skip to main content
10.1145/1871437.1871737acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

A study of rumor control strategies on social networks

Published:26 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we study and evaluate rumor-like methods for combating the spread of rumors on a social network. We model rumor spread as a diffusion process on a network and suggest the use of an "anti-rumor" process similar to the rumor process. We study two natural models by which these anti-rumors may arise. The main metrics we study are the belief time, i.e., the duration for which a person believes the rumor to be true and point of decline, i.e., point after which anti-rumor process dominates the rumor process. We evaluate our methods by simulating rumor spread and anti-rumor spread on a data set derived from the social networking site Twitter and on a synthetic network generated according to the Watts and Strogatz model. We find that the lifetime of a rumor increases if the delay in detecting it increases, and the relationship is at least linear. Further our findings show that coupling the detection and anti-rumor strategy by embedding agents in the network, we call them beacons, is an effective means of fighting the spread of rumor, even if these beacons do not share information.

References

  1. C. Castellano, D. Vilone, and A. Vespignani. Incomplete ordering of the voter model on small-world networks. Europhys. Lett., 63(1):153, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. Donovan. How idle is idle talk? one hundred years of rumor research. Diogenes, 213:59--82, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In KDD '03: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 137--146. ACM, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Merck-Article. Polio vaccination fears, 2003. Science in Africa: Africa's First On-Line Science Magazine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. M. Mizell and L. M. Sander. A generalized voter model on complex networks. J. Statist. Phys., 136(1):59--71, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. Thompson, R. C. Estrada, D. Daugherty, and A. Clintron-Arias. A deterministic approach to the spread of rumors. Technical report, Mathematical and Theoretical Biology, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Turner. Disasters, Collective Behavior and Social Organization, chapter Rumors as intensified information seeking: Earthquake rumors in China and the United States, pages 244--256. University of Delaware Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of small-world' networks. Nature, 393(6684):440--442, June 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. H. Zanette. Dynamics of rumor propagation on small-world networks. Phys. Rev. E, 65(4), Mar 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A study of rumor control strategies on social networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '10: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
        October 2010
        2036 pages
        ISBN:9781450300995
        DOI:10.1145/1871437

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 October 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader