skip to main content
10.1145/1943403.1943431acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Inferring word relevance from eye-movements of readers

Published: 13 February 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Reading is one of the most important skills in today's society. The ubiquity of this activity has naturally affected many information systems; the only goal of some is the presentation of textual information. One concrete task often performed on a computer and involving reading is finding relevant parts of text. In the current study, we investigated if word-level relevance, defined as a binary measure of an individual word being congruent with the reader's current informational needs, could be inferred given only the text and eye movements of readers. We found that the number of fixations, first-pass fixations, and the total viewing time can be used to predict the relevance of sentence-terminal words. In light of what is known about eye movements of readers, knowing which sentence-terminal words are relevant can help in an unobtrusive identification of relevant sentences.

References

[1]
Ajanki, A., Hardoon, D., Kaski, S., Puolamaki, K., & Taylor, J. (2009) Can eyes reveal interest? Implicit queries from gaze patterns. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(4), 307--339.
[2]
Babaian, T., Grosz, B., & Shieber, S. (2002) A writer's collaborative assistant. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 7--14.
[3]
Billsus, D. & Pazzani, M.J. (2000) A learning agent for wireless news access. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 94--97.
[4]
Buscher, G., Dengel, A., & van Elst, L. (2008) Query expansion using gaze-based feedback on the subdocument level. Proceedings of the 31st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 387--394.
[5]
Claypool, M., Le, P., Wased, M., & Brown, D. (2002) Implicit interest indicators. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 33--40.
[6]
Clifton, C., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007) Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 341--371). New York: Elsevier.
[7]
Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S., & White, T. (2005) Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 23(2), 147--168.
[8]
Fu, X., Budzik, J., & Hammond, K. J. (2000) Mining navigation history for recommendation. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 106--112.
[9]
Goecks, J. & Shavlik, J. (2000) Learning user's interests by unobtrusively observing their normal behavior. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 129--132.
[10]
Harris C.M., Hainline L., Abramov I., Lemerise E., & Camenzuli C. (1988) The distribution of fixation durations in infants and naive adults. Vision Research, 28, 419--32.
[11]
Hijikata, Y. (2004) Implicit user profiling for on demand relevance feedback. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 198--205.
[12]
Hyöna, J. & Olson, R.K. (1995) Eye movement patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: Effects of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1430--1340.
[13]
Joachims, T., Granka, L., Bing Pan, Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2005) Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. Proceedings of Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, 154--161.
[14]
Juhasz, B.J. & Rayner, K. (2003) Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1312--1318.
[15]
Juhasz, B.J. & Rayner, K. (2006) The role of age-of-acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 13 (7 & 8), 846--863.
[16]
Just, M.A. & Carpenter, P.A. (1980) A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329--354.
[17]
Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A., & Woolley J.D. (1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3(2), 228--238.
[18]
Kaakinen, J.K. & Hyona, J. (2005) Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking, and recall. Discourse Processes, 40(3), 239--257.
[19]
Kim, J., Oard, D., & Romanik, K. (2000) Using implicit feedback for user modeling in internet and intranet searching, Technical Report, College of Library and Information Services, University of Maryland at College Park.
[20]
Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., Wolfinger, R.D., & Schabenberger, O. (2006) SAS for Mixed Models. 2nd Edition. SAS Publishing, Cary.
[21]
Loboda, T.D. (2009) Pegasus {computer software}. Pittsburgh, PA.
[22]
Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., & Davis, M. (2006) HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. Proceedings of Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, 31--40.
[23]
McConkie, G.W. & Rayner, K. (1976) Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 365--368.
[24]
O'Regan, J.K. (1979) Eye guidance in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 501--509.
[25]
O'Regan, J.K. (1980) The control of saccade size fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 112--117.
[26]
Puolamaki, K., Ajanki, A., & Kaski, S. (2008) Learning to learn implicit queries from gaze patterns. Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, 760--767.
[27]
Rayner, K. & Raney, G.E. (1996) Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(2), 245--248.
[28]
Rayner, K. (1998) Eye Movement in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372--422.
[29]
Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S.A. (2000). The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A(4), 1061--1080.
[30]
Reichle, E.D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D.L., & Rayner, K. (1998) Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125--157.
[31]
Reichle, E.D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003) The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445--476.
[32]
Salojarvi, J., Kojo, I., Simola, J., & Kaski, S. (2003) Can relevance be inferred from eye movements in information retrieval? Proceedings of Workshop on Self-organizing Maps.
[33]
Salojarvi, J., Puolamaki, K., and Kaski, S. (2005) Implicit relevance feedback from eye movements. Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN), 513--518.
[34]
SAS Institute Inc. (2008) SAS 9.2 help and documentation.
[35]
Seo, Y.-W. & Zhang, B.-T. (2000) A reinforcement learning agent for personalized information filtering. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 248--251.
[36]
Sugiyama, K., Hatano, K., & Yoshikawa, M. (2004) Adaptive Web search based on user profile constructed without any effort from users. Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 675--684.
[37]
Swidale, M., Gruzd, A., & Nichols, D. (2008) Writing in the library: Exploring tighter integration of digital library use with the writing process. Information Processing and Management, 44(2), 558--580.
[38]
Underwood, G. (2005) Cognitive Processess in Eye Guidance. Oxford University Press.
[39]
Williams, R.S. & Morris, R.K. (2004) Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 312--339.
[40]
Warren, T., White, S.J., & Reichle, E.D. (2009) Investigating the causes of wrap-up effects: Evidence from eye movements and E-Z Reader. Cognition, 111, 132--137.
[41]
Zhao, S., Du, N., Nauerz, A., Zhang, X., Yuan, Q., & Fu, R. (2008) Improved recommendation based on collaborative tagging behaviors. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 413--416.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Evaluating the Feasibility of Predicting Information Relevance During Sensemaking with Eye Gaze Data2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00086(713-722)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Mining Eye-Tracking Data for Text SummarizationInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.222782740:17(4887-4905)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Gaze-based predictive models of deep reading comprehensionUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-022-09346-733:3(687-725)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IUI '11: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
February 2011
504 pages
ISBN:9781450304191
DOI:10.1145/1943403
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 February 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. eye movements
  2. eye tracking
  3. implicit indicator
  4. information seeking
  5. reading
  6. text relevance
  7. user study
  8. word-level relevance

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

IUI '11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Evaluating the Feasibility of Predicting Information Relevance During Sensemaking with Eye Gaze Data2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00086(713-722)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Mining Eye-Tracking Data for Text SummarizationInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.222782740:17(4887-4905)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Gaze-based predictive models of deep reading comprehensionUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-022-09346-733:3(687-725)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
  • (2020)Towards Real-time Webpage Relevance Prediction UsingConvex Hull Based Eye-tracking FeaturesACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3379157.3391302(1-10)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2020
  • (2020)Relevance Prediction from Eye-movements Using Semi-interpretable Convolutional Neural NetworksProceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3343413.3377960(223-233)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2020
  • (2019)Impact of English Reading Comprehension Abilities on Processing Magazine Style Narrative Visualizations and Implications for PersonalizationProceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3320435.3320447(309-317)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2019
  • (2019)Gaze analysis of user characteristics in magazine style narrative visualizationsUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-019-09244-529:5(977-1011)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2019
  • (2018)Understanding Reading Attention Distribution during Relevance JudgementProceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3269206.3271764(733-742)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2018
  • (2018)Evaluating Saccade-Bounded Eye Movement Features for the User ModelingProceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries10.1145/3197026.3197072(21-24)Online publication date: 23-May-2018
  • (2018)User-adaptive Support for Processing Magazine Style Narrative Visualizations23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3172944.3173009(199-204)Online publication date: 5-Mar-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media