ABSTRACT
Automation in maritime container terminals is gaining momentum as the advantages in terms of productivity and costs have become apparent. Automated container terminals differ from manual ones by robotized vehicles transporting the containers instead of man-driven vehicles. The design of an automated container terminal remains a daunting task due to the large solution space. In previous work, we introduced the multiple worlds concept to support the design of complex systems. By applying the multiple worlds formalism on the case of automated container terminals, we are able to explore the large solution space in a structured way and have the ability to select the most robust design. In order to use the concept however, a specific component library has to be developed that can be used in a multiple worlds environment. This component library has different abstraction levels that can be used throughout the design process. During the design process, different alternatives are explored by going from a high abstracted model to a more concrete model. At the end of the design process, different concrete models are available. From these concrete models, a thorough selection can be made to finally maintain the most robust design. In this paper, the concept will be discussed and the component library will be presented.
- {Ashby, 1962} Ashby, W. (1962). Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
- {Diaz-Calderon et al., 2000} Diaz-Calderon, A., Paredis, C., and Khosla, P. (2000). Reconfigurable models: A modeling paradigm to support simulation-based design. In Proceedings of SCS 2000 Summer Computer Simulation Conference. The Society for Computer Simulation International.Google Scholar
- {Fumarola et al., 2010a} Fumarola, M., Seck, M., and Verbraeck, A. (2010a). A DEVS component library for simulation-based design of automated container terminals. In Proceedings of the 3rd International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques. Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {Fumarola et al., 2010b} Fumarola, M., Seck, M., and Verbraeck, A. (2010b). Multipleworlds: A formalism for simulation based design. In Proceedings of SCS 2010 Summer Computer Simulation Conference. The Society for Computer Simulation International.Google Scholar
- {Hu et al., 2005} Hu, X., Zeigler, B., and Mittal, S. (2005). Variable structure in devs component-based modeling and simulation. Simulation, 81(2):91--102. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {Liu et al., 2004} Liu, C.-I., Jula, H., Vukadinovic, K., and Ioannou, P. (2004). Automated guided vehicle system for two container yard layouts. Transportation Research. Part C, Emerging technologies, 12(5):349--368.Google Scholar
- {Medeiros et al., 2000} Medeiros, D., Traband, M., Tribble, A., Lepro, R., Fast, K., and Williams, D. (2000). Simulation based design for a shipyard manufacturing process. In Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, pages 1411--1414. Winter Simulation Conference Board of Directors. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {Ottjes et al., 2006} Ottjes, J., Veeke, H., Duinkerken, M., Rijsenbrij, J., and Lodewijks, G. (2006). Simulation of a multiterminal system for container handling. OR Spectrum, 28(4):447--468.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {Pielage, 2005} Pielage, B.-J. (2005). Conceptual Design of Automated Freight Transport Systems: Methodology and Practice. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
- {Saanen, 2004} Saanen, Y. (2004). An approach for designing robotized marine container terminals. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
- {Simon, 1977} Simon, H. (1977). The New Science of Management Decision. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {Steenken et al., 2004} Steenken, D., Voß, S., and Stahlbock, R. (2004). Container terminal operation and operations research - a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum, 26(1):3--49.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {Veenstra et al., 2004} Veenstra, A., Lang, N., and van den Rakt, B. (2004). Economic analysis of a container terminal simulation. International Journal of Logistics, 7(3):263--279.Google ScholarCross Ref
- {Vis, 2002} Vis, I. F. A. (2002). Planning and control concepts for material handling systems. PhD thesis, University of Rotterdam.Google Scholar
- {Zeigler and Hammond, 2007} Zeigler, B. P. and Hammond, P. E. (2007). Modeling & Simulation-based Data Engineering: Introducing Pragmatics Into Ontologies For Netcentric Information Exchange. Academic Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {Zeigler and Praehofer, 2000} Zeigler, B. P. and Praehofer, H. (2000). Theory of Modeling and Simulation. Academic Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Automated container transport system between inland port and terminals
In this article we propose a new concept called automated container transportation system between inland port and terminals (ACTIPOT) which involves the use of automated trucks to transfer containers between an inland port and container terminals. The ...
Scheduling of Different Automated Yard Crane Systems at Container Terminals
In this work, different variants of a branch-and-bound procedure for yard crane scheduling at seaport container terminals and their effect on the terminal's performance are studied. In particular, this work investigates the level of detail needed to ...
A DEVS component library for simulation-based design of automated container terminals
SIMUTools '10: Proceedings of the 3rd International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and TechniquesModeling and simulation in design processes is traditionally used during the analysis of the future system. However, simulation-based design allows the use of modeling and simulation throughout the synthesis phase which offers greater flexibility to ...
Comments