ABSTRACT
Automotive development has been dominated by the constraints of driving. However, natural relations to the more general area of Intelligent User Interfaces exist. Previous research in related fields therefore should be adopted and included. The aim of the 2011 MIAA workshop is to foster discussion between experts in otherwise unrelated fields of research. For example, public interfaces use crossmodal referencing in order to circumvent restrictions by the users current focus on a limited communication channel. Our aim is to raise awareness for this approach, concluding that crossmodal references in the car are helpful to bridge the gap between information inside the car and the environment. Another focus topic of the workshop is eco-friendly driving. Although universally regarded as a necessity, it remains an open question how to encourage drivers to drive ecologically. We discuss for example awards for eco-friendly driving by making it competitive and game-like.
- C. Endres, A. Butz, and A. MacWilliams. A Survey of Software Infrastructures and Frameworks for Ubiquitous Computing. Mobile Information Systems Journal, 1(1):41--80, January-March 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. E. Foster. CoMiC Deliverable 6.1 State of the art review: Multimodal fission, 2002.Google Scholar
- A. Meschtscherjakov, D. Wilfinger, T. Scherndl, and M. Tscheligi. Acceptance of future persuasive in-car interfaces towards a more economic driving behaviour. In AutomotiveUI '09: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 81--88, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Müller and G. Weinberg. Multimodal input in the car, today and tomorrow. IEEE Multimedia, 18(1), 2011. to appear. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Oinas-Kukkonen and M. Harjumaa. A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In H. Oinas-Kukkonen, P. F. V. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, and P. Øhrstrøm, editors, PERSUASIVE, volume 5033 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 164--176. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Reithinger, C. Lauer, and L. Romary. MIAMM-multimodal information access using multiple modalities. In International CLASS Workshop on Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems, 2002.Google Scholar
- W. Wahlster, N. Reithinger, and A. Blocher. Smartkom: Towards multimodal dialogues with anthropomorphic interface agents. In In International Status Conference: Lead Projects Human Computer-Interaction, pages 22--34, 2001.Google Scholar
- M. Weiser. The computer for the 21st century. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., 3(3):3--11, 1999.y Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- MIAA 2011: multimodal interaction for the intelligent environment car
Recommendations
Autonomous Driving: Investigating the Feasibility of Bimodal Take-Over Requests
Autonomous vehicles will need de-escalation strategies to compensate when reaching system limitations. Car-driver handovers can be considered one possible method to deal with system boundaries. The authors suggest a bimodal auditory and visual handover ...
Changes in verbal and nonverbal conversational behavior in long-term interaction
ICMI '12: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interactionWe present an empirical investigation of conversational behavior in dyadic interaction spanning multiple conversations, in the context of a developing interpersonal relationship between a health counselor and her clients. Using a longitudinal video ...
Local danger warnings for drivers: the effect of modality and level of assistance on driver reaction
IUI '10: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfacesLocal danger warning is an important function of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) to improve the safety of driving. The user interface (the warning presentation) is particularly crucial to a successful danger avoidance. We present a user study ...
Comments