skip to main content
research-article

The limits of systems-making organizations

Published: 27 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

This paper provides an ontology of organizational structures intended for software-intensive systems-making. An archetype is presented and scaled in stages to support larger, more complex projects. Artifacts at each stage are identified and analyzed. The first artifact analyzed is the engine of scaling, specialization. Organizations that have been scaled for the purpose of developing large complex systems will be shown to themselves become large and complex, in part for matching the problem to be solved but also for self-management. Specialization first occurs with the separation of the role of designer into designers and managers whereby the designer's role and activities can be abstracted into a limited set of objects to be manipulated by managers. Design is transformed into a model of design. The problem (or challenge) for managers is of normalization of dysfunction, whereby the model becomes both mistaken for and more valued than the object modeled. The result of having transformed essential roles and activities into objects in a hierarchical organization will be shown to (one) increase the positive effects on managing large-scale organizations, (two) increase the negative effects on design outcomes and (three) prevent the logical association of item one with item two. Disassociations incurred through specialization and normalization of dysfunction will be shown to be counter-productive in that they create and sustain high process but low sense organizations. Conclusions will be presented on the nature of large organizations, on the nature of their risk evaluations, and on the inevitability of dysfunctions and pathologies to lead not only to project failure but also to immediately forget the same

References

[1]
Adams, Scott, "If you blog about how lame we are, you're fired", September 13, 2010 http://dilbert.com/strips/2010-09-13/
[2]
Adams, Scott, "Your accomplishments hare suspiciously hard to verify", April 7, 2010 http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2010-04-07/
[3]
Adams, Scott, "What's he been reading?", June 9, 2010 http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2010-06-09/
[4]
Adams, Scott, "Now I'm doing your job, too", August 28, 2010 http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2010-08-28/
[5]
April, Ben, Feike Hacquebord, Rainer Link, "A Cybercrime Hub", Trend Micro, August 2009 http://us.trendmicro.com/imperia/md/content/us/trendwatch/researchandanalysis/atcybercrimethub.pdf
[6]
Bauman, Zygmunt, Modernity and the Holocaust, Cornell University Press, http://books.google.com/books?id=wxDw7y0l0mYC&printsec=frontcover&d q=modernity+and+the+holocaust&hl=en&ei=hgJ9TMaSFYP6lweY68i1Cg&sa= X&oi=booktresult&ct=result&resnum=1&ved+0CCgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q &f=false (Does Godwin's law apply?)
[7]
Brooks, Jr., Frederick P., The Design of Design, Addison-Wesley, 2010.
[8]
Carney, Dana R., "Ideas at Work: Powerful Lies", Columbia Business School, January 22, 2010 http://www4.gsb.columbia.edu/ideasatwork/feature/735403/Powerful+Lies
[9]
Desai, Sreehari, Arthur Brief, Jennifer George, "When Executives Rake in Millions: Meanness in Organization", 23rd Annual International Association of Conflict Management Conference, Boston, MA, June 24-27, 2010 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstracttid=1612486
[10]
Grier, David Alan, "The Age of Accountability", Computer, IEEE, Vol. 43, No. 5, May 2010, pp 6--8.
[11]
Finkle, Jim, "Perks and paintball: life inside a global cybercrime ring", PCPRO, March 25, 2010 http://www.pcpro.co.uk/features/356737/perks-and-paintball-life-inside-a-global-cybercrime-ring
[12]
Hudson, Gene, "Unidentified Hazard: Organizational Culture as a Prerequisite to System Safety", Journal of System Safety, Vol. 46, No. 3, May-June 2010 http://www.system-safety.org/ejss/past/current/spotlight2tp1.php
[13]
Kanich, Chris, Christian Kreibich, Kirill Levchenko, Brandon Enright, Geoffrey M. Voelker, Vern Paxson, Stephan Savage, "Spamalytics: An Empirical Analysis of Spam Marketing Conversion", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 52, No. 9, September 2009, pp. 99--107, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1562164.1562190
[14]
Keohane, Joe, "How facts backfire", Sunday Boston Globe, July 11, 2010, pp. C1, C4 http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/07/11/howtfactstbackfire/
[15]
Kruger, Justin, David Dunning, "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 77, No 6., December 1999, pp. 1121--1134 (Published Online December 2009, http://www.scirp.org/journal/psych)
[16]
MacKinnon, Rebecca, "Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission: China's Information Control Practices and the Implications for the United States", June 30, 2010 http://rconversation.blogs.com/files/rmtuscctfinal.pdf
[17]
Parkinson, C. Northcote, Parkinson's Laws, Buccaneer Books, 1957
[18]
Phillips, Joseph, IT Project Management, McGraw Hill, 2010.
[19]
Carroll Quigley, The Evolution of Civilizations, Liberty Fund, 1979 http://www.archive.org/details/CarrollQuigley-TheEvolutionOfCivilizations-AnIntroductionTo (Noticing patterns where none exist, or genius?)
[20]
Schaefer, Robert, "A Critical Programmer Searches For Professionalism", SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, ACM, Volume 31 Issue 4, July 2006.
[21]
Schaefer, Robert, "The Grand Theory of Everything: What Man-made Systems Are, and Why They Fail", Software Engineering Notes, ACM Press, Volume 32 Issue 4, July 2007.
[22]
Schaefer, Robert, "A Systems Analysis of Systems Integration", Software Engineering Notes, ACM Press, Volume 33 Issue 1, January 2008.
[23]
Schaefer, Robert, "Debugging Debugged, a Metaphysical Manifesto of Systems Integration", Software Engineering Notes, ACM Press, Volume 33 Issue 3, May 2008.
[24]
Schaefer, Robert, "Software Maturity: Design as Dark Art", Software Engineering Notes, ACM Press, Volume 34 Issue 1, January 2009.
[25]
Seife, Charles, Proofiness, Viking 2010
[26]
Surowiecki, James, "The Financial Page: The Regulation Crisis", The New Yorker, June 14 & 21, 2010.
[27]
Wikipedia Contributors, "Dunning-Kruger effect", Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, June 28, 2010, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Krugerteffect
[28]
Wikipedia Contributors, "Hazing", Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, May 3, 2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazing
[29]
Wikipedia Contributors, "Peter Principle", Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, July 8, 2010, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PetertPrinciple
[30]
Wikipedia Contributors, "Stockholm Syndrome", Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, May 4, 2010, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholmtsyndrome
[31]
Wing, Mike, "Burt Doesn't Manage", Software Engineering Notes, ACM Press, Volume 35, Number 4, July 2010, pp. 4--6

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes  Volume 35, Issue 6
November 2010
132 pages
ISSN:0163-5948
DOI:10.1145/1874391
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 November 2010
Published in SIGSOFT Volume 35, Issue 6

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. dysfunction Zeroth order organization
  2. project organization
  3. scaling
  4. systems-making

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 184
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media