skip to main content
10.1145/1878803.1878829acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using accessible math textbooks with students who have learning disabilities

Published:25 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Math is a subject that most students in K-12 participate in every school day. This includes students with learning disabilities as they are equally accountable to meeting general math curriculum requirements. Project SMART provided digital versions of math textbooks modified to include MathML for use by eighth grade students with various learning disabilities. A goal of Project SMART was to determine whether these accessible digital textbooks improved student test performance as compared to control groups using the same texts in print format with a traditional oral accommodation. The study also examined the extent to which using accessible math impacted student perceptions about math abilities. Students and most teachers found the accessible digital textbooks preferable to the print versions. This was generally reflected in higher test scores as well as consistently positive responses from qualitative measures obtained from ongoing student and teacher surveys.

References

  1. "Docket Number: 09-97-2145.RES," Office of Civil Rights, Region IX, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Barraza, D. J. Gillan, A. Karshmer, and S. Pazuchanics, "A Cognitive Analysis of Equation Reading Applied to the Development of Assistive Technology for Visually-Impaired Students," presented at Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Center for Applied Special Technology, "NIMAS Technical Specification", 2005, http://nimas.cast.org/about/proposal/spec-v1_1.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Elkind, "Using Computer-Based Readers to Improve Reading Comprehension of Students with Dyslexia," Annals of Dyslexia, vol. 43, pp. 238--59, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Elkind, M. S. Black, and C. Murray, "Computer-based compensation of adult reading disabilities," Annals of Dyslexia, vol. 46, pp. 159--186, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. K. Garnett, "Math Learning Disabilities", 1998, http://www.ldonline.org/article/5896.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. gh, "MathSpeak", 2004-2006, www.gh-mathspeak.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Karshmer and D. Gillan, "How well can we read equations to blind mathematics students: some answers from psychology," Universal Access in HCI - Inclusive Design in the Information Society, vol. 4, pp. 1290--1294, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. I. Karshmer, C. Bledsoe, and P. Stanley, "The Architecture of a Comprehensive Equation Browser for the Print Impaired," presented at Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kurzweil Educational Systems, "Kurzweil 3000 - Solutions for Struggling Readers", http://www.kurzweiledu.com/kurz3000.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Lewis, "Reflections on interviewing children and young people as a method of inquiry in exploring their perspectives on inclusion," Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, vol. 1, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. G. Light and J. C. DeFries, "Comorbidity of Reading and Mathematics Disabilities: Genetic and Environmental Etiologies.," vol. 28, pp. 96--106, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. I. Lundberg, "The computer as a tool for remediation in the special education of reading disabled students: A theory-based approach," Learning Disability Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 89--100, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. M. M. Mazzocco and G. F. Myers, "Complexities in Identifying and Defining Mathematics Learning Disability in the Primary School-Age Years.," vol. 53, pp. 218--53, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Montali and L. Lewandowski, "Bimodal Reading: Benefits of a Talking Computer for Average and Less Skilled Readers.," vol. 29, pp. 271--79, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Nemeth, The Nemeth Braille Code for Mathematics and Science Notation, 1972 Revision ed. Frankfort: American Printing House for the Blind, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. NIMAS Board, "NIMAS Board Voting and Consensus", 2009, http://nimas.cast.org/center/board/voting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. T. V. Raman, Audio System for Technical Readings: Cornell University, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. H. Raskind and E. L. Higgins, "The effects of speech synthesis on proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities," Learning Disabilities Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 141--158, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. N. Soiffer, "MathPlayer V2.1: Web-based Math Accessibility," presented at Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, Phoenix, AZ, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. N. Soiffer and K. Kahl, "Specification for a Digital Talking Book Modular Extension for Mathematics", 2007, www.daisy.org/projects/mathml/mathml-in-daisy-spec.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. D. Stevens, A. D. N. Edwards, and P. A. Harling, "Access to mathematics for visually disabled students through multi-modal interaction," Human-Computer Interaction (Special issue on Multimodal Interfaces), pp. 47--92, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. TextHELP!, "Read&Write Gold", www.texthelp.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. K. Torgesen and T. A. Barker, "Computers as Aids in the Prevention and Remediation of Reading Disabilities.," vol. 18, pp. 76--87, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using accessible math textbooks with students who have learning disabilities

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ASSETS '10: Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
          October 2010
          346 pages
          ISBN:9781605588810
          DOI:10.1145/1878803

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 October 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader