ABSTRACT
Automatic feature selection is a critical step towards the generation of successful computational models of affect. This paper presents a genetic search-based feature selection method which is developed as a global-search algorithm for improving the accuracy of the affective models built. The method is tested and compared against sequential forward feature selection and random search in a dataset derived from a game survey experiment which contains bimodal input features (physiological and gameplay) and expressed pairwise preferences of affect. Results suggest that the proposed method is capable of picking subsets of features that generate more accurate affective models.
- C. Busso, Z. Deng, S. Yildirim, M. Bulut, C. Lee, A. Kazemzadeh, S. Lee, U. Neumann, and S. Narayanan. Analysis of emotion recognition using facial expressions, speech and multimodal information. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Multimodal interfaces, pages 205--211. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Fairclough. Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interacting with computers, 21(1--2):133--145, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Fürnkranz and E. Hüllermeier. Preference learning. Künstliche Intelligenz, 19(1):60--61, 2005.Google Scholar
- D. Goldberg. Genetic Algorithms in Search and Optimization. Addison-wesley, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Haapalainen, P. Laurinen, H. Junno, L. Tuovinen, and J. Röning. Methods for classifying spot welding processes: A comparative study of performance. Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence, pages 412--421, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. He, M. Lech, N. Maddage, and N. Allen. Stress and emotion recognition using log-Gabor filter analysis of speech spectrograms. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, 2009. ACII 2009. 3rd International Conference on, pages 1--6, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Hudlicka. Affective game engines: motivation and requirements. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, pages 299--306. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Jain and D. Zongker. Feature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 19(2):153--158, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Kim, S. Bang, and S. Kim. Emotion recognition system using short-term monitoring of physiological signals. Medical and biological engineering and computing, 42(3):419--427, 2004.Google Scholar
- R. Mandryk, K. Inkpen, and T. Calvert. Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2):141--158, 2006.Google Scholar
- H. P. Martinez, K. Hullett, and G. N. Yannakakis. Extending Neuro-evolution Preference Learning through Player Modeling. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), Copenhagen, Denmark, August 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. P. Martinez, A. Jhala, and G. N. Yannakakis. Analyzing the Impact of Camera Viewpoint on Player Psychophysiology. In Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pages 394--399, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 2009. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. McQuiggan, S. Lee, and J. Lester. Predicting user physiological response for interactive environments: an inductive approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd Artificial Intelligence for Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference, pages 60--65, 2006.Google Scholar
- C. Pedersen, J. Togelius, and G. Yannakakis. Modeling Player Experience for Content Creation. Narrative, 12:13, 2010.Google Scholar
- R. Picard, E. Vyzas, and J. Healey. Toward machine emotional intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, pages 1175--1191, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Rani, N. Sarkar, and C. Liu. Maintaining optimal challenge in computer games through real-time physiological feedback. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pages 184--192, 2005.Google Scholar
- J. Togelius, T. Schaul, J. Schmidhuber, and F. Gomez. Countering poisonous inputs with memetic neuroevolution. In Parallel Problem Solving From Nature 10, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Ververidis and C. Kotropoulos. Automatic speech classification to five emotional states based on gender information. Proc. Eusipco, Vienna, pages 341--344, 2004.Google Scholar
- G. Yannakakis and J. Hallam. Game and player feature selection for entertainment capture. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG 2007), 2007.Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. N. Yannakakis. Preference Learning for Affective Modeling. In Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII09), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Genetic search feature selection for affective modeling: a case study on reported preferences
Recommendations
A new local search based hybrid genetic algorithm for feature selection
This paper presents a new hybrid genetic algorithm (HGA) for feature selection (FS), called as HGAFS. The vital aspect of this algorithm is the selection of salient feature subset within a reduced size. HGAFS incorporates a new local search operation ...
Comparative Study of Classification Models with Genetic Search Based Feature Selection Technique
Feature selection plays a very important role to retrieve the relevant features from datasets and computationally improves the performance of a model. The objective of this study is to evaluate the most important features of a chronic kidney disease CKD ...
A genetic algorithm-based method for feature subset selection
As a commonly used technique in data preprocessing, feature selection selects a subset of informative attributes or variables to build models describing data. By removing redundant and irrelevant or noise features, feature selection can improve the ...
Comments