skip to main content
10.1145/1940761.1940863acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling diverse standpoints in text classification: learning to be human by modeling human values

Published:08 February 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

An annotator's classification of a text not only tells us something about the intent of the text's author, it also tells us something about the annotator's standpoint. To understand authorial intent, we can consider all of these diverse standpoints, as well as the extent to which the annotators' standpoints affect their perceptions of authorial intent. To model human behavior, it is important to model humans' unique standpoints. Human values play an especially important role in determining human behavior and how people perceive the world around them, so any effort to model human behavior and perception can benefit from an effort to understand and model human values. Instead of training humans to obscure their standpoints and act like computers, we should teach computers to have standpoints of their own.

References

  1. Chong, D. and Druckman, J. N. 2007. Framing theory. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 10, 1 (Jun. 2007), 103--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Wiegand, W. A. 2003. To reposition a research agenda: What American studies can teach the LIS community about the library in the life of the user. Libr. Quart. 73, 4 (Oct. 2003), 369--382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Kaestle, C. F. 1991. The history of readers. In Literacy in the United States: Readers and Reading Since 1880, C. F. Kaestle, H. Damon-Moore, L. C. Stedman, K. Tinsley, and W. V. Trollinger, Jr., Eds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 33--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Pawley, C. 2002. Seeking 'significance': Actual readers, specific reading communities. Book Hist. 5 (2002), 143--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Haraway, D. 2003. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In The Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives, C. R. McCann and S.-K. Kim, Eds. Routledge, New York, NY, 391--403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Harding, S. 1991. Is Science Multicultural: Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., and Borning, A. 2006. Value sensitive design and information systems. In Human-Computer Interaction and Information Systems, P. Zhang and D. Galletta, Eds. M. E. Sharp, Armonk, NY, 348--372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. Free Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng, A.-S., Fleischmann, K. R., Wang, P., Ishita, E., and Oard, D. W. 2010. Values of stakeholders in the Net neutrality debate: Applying content analysis to telecommunications policy. In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawai'i International Conference on Systems Sciences (Koloa, HI, Jan. 5--8, 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ishita, E., Oard, D. W., Fleischmann, K. R., Cheng, A.-S., and Templeton, T. C. 2010. Investigating multi-label classification for human values. In Proceedings of the 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Pittsburgh, PA, Oct. 22--27, 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Templeton, T. C., Fleischmann, K. R., and Boyd-Graber, J. 2011. Comparing values and sentiment using Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the 6th iConference (Seattle, WA, Feb. 8--11, 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fleischmann, K. R., Oard, D. W., Cheng, A.-S., Wang, P., and Ishita, E. 2009. Automatic classification of human values: Applying computational thinking to information ethics. In Proceedings of the 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Vancouver, BC, Canada, Nov. 6--11, 2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Modeling diverse standpoints in text classification: learning to be human by modeling human values

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        iConference '11: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference
        February 2011
        858 pages
        ISBN:9781450301213
        DOI:10.1145/1940761

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 February 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader