skip to main content
10.1145/1931344.1931378acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Field measurement protocol for team communication: a study of medical rehabilitation team interaction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper is introducing an online communication behavior measurement protocol, developed for medical team work, especially for studying the medical rehabilitation teams on interdisciplinary meetings. The purpose of the research is to analyze the development and usage of shared mental models (SMM) through the communication in medical practice of interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams in order to identify the factors determining the patient safety, and the effectiveness of rehabilitation. The online quantitative rating method uses two parallel raters to count and record the communication utterances of each participant directed to another. The quantitative and interactional data is analyzed, and visualized by AGNA network analysis software. Based on the results (network indices, and communication network diagram) the strong and weak points of communication can be recognized, as the important areas of SMM development. This can be a basis of a development process to enhance team effectiveness, and patient safety.

References

  1. AGNA Social Network Analysis Software, developed by Benta, I. M. (2003). Free to download, at http://www.tucows.com/preview/295919Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bokhour, B. G. Communication in interdisciplinary team meetings: What are we talking about? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 20, 4, (2006), 349--363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cooke, N. J. Salas, E., Cannon-Bovers, J. A., Stout, R. Measuring Team Knowledge. Human Factors, 42(2000), 151--173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Devenport, T. H., Glaser, J. Just-in Time Delivery comes to Knowledge Management. Harvard Business Review, (2002), 5--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eigisti, I.-M., Bennetto, L., Dadlani, M. Beyond pragmatics: Morphosyntactic Development in Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(2007), 1007--1023.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Eldar, R., Marincek, C., Kullmann L. Need for Rehabilitation Teamwork Training in Europe. Croatian Medical Journal, 49 (2008), 352--357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Eppich, W. J., Brannen, M., Hunt, E. A. Team training: implications for emergency and critical care pediatrics. Current Options in Pediatrics, 20 (2008), 255--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hámornik, B. P., Juhász, M., Soós J. Azorvosi team tudás, interakció, éskommunikációvizsgálata a rehabilitációterületén. {The analysis of medical team knowledge, interaction, and communication in rehabilitation}In 10th RODOSZ Conference Issue, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, (2009), 136--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hámornik, B. P., Juhász M. A team-munkaszerepe a rehabilitációorvosimunkában {The role of teamwork in medical practice} In Juhász, M. (ed.) A foglalkozásirehabilitációtámogatásapszichológiaieszközökkel {The Support of Vocational Rehabilitation by Psychological Tools} Typotex, Budapest, (2010). 61--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nemeth, C. P., Kowalsy, J., Brandwijk, M., Kahana, M., Klock, P. A., Cook, R. I. Between shifts: Heathcare communication is PICU. In Nemeth, C. P. (ed.) Improving healthcare team communication, University of Chicago(2008), 135--153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Field measurement protocol for team communication: a study of medical rehabilitation team interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MB '10: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research
      August 2010
      183 pages
      ISBN:9781605589268
      DOI:10.1145/1931344
      • Editors:
      • Emilia Barakova,
      • Boris de Ruyter,
      • Andrew Spink

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 August 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader