skip to main content
10.1145/1879021.1879027acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Components, platforms and possibilities: towards generic automation for MDA

Published: 24 October 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Model-driven architecture (MDA) is a model-based approach for engineering complex software systems. MDA is particularly attractive for designing embedded systems because models can be easily evolved as hardware and software requirements evolve. However, efforts to apply MDA in industrial settings expose several open problems surrounding tooling: Engineers need automated techniques that are scalable, general, and extensible. In this paper we describe the formula framework as a novel approach towards general automation for MDA. We develop a running example and benchmarks to compare our tools with other state-of-theart approaches.

References

[1]
K. Anastasakis, B. Bordbar, G. Georg, and I. Ray. UML2Alloy: A Challenging Model Transformation. In MoDELS, pages 436--450, 2007.
[2]
D. S. Batory. Feature Models, Grammars, and Propositional Formulas. In SPLC, pages 7--20, 2005.
[3]
A. Benveniste, L. P. Carloni, P. Caspi, and A. L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. Heterogeneous Reactive Systems Modeling and Correct-by-Construction Deployment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT 2003), pages 35--50, 2003.
[4]
B. Best, J. Jurjens, and B. Nuseibeh. Model-Based Security Engineering of Distributed Information Systems Using UMLsec. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2007), pages 581--590, 2007.
[5]
B. Bordbar and K. Anastasakis. MDA and Analysis of Web Applications. In TEAA, pages 44--55, 2005.
[6]
M. Broy. Challenges in automotive software engineering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2006), pages 33--42, 2006.
[7]
R. E. Bryant. Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation. IEEE Trans. Computers, 35(8):677--691, 1986.
[8]
E. Dantsin, T. Eiter, G. Gottlob, and A. Voronkov. Complexity and expressive power of logic programming. ACM Comput. Surv., 33(3):374--425, 2001.
[9]
L. M. de Moura and N. Bjorner. Z3: An Efficient SMT Solver. In Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS'08), pages 337--340, 2008.
[10]
M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming. In ICLP/SLP, pages 1070--1080, 1988.
[11]
M. Gries. Methods for evaluating and covering the design space during early design development. Integration, 38(2):131--183, 2004.
[12]
C. Hammerschmidt. Vector, TTTech win Audi Autosar software contract. EE Times Europe, (222900943), July 2010.
[13]
H. Heinecke, W. Damm, B. Josko, A. Metzner, H. Kopetz, A. L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, and M. D. Natale. Software Components for Reliable Automotive Systems. In DATE 2008, pages 549--554, 2008.
[14]
T. A. Henzinger, B. Horowitz, and C. M. Kirsch. Giotto: a time-triggered language for embedded programming. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(1):84--99, 2003.
[15]
M. Herrmannsdoerfer, S. Benz, and E. Jürgens. COPE - Automating Coupled Evolution of Metamodels and Models. In ECOOP 2009, pages 52--76, 2009.
[16]
D. Jackson. Software Abstractions: Logic, language, and Analysis. MIT Press, 2006.
[17]
E. K. Jackson, D. Seifert, M. Dahlweid, T. Santen, N. Bjorner, and W. Schulte. Specifying and Composing Non-functional Requirements in Model-Based Development. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Composition (SC 2009), pages 72--89, 2009.
[18]
E. K. Jackson and J. Sztipanovits. Towards a formal foundation for domain specific modeling languages. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT 2006), pages 53--62, 2006.
[19]
O. Kindel and M. Friedrich. Software Engineering with AUTOSAR. dpunkt, Heidelberg, 2009.
[20]
P. Manolios, D. Vroon, and G. Subramanian. Automating component-based system assembly. In ISSTA, pages 61--72, 2007.
[21]
E. Neema, J. Sztipanovits, and G. Karsai. Constraint-based design-space exploration and model synthesis. In EMSOFT, pages 290--305, 2003.
[22]
Object Management Group. MDA Guide Version 1.0.1, 2003.
[23]
T. Syrjanen and I. Niemela. The Smodels System. In LPNMR 2001, pages 434--438, 2001.
[24]
A. Tiberghien, P. Merle, and L. Seinturier. Specifying Self-configurable Component-Based Systems with FracToy. In ABZ, pages 91--104, 2010.
[25]
E. Torlak and D. Jackson. Kodkod: A Relational Model Finder. In TACAS, pages 632--647, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Improving Symbolic System-Level Synthesis by Solver Coordination and Domain-Specific HeuristicsElectronics10.3390/electronics1112188811:12(1888)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2022
  • (2019)Automatic Identifying Interaction Components in Collaborative Cyber-Physical Systems2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00035(197-203)Online publication date: Dec-2019
  • (2019)Reasoning about Clinical Guidelines based on Algebraic Data Types and Constraint Logic ProgrammingJournal of Biomedical Informatics10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103134(103134)Online publication date: Mar-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Components, platforms and possibilities: towards generic automation for MDA

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    EMSOFT '10: Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Embedded software
    October 2010
    318 pages
    ISBN:9781605589046
    DOI:10.1145/1879021
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    • CEDA
    • IEEE CAS
    • IEEE CS

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 October 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. formal specification
    2. logic programming
    3. model synthesis
    4. model-driven architecture

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ESWeek '10
    ESWeek '10: Sixth Embedded Systems Week
    October 24 - 29, 2010
    Arizona, Scottsdale, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 60 of 203 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Improving Symbolic System-Level Synthesis by Solver Coordination and Domain-Specific HeuristicsElectronics10.3390/electronics1112188811:12(1888)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2022
    • (2019)Automatic Identifying Interaction Components in Collaborative Cyber-Physical Systems2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00035(197-203)Online publication date: Dec-2019
    • (2019)Reasoning about Clinical Guidelines based on Algebraic Data Types and Constraint Logic ProgrammingJournal of Biomedical Informatics10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103134(103134)Online publication date: Mar-2019
    • (2019)Example-driven modelingSoftware and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)10.1007/s10270-017-0652-318:3(2213-2239)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019
    • (2019)An Integrated Framework to Develop Domain-Specific Languages: Extended Case StudyModel-Driven Engineering and Software Development10.1007/978-3-030-11030-7_8(159-184)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2019
    • (2018)Enabling design-space exploration for domain-specific modellingProceedings of the Model-driven Approaches for Simulation Engineering Symposium10.5555/3213214.3213219(1-13)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2018
    • (2017)Automated Synthesis and Dynamic Analysis of Tradeoff Spaces for Object-Relational MappingIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2016.258764643:2(145-163)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
    • (2017)Network-Wide Configuration SynthesisComputer Aided Verification10.1007/978-3-319-63390-9_14(261-281)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2017
    • (2017)CSL4PSystems Engineering10.1002/sys.2138620:3(220-234)Online publication date: 1-May-2017
    • (2015)A symbolic system synthesis approach for hard real-time systems based on coordinated SMT-solvingProceedings of the 2015 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition10.5555/2755753.2755834(357-362)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2015
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media