Sarah Hug
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the benefits of Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL), an NSF-sponsored program in the sciences, to peer leaders serving in the Computing Alliance for Hispanic Serving Institutions (CAHSI). Beyond the benefits to students enrolled in the PLTL courses, survey findings show the majority of peer leaders report increased self-efficacy in teaching computer science, improved content knowledge, and better communication and leadership skills following a semester of leading PLTL. Results from this diverse group of leaders indicate no differences in gains between underrepresented minority and majority students, suggesting the program may provide a path for improving retention of underrepresented groups in the field.
- Gosser, D.K., Cracolice, M. S. Kampmeier, J. A., Roth, V., Strozak, V.A., and Varma-Nelson P. 2001. Peer-Led Team Learning: A Guidebook, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
- Roach, S., Villa, E., 2007. Reaching out across disciplines: learning from each other to produce more graduates in computer science, In Second Annual Technology Workforce Development Workshop: Best Practices 2007, 6--7, 2007.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. 1991. Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN.Google Scholar
- Ball, D.L, & Bass, H. 2000. Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In Multiple perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics, J. Boaler Ed. Ablex, Westport, CT.Google Scholar
- Loui, M. C., & Robbins, B. A. (2008). Work-in-progress: assessment of peer-led team learning in an engineering course for freshmen. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, N.Y., October 22--25, 2008 (pp. F1F-7--F1F-8).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Biggers, M., Yilmaz, T. & Sweat, M. 2009. Using collaborative modified peer-led team learning to improve student success and retention in intro CS. In SIGCSE'09, March 3--7, 2009, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Horwitz, S., Rodger, S.H., Biggers, M., Binkley, D., Frantz, C.K., Gundermann, D., Hambrusch, S., Huss-Lederman, S., Munson, E., Ryder, B., & Sweat, M. 2009. Using peer-led team learning to increase participation and success of under-represented groups in introductory computer science. In SIGCSE'09, March 3--7, 2009, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huss-Lederman, S., Chinn, D., & Skrentny, J. 2008. Serious fun:peer-led team learning in CS. In February 2008 SIGCSE Bulletin Volume 40 Issue 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sperry, R. A. and Tedford, P. 2008. Implementing peer-led team learning in introductory computer science courses. J. Comput. Small Coll. 23, 6 (Jun. 2008), 30--35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tien,L., Roth, V., Kampmeier, J. 2004. A course to prepare peer leaders to implement a student-assisted learning method. In J. Chem. Educ. 81, 1313--1321.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amaral, K. E.; Vala, M. 2009. What teaching teaches: mentoring and the performance gains of mentors . In J. Chem. Educ, 86, 630--633.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gafney, L. Varma-Nelson, P. 2007. Evaluating peer-led team learning:a study of long-term effects on former workshop leaders. In J. Chem. Educ. 84, 535--539.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Micari, M., Streitwieser, B., & Light, G. 2005. Undergraduates leading undergraduates: peer facilitation in a science workshop program. In Innovative Higher Education, 30(4), 269--288.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Seymour, E., and N. Hewitt (1994). Talking about leaving: Factors contributing to high attrition rates among science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors. Boulder, CO: Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
- Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. 1990. Toward the development of an elementary teacher's Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument. In Science Education, 74, 625--637.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Krosnick, J. A. & Fabrigar, L. R. 1997. Designing Rating Scales for Effective Measurement in Surveys. In Survey measurement and process quality. New York: Wiley, 1997, pp. 141--64.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). 2009. Criteria for accrediting computing programs: Effective for evaluations during the 2010--2011 accreditation cycle. Retrieved August 17, 2010. http://www.abet.org/Linked%20DocumentsUPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/C001%201011%20CAC%20Criteria%2011--16-09.pdf .Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Learning to love computer science: peer leaders gain teaching skill, communicative ability and content knowledge in the CS classroom
Recommendations
How Student Centered is the Computer Science Classroom? A Survey of College Faculty
Student-centered instructional practices structure a class so that students interact with each other, engage deeply with the content, and receive formative feedback. These evidence-based practices benefit all students but are particularly effective with ...
Peer instruction in computer science at small liberal arts colleges
ITiCSE '13: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationPeer Instruction (PI) has been shown to be successful at improving pass-rates and improving retention of majors in large classes at large research-intensive institutions. At these institutions, students have been shown to learn from peer discussion in ...
Engaging Non-Traditional Students in Computer Science through Socially-Inspired Learning and Sustained Mentoring
SIGCSE '15: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationThis paper describes a new program for attracting non-traditional students into computer science and retaining them through sustained peer and faculty mentoring. The program is centered on socially-inspired learning, - learning in and for a community. ...
Comments