skip to main content
10.1145/1952222.1952236acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Heterogeneities and complexities in IS design: still a need to juxtapose organizational elements and design related ideas?

Published:22 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Designing sustainable information systems in healthcare organizations is difficult. Despite large efforts, many systems do not meet their expectations during implementation. While it is widely assumed that information systems are "tools" made to improve organizational outcomes, this paper suggests that successful implementations only are obtained when technology are able to juxtapose with existing organizational structures. The aim of the paper is to contribute with insight about how mutuality between technology and organizations can be realized. Empirically, the study is based upon electronic laboratory requests in healthcare.

References

  1. Ackerman, M. S. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 15, Issue 2 & 3, (2000), 179--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Akrich, M. The de-scription of technical objects. In Biiker and Law (eds.). Shaping technology/Building Society. MIT Press, Cambridge, (1992), 205--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ash, J. S., Berg, M. and Coiera, E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. Mar-Apr;11(2), (2004), 104--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg, M. Health Information Management, Integrating information technology in health care work. Routledge Health Management Series, London, (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Braverman, H. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, Monthly Review Press, New York, (1974).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bødker, K., F. Kensing, and Simonsen, J. Participatory IT design: Designing for business and workplace realities. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chantler, C., Clarke, T. and Granger, R. Information Technology in the English National Health Service. JAMA 2006;296(18) (2006), 2255--2258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen, M. C. and Remler, D. Information and Communication Technology in U. S. Health Care: Why is Adoption So Slow and Is Slower Better? Journal of Health Politics, policy and Law 34 (6): (2009), 1011--1034.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cross M. and MacGregor, J: Cutting the wires: mobile IT and the transformation of local services and governance. London: National Local Government Network; (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellingsen G. and Monteiro, E. Seamless Integration: Standardisation across Multiple Local Settings, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Volume 15, Numbers 5--6 December, (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Forsythe, D. E. It's Just a Matter of Common Sense: Ethnography as Invisible Work, Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 8, (1999), 127--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gasser L. The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Volume 4, Issue 3, (July 1986). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Grimson, J, Grimson, W. and Hasselbring W. The SI Challenge in health care. Communication of the ASM, Vol. 43, Issue 6, (2000), 48--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hanseth, O. And Ciborra, C. Risk, Complexities and ICT. Edward Elgar Publishing, Massachusetts, USA, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Harper, R. H. R.: The Organisation in Ethnography: A Discussion of Ethnographic Fieldwork Programs in CSCW. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 9, no. 2, (2000), 239--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hasselbring, W. Information system integration. Communication of the ACM, vol 43, No 6 (2000), 32--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Heathfield, H., Pitty, D. and Hanka, R. Information in practice Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges, BMJ, 316, 27, (1998), 1959--1961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Heeks, R. Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation", International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75, (2006), 125--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hollingworth, W., Devine, E. B., Hansen, R. N., Lawless, N. M., Comstock, B. A., Wilson-Norton, J. L., Tharp, K. L. and Sullivan, S. D. "The impact of e-prescribing on Prescriber and Staff Time in Ambulatory Care Clinics: A Time Motion Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 14, (2007), 722--730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Huges, T. P. The Evolution of Large Technical Systems. In Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Huges and Trevor Pinch (Eds.). The Social Construction of Technological Systems. The MIT Press, (1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, T., Dobrev, A., Stroetmann, K., A., Cameron, J. and Morris, L. Report on the socio-economic impact of NHS Scotland's Emergency Care Summary- Final Draft, Version 10, November 2008. Europeian Commision Information Society and Media, (2008), 1--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein, M. K. and Myers, M. D. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems, MIS Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 1, (1999), 67--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Latour, B. Science in Action. Harward University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, (1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Latour, B. Reassembling the social, an introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford University Press, Gosport, Hampshire, (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Law, J. Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion, in W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, The MIT Press, (1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Littlejohns, P., Wyatt J. C., and Garvican, L. Information in practice. Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt. BMJ, Volume 326, (2003), 860--863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. March, J.G. Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Querterly 26, (1981), 563--577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Markus M. L. and Robey, D. Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research. Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 5, (1988), 583--598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Orlikowski, W.J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, Vol 3, No 3, (1992a) 398--427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Orlikowski, W.J. Learning from Notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work Proceedings of the 1992 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (1992b) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Robey, D., Sahay, S. Transforming Work through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government. Information System Research, vol. 7, no. 1, (1996), 93--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Scandurra, I, Hægglund, M. and Koch, S. "From user needs to system specifications: Multi-disciplinary thematic seminars as a collaborative design method for development of health information systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 41 (2008), 557--569. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Schuler, D. and A. Namioka, Participatory design, Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. SSD, Swedish Social Departement. National ICT strategy (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Suchman, L. A. "Practice-Based Design of Information Systems: Notes from the Hyperdeveloped World", The Information Society, 18, (2002), 139--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Suomi, R. Streamlining Operation in Health Care with ICT. In Stegwee and Spil, Strategies for health care information systems (2001), Idea Group Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Te@mwork, Norwegian Ministries of Health Social Affairs: Te@mwork (2007) - Implementation Plan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Varshney, U., "Pervasive Healthcare Computing: EMR/EHR, WIRELESS and HEALTH MONITORING, Springer Science +Business Media, LLC (2009), chapter 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Walsham, G. Interpretive Case Studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4, (1995), 74--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Winthereik, B. R. and Bansler, J. P. Special issue: Connecting practices: ICT infrastructures to support integrated care. International Journal of Integrated Care, Vol 7, 16 May, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Heterogeneities and complexities in IS design: still a need to juxtapose organizational elements and design related ideas?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        OZCHI '10: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction
        November 2010
        462 pages
        ISBN:9781450305020
        DOI:10.1145/1952222

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 November 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader