. Inform. Sci. 32, 2, 198--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Halpin, H., Robu, V., and Shepherd, H. 2007. The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). ACM, New York, NY, 211--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. 2002. An empirical analysis of design choices in neighborhood-based collaborative filtering algorithms. Inform. Retr. 5, 4, 287--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Herlocker, J. L. and Konstan, J. A. 2001. Content-independent task-focused recommendation. IEEE Internet Comput. 5, 6, 40--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., and Stumme, G. 2006. Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking. In Proceedings of the Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4011, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 411--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Huang, Z., Chen, H., and Zeng, D. 2004. Applying associative retrieval techniques to alleviate the sparsity problem in collaborative filtering. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 22, 1, 116--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Järvelin, K. and Kekäläinen, J. 2002. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 20, 4, 422--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jäschke, R., Marinho, L., Hotho, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L., and Stumme, G. 2007. Tag recommendations in folksonomies. In Proceedings of the Conferenece on Knowledge Discovery in Databases (PKDD). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4702, Springer Berlin, 506--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kaser, O. and Lemire, D. 2007. Tag-cloud drawing: Algorithms for cloud visualization. In Proceedings of the Tagging and Metadata for Social Information Organization Workshop (WWW).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lambiotte, R. and Ausloos, M. 2006. Collaborative tagging as a tripartite network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3993, 1114--1117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Liben-Nowell, D. and Kleinberg, J. 2003. The link prediction problem for social networks. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information and knowledge Management (CIKM). ACM, New York, NY, 556--559. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lipczak, M. 2008. Tag recommendation for folksonomies oriented towards individual users. In Proceedings of European Conference on Machine Learning and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML PKDD) Discovery Challenge (RSDC08). 84--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu, N. N. and Yang, Q. 2008. Eigenrank: A ranking-oriented approach to collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR). ACM, New York, NY, 83--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., and Davis, M. 2006. Ht06, tagging paper, taxonomy, flickr, academic article, to read. In Proceedings of the 17th conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HYPERTEXT). ACM Press, New York, NY, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mika, P. 2005. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. Y. Gil, E. Motta, R. V. Benjamins, and M. Musen, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3729, 522--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Mirza, B. J., Keller, B. J., and Ramakrishnan, N. 2003. Studying recommendation algorithms by graph analysis. J. Intell. Inform. Syst. 20, 2, 131--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., and Winograd, T. 1998. The Pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the Web. Tech. rep., Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramakrishnan, N., Keller, B. J., Mirza, B. J., Grama, A. Y., and Karypis, G. 2001. Privacy risks in recommender systems. IEEE Internet Comput. 5, 6, 54--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Resnick, P. and Varian, H. R. 1997. Recommender systems. Comm. ACM 40, 3, 56--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Salton, G. and Buckley, C. 1988. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inform. Proc. Manag. 24, 5, 513--523. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J. 2000. Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender systems—a case study. In Proceedings of the ACM WebKDD Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Schenkel, R., Crecelius, T., Kacimi, M., Michel, S., Neumann, T., Parreira, J. X., and Weikum, G. 2008. Efficient top-k querying over social-tagging networks. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, NY, 523--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sen, S., Lam, S. K., Rashid, A. M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., Harper, F. M., and Riedl, J. 2006. Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, New York, NY, 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Smyth, B. and Balfe, E. 2006. Anonymous personalization in collaborative Web search. Inform. Retrieval 9, 2, 165--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Song, Y., Zhuang, Z., Li, H., Zhao, Q., Li, J., Lee, W. C., and Giles, C. L. 2008. Real-time automatic tag recommendation. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, NY, 515--522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Symeonidis, P., Nanopoulos, A., and Manolopoulos, Y. 2008. Tag recommendations based on tensor dimensionality reduction. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys). ACM, New York, NY, 43--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Szummer, M. and Jaakkola, T. 2001. Partially labeled classification with Markov random walks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). Vol. 14. MIT Press, 945--952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Tatu, M., Srikanth, M., and D'Silva, T. 2008. Tag recommendations using bookmark content. In Proceedings of ECML PKDD Discovery Challenge (RSDC). 96--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Vander Wal, T. 2005. Explaining and showing broad and narrow folksonomies. http://www.vanderwal.net/random/entrysel.php?blog=1635.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang, J., de Vries, A. P., and Reinders, M. J. T. 2006a. Unifying user-based and item-based collaborative filtering approaches by similarity fusion. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, New York, NY, 501--508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Wang, X., Sun, J.-T., Chen, Z., and Zhai, C. 2006b. Latent semantic analysis for multiple-type interrelated data objects. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM Press, New York, NY, 236--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Wilcoxon, F. 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bull. 1, 6, 80--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Xi, W., Fox, E. A., Fan, W., Zhang, B., Chen, Z., Yan, J., and Zhuang, D. 2005. Simfusion: measuring similarity using unified relationship matrix. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, NY, 130--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Xu, Z., Fu, Y., Mao, J., and Su, D. 2006. Towards the semantic Web: Collaborative tag suggestions. In Proceedings of the Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop (WWW). Edinburgh, Scotland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The task-dependent effect of tags and ratings on social media access

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
              ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 28, Issue 4
              November 2010
              204 pages
              ISSN:1046-8188
              EISSN:1558-2868
              DOI:10.1145/1852102
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2010 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 23 November 2010
              • Accepted: 1 December 2009
              • Revised: 1 July 2009
              • Received: 1 November 2008
              Published in tois Volume 28, Issue 4

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader