skip to main content
10.1145/1940761.1940803acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

'The internet is here': emergent coordination and innovation of protest forms in digital culture

Published: 08 February 2011 Publication History

Abstract

The series of protests against the Church of Scientology known as "Project Chanology" marks the emergence of an important form of contemporary protest movement defined by networked internal structures and pervasive memetic culture. Such a protest movement is highly dynamic- rapidly adapting to changing challenges and contextual settings. This cultural innovation is made possible by the increasing digital mediation of social life. In the following analysis, we trace the unique structural contours of Chanology, investigate how participants leveraged a unique internal structure and the memetic environment of the internet to grow, and conclude with an explanation of why the novel modes of protest used in Chanology contributed to its success and why these forms of protest are likely to proliferate in an increasingly digitally mediated environment. From a theoretical standpoint, Project Chanology both affirms and challenges conventional conceptions of social movements. The utility of Chwe's network analytical approach to the problems of coordination in social movements is also demonstrated.

References

[1]
Anderson, C. (2008). The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. New York: Hyperion.
[2]
Antaki, C., Ardèvol, E., Nùñez, F., & Vayreda, A. (2006). 'For she who knows who she is:' Managing accountability in online forum messages. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 114--132.
[3]
Atack, J. (1990). A Piece of Blue Sky: Scientology, Dianetics, and L. Ron Hubbard Exposed. New York: Lyle Stuart.
[4]
Baram, M. (2008). Scientology's anonymous critics: Who are they? Retrieved June 12, 2008, from ABC News Online: http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=4513883&page=1.
[5]
Barkham, P. (2008). Hackers declare war on Scientologists amid claims of heavy-handed Cruise control: Actor's video clip forced off YouTube, say activists: Church hit by sabotage of website and day of protest. The Guardian (London), p. 3.
[6]
Baym, N. (2010). Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Boston, MA: Polity.
[7]
Bellini, C. G., & Vargas, L. M. (2003). Rationale for internet-mediated communities. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(1), 3--14.
[8]
Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[9]
Burke, P. and J. Reitzes. (1991). "An Identity Theory Approach to Commitment." Social Science Quarterly 54 (3): 239--251.
[10]
Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 6), 1287--1335.
[11]
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural Holes and Good Ideas. Am. J. Sociology 110, 349
[12]
Chwe, M. S.-Y. (2000). Communication and coordination in social networks. Review of Economic Studies, 67, 1--16.
[13]
Clarkson, B. (2008). 200 cruise by Scientology HQ; Younge St. demonstration part of global protest. The Toronto Sun, p. 6.
[14]
Constant, Sproull, Keisler. (1996). "The Kindness of Strangers: Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice." Organization Science 7(2): 199--135.
[15]
Dawes, Robyn M., et al. (1986). "Organizing Groups for Collective Action." The American Political Science Review 80 (4):1171--1185.
[16]
Dawkins, R. (1990). The Selfish Gene, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press
[17]
Diani, M. (2000). "Social Movement Networks Virtual and Real." Information, Communication & Society 3 (3):386.
[18]
DiMaggio, P., E. Hargittai, W. R. Neuman, and J. P. Robinson. (2001). "Social Implication of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 307--36.
[19]
Gleave, E., H. T. Welser, T. M. Lento, and M. A. Smith. (2009). "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of 'Social Role' in Online Community." Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: 1--11.
[20]
Irriberri, A., & Leroy, G. (2009). A life cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Computer Surveys, 41(2), 1--29.
[21]
Lasar, D., A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A. Barabási, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Gutmann, T. Jebara, G. King, M. Macy, D. Roy, M. Van Alstyne. 2009. "Computational Social Science." Science Magazine 323 (5915) 721--723.
[22]
Lento, T., H. T. Welser, L. Gu, and M. Smith. 2006. "The Ties that Blog: Examining the Relationship between Social Ties and Continued Participation in the Wallop Weblogging System" WWW Third Annual Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem, Edinburgh, Ireland.
[23]
McAdam, D. and R. Paulsen. (1993). Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Activism. American Journal of Sociology 99(3): 640--667.
[24]
Papacharissi, Z. (2009). "The Virtual Geographies of Social Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld." New Media & Society 11 (1--2):199--220.
[25]
Perrotta, C. (2006). Learning to be a psychologist: the construction of identity in an online forum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 456--466.
[26]
Pichardo, Nelson A. (1997). "New Social Movements: A Critical Review." Annual Review of Sociology 23: 411--30.
[27]
Pickerill, J. (2001). Environmental internet activism in Britain. Peace Review, 13(3), 365--370.
[28]
Polletta, Francesca and James Jasper. (2001). "Collective Identity in Social Movements." Annual Review of Sociology. 27: 283--305.
[29]
Purcell, K. (2010, March 23). Teens and the internet: The future of digital diversity. Pew internet & American Life Project.
[30]
Resnik, P., R. Zeckhauser, E. Friedman, and K. Kuwabara. (2000). "Reputation Systems." Communication of the ACM. 43(12).
[31]
Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. New York: Basic Books.
[32]
Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York, NY: Free Press.
[33]
Rolfe, B. (2005). Building an electronic repertoire of contention. Social Movement Studies, 4(1), 65--74.
[34]
Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: The Penguin Press.
[35]
Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. New York: The Penguin Press.
[36]
Simmel, G. (1971). "The Metropolis and Mental Life". Pp. 43--69 in On Individuality and Social Forms printed in the United States: University of Chicago Press.
[37]
Simon B, Stürmer S, Loewy M, et al. (1988). "Collective Identification and Social Movement Participation." Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 74(3):646--658.
[38]
Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265--290.
[39]
Taylor, V. and N. Van Dyke. (2004). "'Get up, Stand up': Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements" in The Blackwell Companion of Social Movements. Edited by David Snow, Anne Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi. Wiley Blackwell.
[40]
Tilly, C. (2004). Social Movements: 1768--2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, LLC.
[41]
Williamson, O. E. 1981. "The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach." The American Journal of Sociology 87(3): 548--557.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. 'The internet is here': emergent coordination and innovation of protest forms in digital culture

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    iConference '11: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference
    February 2011
    858 pages
    ISBN:9781450301213
    DOI:10.1145/1940761
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 February 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. chanology
    2. culture
    3. memes
    4. networked activism
    5. protest
    6. social movements

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    iConference '11
    iConference '11: iConference 2011
    February 8 - 11, 2011
    Washington, Seattle, USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media