skip to main content
10.1145/1868650.1868683acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesergo-iaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Transformation du travail et accompagnement ergonomique: l'exemple de la restructuration des bureaux de poste

Published:12 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The restructuring of French post offices in "Espace Service Client" -- ESC - ("Customer Service Area"), currently underway, includes multifunction booths, a "store" for postal products and also regional produce, and booths for banking. These structural changes involve a change in work: transforming the organization's usual individual work into a new cooperative work development, managing multiple demands of customers, and learning sales techniques. To better understand the human impact of these changes and the nature of requirements for the personnel of company, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 employees of French Post Office. The results obtained from a discursive analysis and a geometrical data analysis (PCA type) indicate possible trails to promote the reorganization and also to help managing new situations work through an ergonomic support.

References

  1. Mollard, R., Wolff, M. & Gibert, A. 2010. Transformation du travail et préévention des risques: aménagement des espaces d'activités et conception des postes de travail dans les bureaux de Poste. In Actes de la conférence Ergo'IA (Biarritz, France, October, 13 15, 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barthe, B. & Quééinnec, Y. 1999. Terminologie et perspectives d'analyse du travail collectif en Ergonomie. L'année Psychologique, 99(4), 663--668. Leplat, J. 1993. Ergonomie et activités collectives. In Les aspects collectifs du travail, F. Six, & X. Vaxevanoglou Eds. Octarèès. Toulouse, France, 7--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Barthe, B. 2003. Élaboration, mise en æuvre et apport classificatoire d'un cadre d'analyse des aspects collectifs du travail. In Modèles et pratiques de l'analyse du travail: 1988--2003, 15 ans d'évolution. XXXVIIIème Congrès de la SELF (Paris, Sept. 03).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Oakland, J. S., & Tanner, S. 2007. Successful Change Management. Total Quality Management, 18, 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dobson, D. M. Big change programmes: Increasing the likelihood of success. 2000. Journal of Change Management, 2(1), 7--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghiglione, R., Blanchet, A. 1993. Analyse de contenus et contenus d'analyse. Dunod, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sulman, J., Savage, D., Vrooman, P., & McGillivray, M. 2004. Social Group Work: Building a Professional Collective of Hospital Social Workers. Social Work in Health Care, 39(3), 287--307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hager, P. & Johnson, M. C. 2009. Working outside the comfort of competence in a correction centre: toward collective competence. Human Resource Development International, 12(5), 493--509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cuvelier, L., & Caroly, S. 2009. Appropriation d'une stratéégie opératoire: un enjeu du collectif de travail. Activités, 6(2), 57--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Caroly, S. 2002. Différences de gestion collective des situations critiques dans les activités de service selon deux types d'organisation du travail. Pistes, 4(1), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sullivan, W., Sullivan, R., & Buffton, B. 2001. Aligning individual and organisational values to support change. Journal of Change Management, 2(3), 247--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Carapiet, S., & Harris, H. 2007. Role of self-organisation in facilitating adaptative organisation: a proposed index for the ability to self-organise. Production Planning & Control, 18(6), 466--474.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Länsisalmi, H., Peiró, J. M., & Kivimääki, M. 2000. Collective stress and coping in the context of organizational culture. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(4), 527--559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ghiglione, R., Landré, A., Bromberg, M., & Molette, P. Analyse automatique des contenus. Dunod, Paris, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H. 2004. Geometric Data Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wolff, M. 2003. Apports de l'analyse géométrique des données pour l'analyse de l'activité. In Formalismes de modélisation pour l'analyse du travail et l'ergonomie, J.-C. Sperandio & M. Wolff Eds. PUF, Paris, 195--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wolff, M., Burkhardt, J. M., & De la Garza C. 2005. Analyse exploratoire de «« points de vue »: une contribution pour outiller les processus de conception. Le Travail Humain, 68, 3, 253--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Wolff, M., Gattegno, M. P., & Adrien, J.-L. 2009. Rôôle et avenir du psychologue superviseur français pour l'accompagnement de personnes avec autisme. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie (RQP), 30(3), 143--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolff, M., Gattegno, M. P., & Adrien, J.-L. 2005. Un modèèle des accompagnants de personnes avec autisme: pour la valorisation de la profession. Handicap: revue des sciences humaines et sociales, 105--106, 51--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Vermersch, P. 2003. L'entretien d'explicitation. (4ème édition). ESF, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Transformation du travail et accompagnement ergonomique: l'exemple de la restructuration des bureaux de poste

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Ergo'IA '10: Proceedings of the Ergonomie et Informatique Avancee Conference
      October 2010
      254 pages
      ISBN:9781450302739
      DOI:10.1145/1868650

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 October 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader