skip to main content
10.1145/1900008.1900096acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Shot boundary detection and key frame extraction using salient region detection and structural similarity

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a novel algorithm for shot boundary detection and key frame extraction from video sequences. Saliency maps representing the attended regions are produced from the color and luminance features of the video frames. Introducing a novel signal fidelity measurement -saliency based structural similarity index- the similarity of the maps is measured. Based on the similarities, shot boundaries and key frames are determined. Proposed algorithm is tested on neurosurgical videos and precision and recall performances are measured. Experimental results validate effectiveness of the proposed shot boundary detection and key frame extraction algorithm. Moreover, the algorithm is robust to dissolving digital video effects used in shot transition.

References

  1. Mendi, E., Bayrak, B. and Yasargil G., "Shot Boundary Detection and Key Frame Extraction from Neurosurgical Video Sequences based on Color Information", The Seventh Annual Conference of the MidSouth Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Society (MCBIOS), Jonesboro, Arkansas, February 19--20, 2010. (submitted).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Porter, S., "Video Segmentation and Indexing using Motion Estimation". PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yeo, B. and Liu, B., "Rapid Scene Analysis on Compressed Video". IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol: 5, No: 6, pp: 533--544, December 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Huan, Z., Xiuhuan, L. and Lilei, Y., "Shot Boundary Detection Based on Mutual Information and Canny Edge Detector", Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering - Volume 02. pp: 1124--1128, July 2008, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Miene, A., Hermes, T., Ioannidis, G., Fathi, R. and Herzog, O., "Automatic shot boundary detection and classification of indoor and outdoor scenes". TREC 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mas, J. and Fernandez, G., "Video Shot Boundary Detection Based on Color Histogram", TRECVID Workshop 2003, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, M., Foote, J., Adcock, J. and Casi, S., "Shot boundary detection via similarity analysis". In Proceedings of the TRECVID Workshop. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lowe, D. G., "Three-dimensional object recognition from single two dimensional images". Artificial Intelligence, 31:355--395, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gong, Y. and Liu, L., "Video summarization using singular value decomposition," IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yueting, Z., Yong, R., Huang, T. S. and Mehrotra, S., "Adaptive key frame extraction using supervised clustering," IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Achanta, R., Hemami, S., Estrada, F. and Süsstrunk, S., "Frequency-tuned Salient Region Detection", IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sheikh, H. R., Sabir, M. and Bovik, A. C., "A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms," IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 3440--3451, Nov. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mendi, E., Milanova, M., Zhou, Y. and Talburt, J., "Image Quality Assessment based on Salient Region Detection", EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Special Issue on Advanced Image Processing for Defense and Security Applications, 2010. (to appear)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, Q. and Wang, Z., "Video quality assessment by incorporating a motion perception model," in Image Processing, 2007. ICIP 2007. IEEE International Conference on, 2007, vol. 2, pp. 173--176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. ORLive, Inc.: Online Surgical and Healthcare Video and Webcasts, http://www.orlive.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. NIST, Shot Boundary Evaluation Guide, http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/t2002v/sbmeasures.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Shot boundary detection and key frame extraction using salient region detection and structural similarity

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ACM SE '10: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Southeast Regional Conference
        April 2010
        488 pages
        ISBN:9781450300643
        DOI:10.1145/1900008

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ACM SE '10 Paper Acceptance Rate48of94submissions,51%Overall Acceptance Rate178of377submissions,47%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader