skip to main content
10.1145/1871985.1871996acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterization of the twitter @replies network: are user ties social or topical?

Published:30 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, social media services have become a global phenomenon on the Internet. The popularity of these services provides an opportunity to study the characteristics of online social networks and the communities that emerge in them. This paper presents an analysis of the users' interactions in the implicit network derived from tweet replies of a specific dataset obtained from a popular micro-blogging service, Twitter. We analyze the influence of the topics of the tweet messages on the interaction among users, to determine if the social aspect prevails over the topic in the moment of interaction. Thus, the main goal of this paper is to investigate if people selectively choose whom to reply to based on the topic or, otherwise, if they reply to anyone about anything. We found that the social aspect predominantly conditions users' interactions. For users with larger and denser ego-centric networks, we observed a slight tendency for separating their connections depending on the topics discussed.

References

  1. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:993--1022, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Boyd, S. Golder, and G. Lotan. Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In HICSS-43, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. Gerlof. Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. In Chiarcos Eckart de Castilho & Stede, From Form to Meaning: Processing Texts Automatically, page 3140. Proc. of the Biennial GSCL Conference, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Gilbert and K. Karahalios. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proc. of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 211--220, Boston, MA, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. A. Golder, D. M. Wilkinson, and B. A. Huberman. Rhythms of social interaction: Messaging within a massive online network. Proc. 3rd Intl. Conf. on Communities and Technologies, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proc. of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, pages 56--65, San Jose, CA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Joachims. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In Proceedings of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 137--142, Chemnitz, DE, 1998. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, DE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Kumar, J. Novak, and A. Tomkins. Structure and evolution of online social networks. In Proc. of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 611--617, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In WWW '10: Proc. of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 591--600, New York, NY, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Mislove, M. Marcon, K. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In IMC '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pages 29--42, San Diego, CA, USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Moricz, Y. Dosbayev, and M. Berlyant. PYMK: friend recommendation at myspace. In Proc. of the 2010 International Conference on Management of Data, pages 999--1002, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. O. Phelan, K. McCarthy, and B. Smyth. Using twitter to recommend real-time topical news. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 385--388, New York, NY, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Scott. Social Networks Analysis: a handbook. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2nd edition, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Viswanath, A. Mislove, M. Cha, and K. P. Gummadi. On the evolution of user interaction in facebook. In Proc. of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks, pages 37--42, Barcelona, Spain, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1st edition, Nov. 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Weng, E. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 261--270, New York, NY, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Zhao and M. B. Rosson. How and why people twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proc. of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, pages 243--252, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Characterization of the twitter @replies network: are user ties social or topical?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SMUC '10: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Search and mining user-generated contents
          October 2010
          136 pages
          ISBN:9781450303866
          DOI:10.1145/1871985

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 October 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SMUC '10 Paper Acceptance Rate15of25submissions,60%Overall Acceptance Rate15of25submissions,60%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader