skip to main content
10.1145/1940941.1940950acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesinfoseccdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Risk assessment of voting systems for teaching the art of information security

Published:01 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes case study assignment in risk assessment for a course in information security management. The instructor's approach in the course was to integrate various readings through discussion and assignments. The assignment described in this paper was based on an actual project and used in an information security management course taught in Summer 2010. Readers will benefit from the instructor's description of this assignment, which teaches the art of information security management by creating a hybrid risk assessment process that provides a practical, reusable, scholarly, and realistic exercise. The assignment proved to be a useful, hands-on practice that students were able to satisfactorily complete.

References

  1. Chen, L., Longstaff, T. A., and Carley, K. M. 2006. The provision of defenses against internet-based attacks. In Whitman and Mattord, Readings and Cases in the Management of Information Security, Thomson Course Technology, Boston, MA, 105--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dark, M. A. 2006. Security education, training and awareness from a human performance technology point of view. In Whitman and Mattord, Readings and Cases in the Management of Information Security, Thomson Course Technology, Boston, MA, 86--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Halpert, B. J. 2006. Mobile device security management. In Whitman and Mattord, Readings and Cases in the Management of Information Security, Thomson Course Technology, Boston, MA, 2--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. HAVA. 2002. Help America Vote Act of 2002. Public Law 107--252, 107th Congress, USA. DOI= http://www.fec.gov/hava/hava.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jefferson, D., Rubin, A. D., Simons, B., and Wagner, D. 2004. A security analysis of the secure, electronic registration and voting experiment (SERVE). U.S. Department of Defense: Federal Voting Assistance Program.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jones, Doug W. 2005. Threats to voting systems. NIST Workshop on Threats to Voting Systems (Gaithersburg, MD, October 7, 2005). DOI=http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/voting/nist2005.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lunt, B. M., et al. 2008. Information Technology 2008 Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Technology. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), IEEE Computer Society (November 2008). DOI=http://www.acm.org/education/curricula/IT2008%20Curriculum.pdf/view.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pipkin, D. L. 2006. Linking business objectives and security directives. In Whitman and Mattord, Readings and Cases in the Management of Information Security, Thomson Course Technology, Boston, MA, 8--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Stoneburner, G., Goguen, A. and Feringa, A. 2002. Risk management guide for information technology systems: Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gaithersburg, Md: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. DOI=http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-30/sp800-30.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Whitman, M. 2003. Enemy at the gates: threats to information security," Communications of the ACM. 46, 8, (August 2003), 91--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Whitman, M. E. and Mattord, H. J. 2006a. Readings and Cases in the Management of Information Security, Thomson Course Technology, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Whitman, M. E. and Mattord, H. J. 2006b. Zen and the art of information systems security---a philosophical, spiritual, and mystical approach to protecting information. In Whitman and Mattord, Readings and Cases in the Management of Information Security, Thomson Course Technology, Boston, MA, 33--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Risk assessment of voting systems for teaching the art of information security

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      InfoSecCD '10: 2010 Information Security Curriculum Development Conference
      October 2010
      187 pages
      ISBN:9781450302029
      DOI:10.1145/1940941

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate18of23submissions,78%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader