skip to main content
10.1145/1924559.1924585acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvgipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

3D visualization of cardiac tagged magnetic resonance image data using Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS)

Published:12 December 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper demonstrates accurate, anatomically correct 3D visualization of left and right ventricles of the human heart from tagged magnetic resonance imaging data. Tagged MRI reveals 3D structural and motion information that is incorporated into the visualized models. We use Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS) for our purpose, that allow non-uniform knot specification and weight specification of control points, an advantage over traditional uniform B-Splines. NURBS algorithms are numerically stable and fast. The myocardial models serve the purpose of (i) accurate visualization of tag planes and myocardial walls, (ii)checking tag tracking accuracy and registration errors, (iii)providing framework for 4D visualization and motion analysis, and (iv)obtaining accurate, memory efficient and compactly supported models of the heart in anatomical dimensions. We obtain excellent results on normal as well as pathological patient datasets.

References

  1. L. Axel and L. Dougherty. MR imaging of motion with spatial modulation of magnetization. Radiology, 171(3):841--45, August 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. Cauvin, J. Boire, M. Zanca, J. Bonny, J. Maublant, and A. Veyre. 3D modeling in myocardial 201tl SPECT. Comput. Med. Imag. Graph., 17(4--5):345--350, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. deBoor. A Practical Guide to Splines. Springer-Verlag, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. Denney. Estimation and detection of myocardial tags in MR image without user-defined myocardial contours. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 18(4):330--334, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Duncan, P. Shi, T. Constable, and A. Sinusas. Physical and geometrical modeling for image-based recovery of left ventricular deformation. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 69(2--3):333--351, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Haber, D. Metaxas, and L. Axel. Three-dimensional geometric modeling of cardiac right and left ventricles. In The Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Meeting, San Diego.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Kuwahara and S. Eiho. 3-D heart image reconstruction from MRI data. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 15(4):241--246, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Maehle, K. Bjoernstad, S. Aakhus, H. Torp, and B. Angelsen. Three-dimensional echocardiography for quantitative left ventricular wall motion analysis: A method for reconstruction of endocardial surface and evaluation of regional dysfunction. Echocardiography, 11(4):397--408, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Metaxas and D. Terzopoulos. Shape and nonrigid motion estimation through physiscs-based synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(6):580, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Piegl and W. Tiller. The NURBS Book. Springer-Verlag, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Radeva, A. Amini, and J. Huang. Deformable b-solids and implicit snakes for 3-D localization and tracking of SPAMM-MRI data. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 66(2):163--178, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Shi, A. Sinusas, R. Constable, E. Ritman, and J. Duncan. Point-tracked quantitative analysis of left ventricle surface from 3d image sequences: Algorithms and validation. IEEE Transactions of Medical Imaging, 19(1):36--50, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. N. Tustison and A. Amini. Biventricular myocardial strains via nonrigid registration of anatomical models. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 25(1):94--112, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. Veress, W. Segars, B. Tsui, J. Weiss, and G. Gullberg. Normal and pathological NCAT image and phantom data based on physiologically realistic left ventricle finite element models. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 25(12):1604--16, December 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. E. Zerhouni, D. Parish, W. Rogers, A. Yang, and E. Shapiro. Human heart: Tagging with MR imaging - a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion. Radiology, 169(1):59--63, October 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. 3D visualization of cardiac tagged magnetic resonance image data using Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS)

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICVGIP '10: Proceedings of the Seventh Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
            December 2010
            533 pages
            ISBN:9781450300605
            DOI:10.1145/1924559

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 12 December 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate95of286submissions,33%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader