skip to main content
10.1145/1878537.1878732acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspringsimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Finding synergy in simulation modeling by architects and engineers in conceptual design

Published:11 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The interest in having architects utilize building simulation software to better inform conceptual design decisions has been present in the design industry for more than a decade, yet the adoption of simulation by architects in practice has been slow. Past research into the barriers of adoption has often looked through the lens of particular software, with conclusions aimed at improving the tools' interface and applicability to the architects' process. While software has made great advancement, we hear more often today of the engineer stepping forward to apply simulation to the conceptual design process rather than the architect learning to use simulation. In a survey of ten North American firms, diverse in offering design and/or engineering services, individual practices for incorporating simulation into conceptual design were compared. The more common presence of the engineer in conceptual design modeling promises a new collaborative approach to the sustainable design process, overcoming a significant barrier to the architects own adoption while highlighting a need for greater efficiencies in communication between software and analysis time.

References

  1. California Energy Commission. "Building Design Advisor." Buildings End-Use Energy Efficiency, Public Interest Energy Research Program (PIER), 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarke, J. A. Energy Simulation in Building Design. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann of Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd., 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fortmeyer, Russell. "When Less Powers More." Architectural Record, December 2006: 164--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Grau, Karl, and Kim B. Wittchen. "Building Design System and CAD Integration." IBPSA. Kyoto: IBPSA, 1999. 607--615.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gruman, David L. ASHRAE Green Guide. Atlanta, GA.: American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nall, Daniel H. "Building Energy Simulation and the Architect." Building Simulation 1985. Seattle: International Building Performance Simulation Association, 1985. 45--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Watson, Donald, and Kenneth Labs. Climatic Design: Energy-Efficient Building Principles and Practices. McGraw-Hill Inc., 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader