skip to main content
10.1145/1943403.1943507acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
technical-note

MIAA 2011: multimodal interaction for the intelligent environment car

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 February 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Automotive development has been dominated by the constraints of driving. However, natural relations to the more general area of Intelligent User Interfaces exist. Previous research in related fields therefore should be adopted and included. The aim of the 2011 MIAA workshop is to foster discussion between experts in otherwise unrelated fields of research. For example, public interfaces use crossmodal referencing in order to circumvent restrictions by the users current focus on a limited communication channel. Our aim is to raise awareness for this approach, concluding that crossmodal references in the car are helpful to bridge the gap between information inside the car and the environment. Another focus topic of the workshop is eco-friendly driving. Although universally regarded as a necessity, it remains an open question how to encourage drivers to drive ecologically. We discuss for example awards for eco-friendly driving by making it competitive and game-like.

References

  1. C. Endres, A. Butz, and A. MacWilliams. A Survey of Software Infrastructures and Frameworks for Ubiquitous Computing. Mobile Information Systems Journal, 1(1):41--80, January-March 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. E. Foster. CoMiC Deliverable 6.1 State of the art review: Multimodal fission, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Meschtscherjakov, D. Wilfinger, T. Scherndl, and M. Tscheligi. Acceptance of future persuasive in-car interfaces towards a more economic driving behaviour. In AutomotiveUI '09: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 81--88, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Müller and G. Weinberg. Multimodal input in the car, today and tomorrow. IEEE Multimedia, 18(1), 2011. to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. H. Oinas-Kukkonen and M. Harjumaa. A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In H. Oinas-Kukkonen, P. F. V. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, and P. Øhrstrøm, editors, PERSUASIVE, volume 5033 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 164--176. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Reithinger, C. Lauer, and L. Romary. MIAMM-multimodal information access using multiple modalities. In International CLASS Workshop on Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. Wahlster, N. Reithinger, and A. Blocher. Smartkom: Towards multimodal dialogues with anthropomorphic interface agents. In In International Status Conference: Lead Projects Human Computer-Interaction, pages 22--34, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Weiser. The computer for the 21st century. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., 3(3):3--11, 1999.y Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. MIAA 2011: multimodal interaction for the intelligent environment car

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '11: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
      February 2011
      504 pages
      ISBN:9781450304191
      DOI:10.1145/1943403

      Copyright © 2011 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 February 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • technical-note

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader