skip to main content
10.1145/1952222.1952328acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social software and interactions in web design: an in situ exploration of tools & methods to support designer-client communication

Published:22 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper outlines the scope, approach and current progress of a thesis which is investigating the role that Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) plays in supporting the design process within the web design industry. Specifically, the thesis investigates designerclient communication, and explores the issues with technologies to support this communication. This research is situated within the field of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

Web design businesses use a variety of CMC tools to support communication with their clients; however they must rely on general purpose tools which the client has prior knowledge of. Social Software solutions which can better support these processes have yet to become adopted within the industry. The research question for this work is how can Social Software be better designed to support designer-client communication within web design businesses?

A platform that facilitates the creation of Social Software will be designed, deployed and evaluated in situ to investigate the problems and opportunities for Social Software within this space. An iterative design process will be used to develop and evaluate the platform through the use of ethnographic action research and design thinking methods. The aim of the platform is to reduce the challenges of introducing new software into web design businesses, and evaluate the platform through participatory design studies of developing new tools which better support the design process. The results of the platform will be used to inform a design framework for Social Software designers wanting to develop tools to support communication in this context.

References

  1. Bannon, L. J., & Schmidt, K. (1991). CSCW: Four Characters in Search of a Context. Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 3--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brickman, A., Yu, L., Maria, J. S., Meyer, E., Stevens, K., & Zeldman, J. (2008). A LIST APART Survey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Diffily, S. (2008). Educate Your Stakeholders! A List Apart Retrieved 15 March 2010, from http://www.alistapart.com/articles/educatingstak eholdersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dorn, B., & Guzdial, M. (2010). Learning on the job: characterizing the programming knowledge and learning strategies of web designers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dourish, P. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 8(1), 19--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dourish, P., & Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Duyne, D. K. V., Landay, J., & Hong, J. I. (2002). The Design of Sites: Patterns, Principles, and Processes for Crafting a Customer-Centered Web Experience: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. (1991). Groupware: some issues and experiences. Commun. ACM, 34(1), 39--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fitzpatrick, G., Mansfield, T., & Kaplan, S. M. (1996). Locales Framework: Exploring Foundations for Collaboration Support. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '96). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Greenberg, S. (2001). Context as a dynamic construct. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 16(2), 257--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Commun. ACM, 37(1), 92--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think Fourth Edition: The Design Process Demystified (Vol. 4): Architectural PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. McAfee., A. P. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 21--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nardi, B. (1995). Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Newman, M., & Landay, J. A. (2000). Sitemaps, storyboards, and specifications: a sketch of Web site design practice. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. O'Reilly, T. (2007). What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (MPRA Paper): University Library of Munich, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Penichet, V. M. R., Marin, I., Gallud, J. A., Lozano, M. D., & Tesoriero, R. (2007). A Classification Method for CSCW Systems. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., 168, 237--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Roseman, M., & Greenberg, S. (1996). Building real-time groupware with GroupKit, a groupware toolkit. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 3(1), 66--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Shirky, C. (2003). A Group Is Its Own Worst Enemy. published July 1, 2003 on the "Networks, Economics, and Culture" mailing list from http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tacchi, J. A., Hearn, G. N., & Ninan, A. (2004). Ethnographic action research: A method for implementing and evaluating new media technologies. In K. Prasad (Ed.), Information and Communication Technology: Recasting Development: B.R. Publishing Corporation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Social software and interactions in web design: an in situ exploration of tools & methods to support designer-client communication

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        OZCHI '10: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction
        November 2010
        462 pages
        ISBN:9781450305020
        DOI:10.1145/1952222

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 November 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader