skip to main content
10.1145/186281.186332acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Implementing microcomputers in local government: a case study of a loosely structured approach

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 April 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

Microcomputers and microcomputer technology offer ample opportunity for improving the productivity, decision making, and work quality of government. However, if they are not adequately implemented, the opportunities are lost and resources wasted. One purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of a loosely structured implementation approach on various criteria of microcomputer success, including redundancy, opportunism, decision quality, and work quality. Another purpose is to determine whether the loosely structured approach is just a stage in a development toward a more structured strategy, or alternatively, whether the loosely structured technique is an enduring, workable method of implementation. Loosely structured connotes an approach that has both openness and rules, but favors individual choice over formal organizational rules and structure. The loosely structured approach is important to probe because it may be a default choice. It may be used because of lack of knowledge about traditional, formal methods of computer implementation. It may also be a forced, cost containment choice that relies mostly on endusers, supplemented by some professional systems analysis assistance. The research to investigate these issues is a longitudinal case study of a budget office in a large local government that started with a loosely structured style. The period covered included the years 1985 to 1992 with interviews taking place in 1988, 1990 and 1992.

Theoretical premises were drawn from organizational work on loosely coupled systems and evolutionary models of implementing information technology. The findings show that the loosely structured approach initially encouraged and bred opportunism, that is, innovative and useful application of microcomputers by a few, but low or routine use by many. The loosely structured approach gradually gave some ground to a more traditional systems strategy. This entailed assistance from professional information management specialists on more complex connectivity applications and development tasks, as well as planned systems analysis by the budget staff itself. These efforts yielded better data exchanges plus office wide network applications. However, a linear evolution from loosely structured to planned control did not occur, rather, the two intermingled and existed side by side. Overall, the loosely structured approach benefitted the work of the office, but its functionality also derived from the highly professional nature of the staff and the influx of new staff with greater computer knowledge. Continued work is needed to compare different implementation approaches and different work environments in order to advance the implementation of microcomputers and the associated technology, especially as the microcomputer positions itself to become an integral part of organizational information technology in government.

References

  1. Benbsat, I., Goldstein, D., and Mead, M. The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems, MIS Ouarterly, i1(3), September, 1987, pp. 369-388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Galletta, D. and Hufnagel, E. A Model of End-User Computing Policy, ~formation and Management, 22, 1992, pp. 1-18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Gibson, C. and Nolan, R. Managing the Four Stages of EDP Growth, Harvard Business Review, 52, Jan/Feb, 1974, pp. 76-88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gouldner, A. Organizational Analysis, in Socioloav Today. Merton, et. al (eds). Basic Books' NY, 1959, pp. 400- 428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Holloran, J. Achieving World-Class End-User Computing, Information Systems Management, Fall 1993, pp. 7-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Huff, S., Munro, M. and Martin, B. Growth Stages of End User Computing, Communications of the ACM, 31, May 1988, pp. 542-550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Igbaria, M. and Nachman, A. Correlates of User Satisfaction with End User Computing, Information and Management, 19, 1990, pp. 73-82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Thompson, J. Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, NY, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kreamer, K., King, J., Dunkle, D., Lane, J. and George, J. Microcomputer Use and Policy, ICMA, Baseline Data Re~, 17, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. McKenney, J. and McFarlan, F. The Information Archipelago -- Maps and Bridges, Harvard Business Review. 60, Sept/Oct 1982, pp. 109-119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Munro, M. and Huff, S. Managing End User Computing, Journal of Systems Management, December 1988, pp. 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Norris, D. High Tech in City Hall: Use and Effects of Microcomputers in United States Local Governments, Social Science Computer Review, 7, Summer 1988, p. 137-146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Orton, J. and Weick, K. Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization, Academy of Management _Review, 15, 1990, pp. 203-223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Powers, J., Adams, D., and Mills, 14. _Computer Information System Development, Southwest Publishing Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Quade, E.S. Analysis for Public Decisions. American Elservier, NY, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Reynolds, G. Information Systems for Managers. West Publishing Company, NY, 1992: 194-200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rockart, J. and Flannery, L. The Management of End-User Computing, Communications of the ACM, 26, October 1983, pp. 776-784. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Schiffman, S., Meile, L., and Igbaria, M. An Examination of End-User Types, Information and Management, 22, 1992, pp. 207-215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Weber, M. Theory of Social and Economic Oreanization. Free Press, NY, 1947.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Weick, K. The Social Psychology of Organizina. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zuboff, S. In th.e..A..ge of the Smart Machine. Basic Books, New York, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Implementing microcomputers in local government: a case study of a loosely structured approach

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGCPR '94: Proceedings of the 1994 computer personnel research conference on Reinventing IS : managing information technology in changing organizations: managing information technology in changing organizations
              April 1994
              319 pages
              ISBN:0897916522
              DOI:10.1145/186281
              • Editor:
              • Jeanne W. Ross

              Copyright © 1994 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 April 1994

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader