skip to main content
10.1145/1858171.1858173acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics

Published:16 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many HCI researchers have recently begun to examine the opportunities to use ICTs to promote environmental sustainability and ecological consciousness on the part of technology users. This paper examines the way that traditional HCI discourse obscures political and cultural contexts of environmental practice that must be part of an effective solution. Research on ecological politics and the political economy of environmentalism highlight some missing elements in contemporary HCI analysis, and suggest some new directions for the relationship between sustainability and HCI. In particular, I propose that questions of scale -- the scales of action and the scales of effects -- might provide a useful new entry point for design practice.

References

  1. Agar, J. 2003. The Government Machine: A Revolutionary History of the Computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Aoki, P., Honicky, R., Mainwaring, A., Myers, C., Paulos, E., Subramanian, S., and Woodruff, A. 2009. A Vehicle for Research: Using Street Sweepers to Explore the Landscape of Environmental Community Action. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2009 (Boston, MA), 375--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlant, L. G. 1997. The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernheim-Brush, A. J., Combs-Turner, T., Smith, M., and Gupta, N. 2004. Scanning Objects in the Wild: Assessing an Object-Triggered Information System. Proc. Intl Conf. Ubiquitous Computing Ubicomp 2004 (Nottingham, England).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Blevis, E. 2007. Sustainable Interaction Design: Invention and Disposal, Renewal and Reuse. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2007 (San Jose, CA), 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bookchin, M. 1990. Post Scarcism Anarchy. Montreal, ON: Black Rose Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowker, G. 2000. Biodiversity Datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 30(5), 643--683.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bowker, G. and Star, S. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Brenner, N. 1998. Between Fixity and Motion: Accumulation, Territorial Organization and the Historical Geography of Spatial Scales. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16, 459--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Brewer, J. and Dourish, P. 2008. Storied Spaces: Cultural Accounts of Mobility, Technology, and Environmental Knowing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 12, 963--976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cooper, G. and Bowers, J. 1995. Representing the User: Notes on the Disciplinary Rhetoric of HCI. In Thomas, P. (ed.), The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Consolvo, S., McDonald, D., Toscos, T., Chen, M., Froehlich, J., Harrison, B., Klasnja, P., LaMarca, A., LeGrand, L., Libby, R., Smith, I., and Landay, J. 2008. Activity Sensing in the Wild: A Field Trial of UbiFit Garden. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2008 (Florence, Italy), 1797--1806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Corburn, J. 2005. Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Cronon, W. 1995. Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. Norton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. DiSalvo, C, Sengers, P., and Brynjarsdottir, H. 2010. Mapping the Landscape of Sustainable HCI. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2010 (Atlanta, GA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for Design. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2006 (Montreal, Canada), 541--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ferguson, J. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Fogg, B. J. 2002. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufman. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., and Landay, J. 2009. UbiGreen: Investigating a Mobile Tool for Tracking and Supporting Green Transportation Habits. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2009 (Boston, MA), 1043--1052. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Harvey, D. 2000. Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang, E. and Truong, K. 2008. Breaking the Disposable Technology Paradigm: Opportunities for Sustainable Interaction Design for Mobile Telephones. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2008 (Florence, Italy), 323--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lewin, K. 1952. Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Tavistock.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis, T. 2008. Transforming Citizens? Green Politics and Ethical Consumption on Lifestyle Television. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 22(2), 227--240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin, J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., and Strub, H. 2006. Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game. Proc. Intl. Conf. Ubiquitous Computing Ubicomp 2006 (Orange County, CA), 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Lukacs, G. 1967. Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat. In History and Class Consciousness. Merlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. McCarthy, J. 2005. Scale, Sovereignty, and Strategy in Environmental Governance. Antipode, 37(4), 731--753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Macnaughton, P. and Urry, J. 1998. Contested Natures. London: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. McCarthy, J. and Prudham, S. 2004. Neoliberal Nature and the Nature of Neoliberalism. Geoforum, 35, 275--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Mainwaring, S., Chang, M., and Anderson, K. 2004. Infrastructures and their Discontents: Implications for Ubicomp. Proc. Intl. Conf. Ubiquitous Computing (Nottingham, UK), 418--432.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mankoff, J., Matthews, D., Fussell, S., and Johnson, M. 2007. Leveraging Social Networks to Motivate Individuals to Reduce their Ecological Footprints, Proceedings of HICSS 2007, 87--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Margolin, V. 2002. The Politics of the Artificial: Essays on Design and Design Studies. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Massey, D. 1993. Power-geometry and a Progressive Sense of Place. In Bird, Curtis, Putnam, Robertson and Tickner (eds), Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, D. and Slater, D. 2001. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Berg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Mol, A. 2002. Ecological Modernization and the Global Economy. Global Environmental Politics, 2(2), 92--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Muller, J. 2002. The Mind and the Market: Capitalism and Western Thought. New York: Anchor Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. O'Connor, J. 1998. Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Paulos, E, Honicky, R., and Hooker, B. 2008. Citizen Science: Enabling Participatory Urbanism. In Foth, M. (ed), Urban Informatics: Community Integration and Implementation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Pepper, D. 2007. Tensions and Dilemmas in Ecotopianism. Environmental Values, 16, 289--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Philip, K. 2003. Civilizing Natures: Race, Resources, and Modernity in Colonial South India. Rutgers University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Pierce, J., Odom, W., and Blevis, E. 2008. Energy Aware Dwelling: A Critical Survey of Interaction Design for Eco-Visualizations. Proc. Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction OZCHI '08 (Cairns, Queensland, Australia). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Proctor, J. 1998. The Social Construction of Nature: Relativist Accusations, Pragmatist and Critical Realist Responses. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(3), 352--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Robbins, P. 2004. Political Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Rose, N. 1989. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Sale, K. 1995. Dwellers in the Land: The Bioregional Vision. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Saunders, L., Hanbury-Tenison, R., and Swingland, R. 2002. Social Capital from Carbon Property: Creating Equity for Indigenous Peoples. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences. 360, 1763--1775.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like A State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Sonnenfeld, D. and Mol, A. 2002. Globalization and the Transformation of Environmental Governance. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(0), 1318--1339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Snow, D., Ruchford, B., Worden, S., and Benford, R. 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Spivak, G. 1987. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. Taylor and Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Staler, A. 1989. Rethinking Colonial Categories: European Communities and the Boundaries of Rule. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31(1), 134--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Tomlinson, B. 2010. Greening through IT. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Tsing, A. 2004. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams, A., Robles, E., and Dourish, P. 2008. Urbaneing the City: Examining and Refining the Assumptions Behind Urban Informatics. In Foth (ed.), Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams, R. 1980. Ideas of Nature. Problems in Materialism and Culture, Williams (ed), 67--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J., and Augustin, S. 2008. A Bright Green Perspective on Sustainable Choices. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2008 (Florence, Italy), 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Woolgar, S. 1991. Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials. In Law (ed), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination, 57--99. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. http://www.nyu.edu/projects/xdesign/feralrobots/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      DIS '10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
      August 2010
      457 pages
      ISBN:9781450301039
      DOI:10.1145/1858171

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 August 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader