skip to main content
10.1145/1900441.1900475acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Five enunciations of empowerment in participatory design

Published:29 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Participatory design has been defined as having 'user's democratic participation and empowerment at its core' (Correia and Yusop, 2008). The PD discourse has a strong moral and rhetorical claim by its emphasis on users' empowerment. This paper is a result of a student project, guided by a curiosity about how empowerment is enunciated in the PD field today. In a literature-review of academic papers from the proceedings of PDC 2008 we found that empowerment is enunciated in five different ways which can be translated into 5 categories: 1) Specific user groups 2) Direct democracy 3) The users' position 4) Researchers' practice 5) Reflexive practice. These categories exist conjointly in the literature and suggest that empowerment is not just a moral and politically correct design goal, but a challenged and complex activity.

References

  1. Clark, B. Resources for Action in the Negotiation of Participatory Design Projects. Proc. PDC 2008, 206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Correia, A. and Yusop, F. D. "I Don't want to be Empowered": The Challenge of Involving Real-world Clients in Instructional Design Experiences. Proc. PDC 2008, 214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Finken, S. Discursive conditions of knowledge production within cooperative design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2003, 15: 57--72 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mörtberg, C., Stuedahl D. Silence' as an analytical category for PD. Proc. PDC 2008, 170--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hess, J. et al. Community Driven Development as participation? -- Involving User Communities in a Software Design Process. Proc. PDC 2008, 33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. MacDonald, S. Clement A. Participatory Tensions in Developing a Community Learning Network. Proc. PDC 2008, 234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Schuler D. Towards Liberating Voices 2.0 Proc. PDC 2008, 198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PDC '10: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference
    November 2010
    314 pages
    ISBN:9781450301312
    DOI:10.1145/1900441

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 November 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader