skip to main content
10.1145/1852786.1852844acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Is GQM+Strategies really applicable as is to non-software development domains?

Published:16 September 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on the ongoing experience of applying a variant of the GQM+Strategies approach to non-software development domains (e.g., military training domain). However, we found that it is not directly possible to apply the GQM+Strategies approach as is to non-software development domains, but it needs to be generalized, i.e., it needs to be turned into a context free approach. On the other hands, the required adaptations were very a few. Overall, we found so far that, apart from those specific adaptations, the GQM+Strategies approach can be effectively applied to those domains which have the same nature as software development (i.e., human-intensive domains). This practical application of the GQM+Strategies approach shows that the scope of this technology may be much larger than expected with great benefits for the software development industry.

References

  1. Basili, V., Lindvall, M., Regardie, M., Seaman, C., Heidrich, J., Munch, J., Rombach, D., Trendowicz, A., 2010. Linking software Development and Business Strategies through Measurement. Computer (Apr. 2010), 57--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Basili, V., Heidrich, J., Lindvall, M., Munch, J., Regardie, J., Trendowicz, A., 2007. GQM+Strategies -- Aligning Business Strategies with Software Measurement, First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007), pp. 488--490,. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Basili, V., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H. D., 1994. The Experience Factory, In Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Ed. J. J. Marciniak, John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., Jan.-Feb. 1992. The Balanced Scorecard---Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Rev., p. 71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mulazzani, F. Russo, B., Succi, G., 2009. Developing Business Process Monitoring Probes to Enhance Organization Control. In ICEIS 2009 Proceedings - Milan, IT, Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. US Dept. of Defense and US Army, Mar. 2003. Practical Software and Systems Measurement: A Foundation for Objective Project Management, v. 4.0c; www.psmsc.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Is GQM+Strategies really applicable as is to non-software development domains?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ESEM '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
          September 2010
          423 pages
          ISBN:9781450300391
          DOI:10.1145/1852786

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 September 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          ESEM '10 Paper Acceptance Rate30of102submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate130of594submissions,22%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader