skip to main content
10.1145/186281.186308acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Practice makes use: using information technologies before implementation and the effect on acceptance by end users

Published:01 April 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports the results of a study on the effects of practice, a form of on the job training, on the pre-implementation attitudes and on post-implementation use of an information technology. The successful use of information technologies by end users is dependent on many variables including training of end users. Providing support to workers by training them to use information technologies can have positive effects for the implementation process. Training may directly effect workers' attitudes toward the information technologies making it more likely that they will voluntarily and persistently use the technologies. This research found practice before implementation of an electronic mail system in a business setting to be the best predictor of end users' perceptions that the system was easy to use and useful. The results also showed practice to be the best predictor of actual use of the electronic mail system by end users after its implementation. By providing employees the opportunity to practice skills necessary to use information technologies, managers may be making an investment in training that provides high returns in use of information technologies.

References

  1. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., and Todd, P. A. "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication" MIS Quarterly 16(2), June 1992, pp. 227-247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., and Bobko, P. "Content, Causes, and Consequences of Job Insecurity: A Theory-based Measure and Substantive Test. Academy of Management Journal 32(4), December 1989, pp. 803-829.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bikson, T. K. "Understanding the Implementation of Office Technology," in Technology_ and the Transformation of White-Collar Work, R.E. Kraut (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bimbrauer, H. "Technical Training," in Human Resources Management and Development Handbook, W. R. Tracey, (ed.), American Management Association, New York, 1985, pp. 1009-1020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourque, L. B. and Clark, V. A. Processing Data: The Survey Example. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CA, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen, W. "The Puny Payoff From Office Computers," in Computers in the Human Context: Information Technolom/, ProductiviWLand People, T. Forester (ed.), Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, 1989, pp. 267-280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Camevale, A. P. and Goldstein, H. "Schooling and Training for Work in America: An Overview," in New Developments in Worker Training: A: Lega~ for the 1990_____ss," L. A. Ferman, M. Hoyman, J. Cutcher- Gershenfeld, and E. J. Savoie (eds.), Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, WI, 1990, pp. 25-54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Clegg, C. W. "Psychology of employee lateness, absence, and turnover: A methodological critique and an empirical study," Journal of Applied Psychol0~, 68(1), February 1983, pp. 88-101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cohen, W. M. and Leventhal, D. A. "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, March 1990, pp. 128-152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Davis, D. D. Integrating Technological, Manufacturing, Marketing, and Human Resource Strategies," in Mana~ng Technolo~cal Innovation' Organizational Strategies for implementing Advanced Manufacturing Technolo~s, D. D. Davis and Associates (eds.), Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1986, pp. 256-290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, F. D. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, 13(3), September 1989, pp. 319-340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," ~agement Science, 35(8), August 1989, pp. 982-1003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Davis, S. A. and Bostrom, tL P. "Training End Users: An Experimental Investigation of the Roles of the Computer Interface and Training Methods," MIS Quarterly, 17(1), March 1993, pp. 61-85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Electronic Mail Association. The Electronic Mail Advantage: Applications and Benefits. Electronic Mail Association, Arlington, VA, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Elizur, D. and Guttman, L. "The Structure of Attitudes Toward Work and Technological Change Within an Organization," Administrative Science ~erl~, 21, December 1976, pp. 611-622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ettlie, J. E. "Implementing Manufacturing Technologies: Lessons From Experience," in Mana~ng Technolo~cal Innovation: Organizational Strate~,ies for Imt>lementin~ Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, D. D. Davis and Associates (eds.), jossey-Bass Publishers,_ San Francisco, 1986, pp. 72-104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ewusi-Mensah, K. and Przasnyski, Z. H. "On information Systems Project Abandonment: An Exploratory Study of Organizational Practices," MIS Quarterly, 15(1), March 1991, pp. 67-85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Feldman, D. C. "Socialization, Resocialization, and Training: Refraining the Research agenda," in Training and Development in Organizations, I L. Goldstein and Associates (eds.),Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco, 1989, pp. 376-416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fossum, J. A. "New Dimensions in the Design and Delivery of Corporate Traimng Programs," in New Developments in Worker Training: A Legacy_ for the 1990s, L. A. Ferman, M. Hoyman, J. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, and E. J. Savoie (eds.), industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, WI, 1990, pp. 129-156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gattiker, U. E. "Computer Skills Acquisition: A Review and Future Directions for Research," Journal of Management, 18(2), 1992, pp. 547-574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ginzberg, M. J. "Early Diagnosis of MIS implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions," Management Science, 27(4), April 1981, pp. 459478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Goodman, P. S., Griffith, T. L., and Fenner, D. B. "Understanding Technology and the Individual in an Organizational Context," in Technolomt and Organizations, P. S. Goodman, L. S. Sproull and Associates (eds.), Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1990, pp. 45-86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hackett, E. J., Mirvis, P. H., and Sales, A. L. "Women's and Men's Expectations About the Effects of New Technology at Work," Group and Organization .Stu__dies, 16(1), March 1991, pp. 60-85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hill, T., Smith, N., and Mann, M. "Role of Efficacy Expectations in Predicting the Decision to Use Advanced Technologies: The Case of Computers," Journal of' Applied Psycholo~, 72(2), May 1987, pp. 307-313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Hiltz, S. R. and Johnson, K. "User Satisfaction with Computer-mediated Communication Systems," Management Science, 36(6), June 1990, pp. 739-764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Howard, G. S. and Mendelow, A. L. "Discretionm~ Use of Computers: An Empirically Derived Explanatory Model," Decision Sciences, 22(2), Spring 1991, pp. 241-265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Ives, B. and Olson, M. H. "User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research," Management Science, 30(5), May 1984, pp. 586-603.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jick, T. D. "Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action," Administrative Science u~, 24, December 1979, pp. 602-611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Kleintop, W. A. The Acceptance of New Information Technologies : by End Users, unpubliished doctoral dissertation, School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 1993a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kleintop, W. A. "The Relationship of Pre-implementation Attitude and Insecurity When Implementing New information Technologies," Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Eastern Academy of Management, S. M. Schor (ed.), Providence, RI, May 1993b, pp. 49-52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Laumann, E. O., Nadler, G., and O'Farrell, B. "Designing for Technological Change' People in the Process," Peo_.._9_N_ele and Technolo~ in the Workplace. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 1-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Leonard-Barton, D. and Deschamps, I. "Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology," Manaeeme.nt Scien,~, 34(10), October 1988, pp. 1252- 1265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lewin, K. "Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science," Human Relations, June 1947, pp. 5-41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. London, M. and MacDuffie, J. P. "Technological Innovations: Case Examples and Guidelines," Personnel, 64(I 1), November 1987, pp. 26-38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson, R. R. "Educational Needs as Perceived by IS and End-user Personnelt: A Survey of Knowledge and Skill Requirements," MIS Quarterly, 15(4), December 1991, pp. 503-525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Nie, N. H., C. H. Hull, J. G. Jenkins, K. Steinbrenner, and D. H. Bent. Statisucal Package for the Social Sciences (2nd ed.) McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Parsons, D. K., Liden, R. C., O'Connor, E. l., and Nagao, D. H. "Employee Responses to Technology-driven Change: The Implementation of Office Automation in a Service Organization," Human Relations, 44(12), December 1991, pp. 1331-1356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Raymond, L. "Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success," MIS Oumlerlv, 9(1), March 1985, pp. 37-52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Rice, R. E. "Computer-mediated Communication System Network Data: 'rheoretical Concerns and Empirical Examples," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 32, 1990, pp. 627-647. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Rice, R. E. and Aydin, C. "Attitudes Toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing," Administrative Science Ouarterlv, 36, June 1991, pp. 219- 244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Rice, R. E. and Contractor, N. S. "Conceptualizing Effects of Office Information Systems: A Methodology and Application for the Study of Alpha, Beta, and Gamma Changes. Decision Sciences, 21(2), Spring 1990, pp. 301- 317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Rice, R. E., Grant, A. E., Schmitz, J., and Torobin, J. "Individual and Network Influences on the Adoption and Perceived Outcomes of Electronic Messaging," Social Networks, 12, 1990, pp. 27-55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Robey, D. User attitudes and management information system use. Academy of Management Journal, (22:3), September 1979, pp. 527-538.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson, J. C. "Behavior Modeling Training," in Human Resources Management and Development Handbook, W. R. Tracey (ed.), American Management Association, New York, 1985, pp. 1158-1174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Rothwell, W. J. and Sredl, H. J. Professional Human Resource Development Roles and Competencies, HRD Press, Inc., Amherst, MA, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Stems, H. L. and Doverspike, D. "Aging and the Training Process," in T~aining and Development in Organizations, I. L. Goldstein and Associates (eds.), Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1989, pp. 299-332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Tait, P. and Vessey, I. "The Effect of User Involvement on System Success: A Contingency Approach," MIS ~Quarterly, 12(2), March 1988, pp. 91-106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Weick, K. E. "Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in New Technologies," in Technolo~)? and Organiz,B__ti'0ns, P. 8. Goodman, L. S. Sproull and Associates (eds.), Jossey- Bass Publications, San Francisco, 1990, pp. 144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Zmud, 1L W. "Individual Differences and MIS Success: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Management Science, 25(10), October 1979, pp. 966-979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Zuboff, S. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Practice makes use: using information technologies before implementation and the effect on acceptance by end users

            Recommendations

            Reviews

            James Edward Miller

            “This paper reports the results of a study on the effects of practice on the pre-implementation attitudes, job insecurity of end users, and post-implementation use of an information technology.” The system selected for study was an electronic mail system that was to be installed in a Fortune 500 transportation firm that had found it necessary to replace its existing email system. For this study, “practice” was taken to mean “a form of OJT [on-the-job-training] engaged in at the discretion of the end user with respect to when training occurs, for how long it occurs and which skills are practiced.” The research found that as the amount of practice using an information technology increases, “perceptions of the ease of using the information technology increase above perceptions of ease of use associated with user sociodemographics and experience” and “perceptions of the usefulness of the information technology increase above perceptions of usefulness associated with user sociodemographics and experience.” The study did not find support for either the hypothesis that “end users' pre-implementation attitudes toward the information technology become more positive” or the hypothesis that “end users' job insecurity related to the information technology decrease,” however. The hypothesis that practice would increase use after implementation was supported. It was noted that the positive results reported for practice may have been influenced by both the participants' experiences with the existing email system, which gave them a level of expertise that allowed them to take advantage of practice, and by the long period of time (one month) allocated for practice. The paper is well written, and the extensive references (61) both support the paper and serve as an excellent framework for anyone who is looking into training and acceptance of information technologies.

            Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

            Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGCPR '94: Proceedings of the 1994 computer personnel research conference on Reinventing IS : managing information technology in changing organizations: managing information technology in changing organizations
              April 1994
              319 pages
              ISBN:0897916522
              DOI:10.1145/186281
              • Editor:
              • Jeanne W. Ross

              Copyright © 1994 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 April 1994

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader