skip to main content
10.1145/1952222.1952288acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conversational management of network trouble perturbations in personal videoconferencing

Published:22 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Domestic personal videoconferencing (PV) is vulnerable to network trouble perturbations. This paper shows that long-distance couples treat perturbations as a matter of social management as much as technological resolution. Three management strategies are illustrated: technology-oriented remedies, content-oriented remedies, and non-remedial accounts for trouble. All three involve collaborative work to account for the effect of technology on conversational continuity and the relationship.

References

  1. Ames, M. G., Go, J., Kaye, J. J., & Spasojevic, M. Making love in the network closet: the benefits and work of family videochat. In Proc. CSCW 2010. ACM Press (2010), 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bell, C., & Brauer-Bell, K. (2006). The long-distance relationship survival guide: secrets and strategies from successful couples who have gone the distance. Ten Speed Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R. B., Parrish, R. N., & Weeks, G. D. Studies in interactive communication: I. The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem solving. Human Factors, 14 (1972), 487--509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Clayman, S.E., & Gill, V.T. Conversation Analysis. In M. A. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (2004), 589--606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dourish, P. Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press (2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V. & Henderson, A. Your place or mine? Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5, 1 (1996), 33--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hashimoto, Y & Ishibashi, Y. Influences of network latency on interactivity in networked rock-paper-scissors. In NETGAMES 2006. 23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Heath, C., & Luff, P. Technology in action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Horn, D.B., Karasik, L., & Olsen, J.S. The effects of spatial and temporal video distortion on lie detection performance. In CHI 2002 Ext. Abstracts. ACM Press (2002), 714--715. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Horrigan, J., & Jones, S. (2008). When technology fails. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Isaacs, E.A. & Tang, J.C. What video can and can't do for collaboration: A case study. In Readings in Multimedia Computing and Networking, K. Jeffay and H. Zhang, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA (2001), 554--564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jackson, M., Anderson, A.H., McEwan, R., & Mullin, J. Impact of video frame rate on communicative behaviour in two and four party groups. Proc. CSCW 2000. ACM Press (2000), 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Latifi, R. (Ed.). Current principles and practices of telemedicine and e-Health. Amsterdam: IOS Press (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu, Y., Zhao, Y. Kuipers, F.A., & Van Mieghem, P. Measurement study of multi-party video conferencing. In Proc. IFIP Networking, 2010. LNCS 6091 (2010), 96--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Monk, A.F. & Watts, L.A poor quality video link affects speech but not gaze. In Conf. Comp. of CHI 1995. ACM Press (1995), 274--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Nielsen, J. & Landauer, T.K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proc. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conference. ACM Press: 206--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Poole, E.S., Chetty, M., Morgan, T., Grinter, R.E., & Edwards, W. K. Computer help at home: methods and motivations for informal technical support. Proc. Human factors in computing systems, 2009, ACM Press (2009), 739--748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruhleder, K. & Jordan, B. Co-constructing non-mutual realities: Delay-generated trouble in distributed interaction. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 10, 1 (2001), 113--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Schiano, D. J., Ehrlich, S. M., & Sheridan, K. Categorical perception of facial affect: An illusion. In Proc. CHI 2001. ACM Press (2001), 299--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Taylor, P., & Keeter, S. (2010). Millennials: A Portrait of Generation Next. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Walther, J.B., Gay, G., & Hancock, J.T. How do communication and technology researchers study the Internet? Journal of Communication, 55 (2005), 632--657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Watson, A. & Sasse, M.A. The good, the bad, and the muffled: The impact of different degradations on internet speech. In Proc. MULTIMEDIA 2000. ACM Press (2000), 269--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yarosh, S. Supporting parent-child interaction in divorced families. In Proc. Interaction design and children. ACM Press (2008), 33--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Conversational management of network trouble perturbations in personal videoconferencing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OZCHI '10: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction
      November 2010
      462 pages
      ISBN:9781450305020
      DOI:10.1145/1952222

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 November 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader