skip to main content
10.1145/1899475.1899500acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dynamic versus static peephole navigation of VR panoramas on handheld devices

Published:01 December 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtual reality panoramic images are becoming increasingly popular on handheld devices, but navigating them remains a challenge due to small screen sizes. In this paper, we present a formal evaluation and usability studies comparing two interaction concepts. In the first one, the device is seen as a static peephole and the data is moved behind it via touch screen-based scrolling. In the second one, a mobile phone's sensors are used to create a dynamic peephole that can be moved over static content. In the results of our formal analysis sensor-based dynamic peephole navigation performed twice as good in an orientation task, 75% better in an object size discrimination task, and was preferred by 80% of the users. Despite these advantages, additional usability studies indicate that if they are sitting, a majority of users resort to touch screen-based static peephole navigation when interacting. Our results therefore demonstrate benefits of dynamic peephole navigation for virtual reality panoramas but also illustrate its limitations depending on the current context of the user.

References

  1. Cho, S., Choi, C., Sung, Y., Lee, K., Kim, Y., and Murray-Smith, R. 2007. Dynamics of tilt-based browsing on mobile devices. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, CA, USA, April 28 -- May 03, 2007). CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 1947--1952. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dersch, H., 2007, PTViewerME -- HowTo. (conference slides), PanoTools Meeting, Luzern 2007, see http://webuser.fh-furtwangen.de/~dersch/PTViewerME/Luzern.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fitchett, S. and Cockburn, A. 2009. Evaluating reading and analysis tasks on mobile devices: a case study of tilt and flick scrolling. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human interaction Special interest Group: Design: Open 24/7 (Melbourne, Australia, November 23--27, 2009). OZCHI '09, vol. 411. ACM, New York, NY, 225--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fitzmaurice, G. W. 1993. Situated information spaces and spatially aware palmtop computers. Commun. ACM 36, 7 (Jul. 1993), 39--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gilbertson, P., Coulton, P., Chehimi, F., and Vajk, T. 2008. Using "tilt" as an interface to control "no-button" 3-D mobile games. Comput. Entertain. 6, 3 (Oct. 2008), 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Harrison, B. L., Fishkin, K. P., Gujar, A., Mochon, C., and Want, R. 1998. Squeeze me, hold me, tilt me! An exploration of manipulative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Los Angeles, California, United States, April 18--23, 1998). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hürst, W. and Wittmer, S. 2009. Navigating VR Panoramas on Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 2009 13th international Conference information Visualisation (July 15--17, 2009). IV. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 203--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mehra, S., Werkhoven, P., and Worring, M. 2006. Navigating on handheld displays: Dynamic versus static peephole navigation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 13, 4 (Dec. 2006), 448--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Rekimoto, J. 1996. Tilting operations for small screen interfaces. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology (Seattle, Washington, United States, November 06--08, 1996). UIST '96. ACM, New York, NY, 167--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rohs, M. and Essl, G. 2007. Sensing-based interaction for information navigation on handheld displays. In Proceedings of the 9th international Conference on Human Computer interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Singapore, September 09--12, 2007). MobileHCI '07, vol. 309. ACM, New York, NY, 387--394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rohs, M., Schöning, J., Raubal, M., Essl, G., and Krüger, A. 2007. Map navigation with mobile devices: virtual versus physical movement with and without visual context. In Proceedings of the 9th international Conference on Multimodal interfaces (Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, November 12--15, 2007). ICMI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 146--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yee, K. 2003. Peephole displays: pen interaction on spatially aware handheld computers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, April 05--10, 2003). CHI '03. ACM, New York, NY, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic versus static peephole navigation of VR panoramas on handheld devices

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MUM '10: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
        December 2010
        239 pages
        ISBN:9781450304245
        DOI:10.1145/1899475

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 December 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader