skip to main content
10.1145/1878537.1878601acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspringsimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supporting the design of automated container terminals with the multiple worlds concept

Published:11 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Automation in maritime container terminals is gaining momentum as the advantages in terms of productivity and costs have become apparent. Automated container terminals differ from manual ones by robotized vehicles transporting the containers instead of man-driven vehicles. The design of an automated container terminal remains a daunting task due to the large solution space. In previous work, we introduced the multiple worlds concept to support the design of complex systems. By applying the multiple worlds formalism on the case of automated container terminals, we are able to explore the large solution space in a structured way and have the ability to select the most robust design. In order to use the concept however, a specific component library has to be developed that can be used in a multiple worlds environment. This component library has different abstraction levels that can be used throughout the design process. During the design process, different alternatives are explored by going from a high abstracted model to a more concrete model. At the end of the design process, different concrete models are available. From these concrete models, a thorough selection can be made to finally maintain the most robust design. In this paper, the concept will be discussed and the component library will be presented.

References

  1. {Ashby, 1962} Ashby, W. (1962). Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. {Diaz-Calderon et al., 2000} Diaz-Calderon, A., Paredis, C., and Khosla, P. (2000). Reconfigurable models: A modeling paradigm to support simulation-based design. In Proceedings of SCS 2000 Summer Computer Simulation Conference. The Society for Computer Simulation International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. {Fumarola et al., 2010a} Fumarola, M., Seck, M., and Verbraeck, A. (2010a). A DEVS component library for simulation-based design of automated container terminals. In Proceedings of the 3rd International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques. Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. {Fumarola et al., 2010b} Fumarola, M., Seck, M., and Verbraeck, A. (2010b). Multipleworlds: A formalism for simulation based design. In Proceedings of SCS 2010 Summer Computer Simulation Conference. The Society for Computer Simulation International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. {Hu et al., 2005} Hu, X., Zeigler, B., and Mittal, S. (2005). Variable structure in devs component-based modeling and simulation. Simulation, 81(2):91--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. {Liu et al., 2004} Liu, C.-I., Jula, H., Vukadinovic, K., and Ioannou, P. (2004). Automated guided vehicle system for two container yard layouts. Transportation Research. Part C, Emerging technologies, 12(5):349--368.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. {Medeiros et al., 2000} Medeiros, D., Traband, M., Tribble, A., Lepro, R., Fast, K., and Williams, D. (2000). Simulation based design for a shipyard manufacturing process. In Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, pages 1411--1414. Winter Simulation Conference Board of Directors. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. {Ottjes et al., 2006} Ottjes, J., Veeke, H., Duinkerken, M., Rijsenbrij, J., and Lodewijks, G. (2006). Simulation of a multiterminal system for container handling. OR Spectrum, 28(4):447--468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. {Pielage, 2005} Pielage, B.-J. (2005). Conceptual Design of Automated Freight Transport Systems: Methodology and Practice. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. {Saanen, 2004} Saanen, Y. (2004). An approach for designing robotized marine container terminals. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. {Simon, 1977} Simon, H. (1977). The New Science of Management Decision. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. {Steenken et al., 2004} Steenken, D., Voß, S., and Stahlbock, R. (2004). Container terminal operation and operations research - a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum, 26(1):3--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. {Veenstra et al., 2004} Veenstra, A., Lang, N., and van den Rakt, B. (2004). Economic analysis of a container terminal simulation. International Journal of Logistics, 7(3):263--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. {Vis, 2002} Vis, I. F. A. (2002). Planning and control concepts for material handling systems. PhD thesis, University of Rotterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. {Zeigler and Hammond, 2007} Zeigler, B. P. and Hammond, P. E. (2007). Modeling & Simulation-based Data Engineering: Introducing Pragmatics Into Ontologies For Netcentric Information Exchange. Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. {Zeigler and Praehofer, 2000} Zeigler, B. P. and Praehofer, H. (2000). Theory of Modeling and Simulation. Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader