Morgan G. Ames
Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye
ABSTRACT
This ethnographic study of 22 diverse families in the San Francisco Bay Area provides a holistic account of parents' attitudes about their children's use of technology. We found that parents from different socioeconomic classes have different values and practices around technology use, and that those values and practices reflect structural differences in their everyday lives. Calling attention to class differences in technology use challenges the prevailing practice in human-computer interaction of designing for those similar to oneself, which often privileges middle-class values and practices. By discussing the differences between these two groups and the advantages of researching both, this research highlights the benefits of explicitly engaging with socioeconomic status as a category of analysis in design.
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Children, adolescents, and television. Pediatrics 107:2, 2001, 423--426.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Ames, M.G., Go, J., Kaye, J.J., and Spasojevic, M. Making Love in the Network Closet: The Benefits and Work of Family Videochat. Proc. CSCW 2010, 145--154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brewer, E., Demmer, M., & Du, B. The Case for Technology in Developing Regions. Computer 38:6, 2005, 25--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bryant, J. and Bryant, A. Television and the American Family. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.Google Scholar
- Carvajal, D. Growing concern over safety of cellphones for children. New York Times, March 7, 2008.Google Scholar
- Cockton, G. A development framework for value-centred design. Ext. Abs. CHI 2005, 1292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dillahunt, T., Mankoff, J., Paulos, E., and Fussell, S.R. It's Not All About "Green": Energy Use in Low-Income Communities. Proc. UbiComp 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., & Borning, A. Value-Sensitive Design and Information Systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta, Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations. M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2006.Google Scholar
- Garfinkel, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, 1967.Google Scholar
- Gauntlett, D. and Hill, A. TV Living: Television, Culture, and Everyday Life. Routledge, London, 1999.Google Scholar
- 1Gilbert, D. The American Class Structure in an Age of Growing Inequality. Wadsworth, 2002.Google Scholar
- Grimes, A. and Harper, R. Celebratory technology. Proc. CHI 2008, 467--476. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guernsey, L. Into the Minds of Babes: How Screen Time Affects Children from Birth to Age Five. Basic Books, 2007.Google Scholar
- Hall, S. The Spectacle of the 'Other.' In Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. Sage Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
- Hutchinson, H. and et al. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design For and With Families. Proc. CHI 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lareau, A. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Univ. of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- Le Dantec, C. Exploring mobile technologies for the urban homeless. Ext. Abs. CHI 2010, 2883--2886. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Le Dantec, C.A., Poole, E.S., and Wyche, S.P. Values as lived experience. Proc. CHI 2009, 1141--1150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morley, D. Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure. Routledge, 1986.Google Scholar
- Nippert-Eng, C. Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Univ. of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
- 2Papert, S. The Connected Family: Bridging the digital generation gap. Longstreet Press, 1996.Google Scholar
- 2Rouse, R. Mexican Migration and the Social Space of Postmodernism. In J.X. Indu and R. Rosaldo, The Anthropology of Globalization. Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar
- Saxenian, A. The New Argonauts. Harvard Univ. Press, 2001.Google Scholar
- Spigel, L. Make room for TV: Television and the family ideal in postwar America. Univ. of Chicago Press, 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suchman, L. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Voida, A. and Mynatt, E. Conveying User Values between Families and Designers. Design, 2005, 2013--2016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar
- Willis, P. and Aronowitz, S. Learning to Labour. Columbia Univ. Press, 1983..Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Understanding technology choices and values through social class
Recommendations
Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsUnderstanding users becomes increasingly complicated when we grapple with various overlapping attributes of an individual's identity. In this paper we introduce intersectionality as a framework for engaging with the complexity of users' "and authors" "...
Income, race, and class: exploring socioeconomic differences in family technology use
CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMinorities are the fastest growing demographic in the U.S. and the poverty level in the U.S. is the highest it has been in 50 years. We interviewed middle to upper class, suburban, white American parents and low-income, urban, African-American parents ...
"Its Changes so Often": Parental Non-/Use of Mobile Devices While Caring for Infants and Toddlers at Home
CSCW2Parents' use of mobile devices (tablets and mobile phones) while caring for children is considered to be beneficial, but also problematic. In this study, we aimed to understand parents' technology non-/use practices around infants and toddlers in the ...
Comments