ABSTRACT
The concept of Web 2.0 becomes prevalent and popular in the past few years. People are able to share and manage their own resources in Web 2.0 Systems. The abundance of Web 2.0 resources in various media formats calls for better resource integration, intending to enrich user experience in both browsing and searching. Though the Web 2.0 resources are shown in various modalities, their tags act as an intuitive medium to connect resources together. However, tagging is by nature an ad hoc activity. They do often contain noises and are affected by the subjective inclination of taggers. Consequently, linking resources simply by tags will not be reliable. In this paper, we propose an effective approach for linking tagged resources to concepts extracted from Wikipedia, which has become a fairly reliable reference over the last few years. Compared to the tags, the concepts are therefore of higher quality. Empirical experiments were conducted, and the results validate the effectiveness of our framework.
- S. Cronen-Townsend, Y. Zhou, and W. B. Croft. Predicting query performance. SIGIR, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Liu, X.-S. Hua, L. Yang, M. Wang, and H.-J. Zhang. Tag ranking. WWW, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Magalhaes, F. Ciravegna, and S. M. Ruger. Exploring multimedia in a keyword space. MM, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. N. Milne and I. H. Witten. An effective, low-cost measure of semantic relatedness obtained from wikipedia links. WIKIAI, 2008.Google Scholar
- B. Sigurbjornsson and R. van Zwol. Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. WWW, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Tonkin and M. Guy. Folksonomies: Tidying up tags? Journal D-Lib, 2006.Google Scholar
- Z. Xu, Y. Fu, J. Mao, and D. Su. Towards the semantic web: Collaborative tag suggestions. WWW, Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop, 2006.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Integrating web 2.0 resources by wikipedia
Recommendations
Web 2.0 Toolbar: Providing Web 2.0 Services for Existence Web Pages
APSCC '08: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing ConferenceSince the term “Web 2.0” appears, a new generation of Web is coming. There are many technical articles referring to how to design a Web 2.0 website. However, the traditional Web 1.0 websites are still multitudinous currently. The developers of the ...
A comparative analysis of user-generated and author-generated metadata for web resources
ASIS&T '10: Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem - Volume 47In this paper, we investigate the difference between metadata generated by users and authors. Delicious tags and HTML keyword META tags associated with the same set of web pages on topics related to semantic web are collected, forming two datasets (i.e.,...
Web 2.0 proxy: upgrading websites from web 1.0 to web 2.0
Since the term "Web 2.0" appears, a new generation of Web is coming. There are many articles referring to how to design a Web 2.0 website. However, the traditional Web 1.0 websites are still multitudinous currently. The developers of the traditional Web ...
Comments