skip to main content
10.1145/1943552.1943559acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of internet path selection on video-QoE

Published: 23 February 2011 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents large scale Internet measurements to understand and improve the effects of Internet path selection on perceived video quality. We systematically study a large number of Internet paths between popular video destinations and clients to create an empirical understanding of location, persistence and recurrence of failures. We map these failures to perceptual quality by reconstructing video clips obtained from the trace to quantify both the perceptual degradations from these failures as well as the fraction of such failures that can be recovered.
We then investigate ways to recover from QoE degradation by choosing one-hop detour paths that preserve application specific policies. We seek simple, scalable path selection strategies without the need for background path monitoring or apriori path knowledge of any kind. To do this, we deployed five measurement overlays: one each in the US, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and two spread across the globe. We used these to stream IP-traces of a variety of clips between source-destination pairs while probing alternate paths for an entire week. Our results indicate that a source can recover from upto 90% of the degradations by attempting to restore QoE with any five randomly chosen nodes in an overlay. We argue that our results are robust across datasets.
Finally, we design and implement a prototype packet forwarding module called source initiated frame restoration (SIFR). We deployed SIFR on PlanetLab nodes, and compared the performance of SIFR with the default Internet routing. We show that SIFR outperforms IP-path selection by providing higher on-screen perceptual quality.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (110223_26192_06_acm.mp4)

References

[1]
D. G. Andersen, H. Balakrishnan, M. F. Kaashoek, R. Morris, "Resilient Overlay Networks", Proc. 18th ACM Symp. on Operating System Principles (SOSP), Banff, Canada, pp. 131--145. Oct 2001.
[2]
S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss, "An Architecture for Differentiated Services", IETF RFC# 2475. Dec. 1998.
[3]
P. Calyam, M. Sridharan, W. Mandrawa, and P. Schopis, "Performance Measurement and Analysis of H.323 Traffic", Passive and Active Measurements (PAM), Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France, pp. 137--146. April 2004.
[4]
M. Cha, P. Rodriguez, J. Crowcroft, S. Moon, and X. Amatriain, "Watching television over an IP network", Proc. ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), Vouliagmeni, Greece, pp. 71--84. Oct. 2008.
[5]
K. Chen, C. Wu, Y. Chang, and C. Lei, "A Crowdsourceable QoE Evaluation Framework for Multimedia Content",. ACM Multimedia (MM), Beijing, China, pp. 491--500. Oct. 2009.
[6]
Cisco White Paper, "Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2008--2013", Cisco Inc. Available: www.cisco.com. July 2009.
[7]
A. Czumaj and V. Stemann, "Randomized Allocation Processes", Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, Miami, FL. Oct. 1997.
[8]
D. Eager, E. Lazowska, and J. Zahorjan, "Adaptive load sharing in homogeneous distributed systems", IEEE Trans. on Software Engg., vol. 12(5), pp. 747--760. May 1986.
[9]
J. Greengrass, J. Evans, and A. C. Begen, "Not All Packets Are Equal, Part I: Streaming Video Coding and SLA Requirements", IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 13(1), pp. 70--75. March 2009.
[10]
J. Greengrass, J. Evans, and A. C. Begen, "Not All Packets Are Equal, Part II: The Impact of Network Packet Loss on Video Quality", IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 13(2), pp. 74--82. March 2009.
[11]
M. Goodman, "Internet Video Forecast: Broadband Emerges as an Alternative Channel for Video Distribution" Yankee group, 2006.
[12]
K. Gummadi, H. Madhyastha, S. Gribble, H. Levy, and D. Wetherall, "Improving the reliability of internet paths with one-hop source routing", Proc. Operating System Design and Implementation (OSDI), San Fransico, CA, pp. 13--26. Dec. 2004.
[13]
International Telecommunication Union, "Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications", Rec. ITU-T P.910, Sept. 1999.
[14]
R. Jain, "Quality of Experience", IEEE Multimedia, vol. 11(1), pp. 95--96, March 2004.
[15]
J. Jannotti, D. Gifford, K. Johnson, M. F. Kaashoek, and J. O'Toole, "Overcast: Reliable Multicasting with an Overlay Network", Proc. Operating System Design and Implementation (OSDI), San Diego, CA, pp. 14--27. Oct. 2000.
[16]
S. Kanumuri, P. C. Cosman, A. R. Reibman, and V. A. Vaishampayan, "Modeling packet-loss visibility in MPEG-2 video", IEEE Trans. on Multimedia, vol. 8(2), pp. 341--355, April 2006.
[17]
C. Labovitz, R. Malan, and F. Jahanian, "Internet Routing Instability", IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 6(5), pp. 515--528, Oct. 1998.
[18]
C. Labovitz, R. Malan, and F. Jahanian, "Internet Routing Instability", IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 6(5), pp. 515--528, Oct. 1998.
[19]
C. Lumezanu, D. Levin, and N. Spring, "PeerWise Discovery and Negotiation of Faster Paths", ACM HotNets, Atlanta, GA. Nov. 2007.
[20]
V. Paxson, "End-to-end routing behavior in the Internet", IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 5(5), pp. 601--615, 1997.
[21]
M. H. Pinson and S. Wolf, "A New Standardized Method for Objectively Measuring Video Quality", IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, vol. 50(3), pp. 312--322. Sept 2003.
[22]
S. Savage et. al., "Detour: A Case for informed internet routing and transport", IEEE Micro, vol. 19(1), pp. 50--59. Jan. 1999.
[23]
M. Siller and J. Woods, "QoS arbitration for improving the QoE in multimedia transmission", Proc. Intl. Conf. on Visual Information Engineering (VIE), Guildfor, UK, pp. 238--241. July 2003.
[24]
L. Subramanian, S. Agarwal, J. Rexford, and R. H. Katz, "Characterizing the Internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points", IEEE Infocom, New York, NY, pp. 618--627. June 2002.
[25]
L. Subramanian, I. Stoica, H. Balakrishnan, and R. Katz, "OverQoS: An Overlay Based Architecture for Enhancing Internet QoS", Usenix Network System Design and Implementation (NSDI), San Fransisco, CA, pp. 4--17. March 2004.
[26]
S. Tasaka, H. Yoshimi, A. Hirashima, and T. Nunome, "The Effectiveness of a QoE-Based Video Output Scheme for Audio-Video IP Transmission", ACM Multimedia (MM), Vancouver, Canada, pp. 259--268. Oct. 2008.
[27]
Akamai Inc., http://www.akamai.com
[28]
Ineoquest Singulus G1-T Equipment. www.ineoquest.com/singulus-family.
[29]
PlanetLab Consortium. http://www.planet-lab.org/
[30]
VLC Media Player, http://www.videolan.org/vlc
[31]
Video Clips and PlanetLab Vantage points used in this paper. http://sites.google.com/site/anonqoe/

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)A QoE study of different stream and layout configurations in video conferencing under limited network conditions2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)10.1109/QoMEX.2015.7148085(1-6)Online publication date: May-2015
  • (2014)Effects of internet path selection on video-QoEIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)10.1109/TNET.2013.225783822:3(689-702)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014
  • (2012)A case for a coordinated internet video control planeACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2377677.237775242:4(359-370)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2012
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Effects of internet path selection on video-QoE

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MMSys '11: Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Multimedia systems
    February 2011
    294 pages
    ISBN:9781450305181
    DOI:10.1145/1943552
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 February 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. internet
    2. multimedia
    3. quality of experience

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    MMSYS '11
    Sponsor:
    MMSYS '11: MMSYS '11 - Multimedia Systems Conference
    February 23 - 25, 2011
    CA, San Jose, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 176 of 530 submissions, 33%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2015)A QoE study of different stream and layout configurations in video conferencing under limited network conditions2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)10.1109/QoMEX.2015.7148085(1-6)Online publication date: May-2015
    • (2014)Effects of internet path selection on video-QoEIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)10.1109/TNET.2013.225783822:3(689-702)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014
    • (2012)A case for a coordinated internet video control planeACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2377677.237775242:4(359-370)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2012
    • (2012)A case for a coordinated internet video control planeProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2012 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication10.1145/2342356.2342431(359-370)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2012
    • (2011)When multi-touch meets streamingProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/2107596.2107599(23-32)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2011
    • (2011)QoE-based packet dropper controllers for multimedia streaming in WiMAX networksProceedings of the 6th Latin America Networking Conference10.1145/2078216.2078219(12-19)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2011

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media