Gitte Lindgaard
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Extremely high correlations between repeated judgments of visual appeal of homepages shown for 50 milliseconds have been interpreted as evidence for a mere exposure effect [Lindgaard et al. 2006]. Continuing that work, the present research had two objectives. First, it investigated the relationship between judgments differing in cognitive demands. Second, it began to identify specific visual attributes that appear to contribute to different judgments. Three experiments are reported. All used the stimuli and viewing time as before. Using a paradigm known to disrupt processing beyond the stimulus offset, Experiment 1 was designed to ensure that the previous findings could not be attributed to such continued processing. Adopting a within-subject design, Experiment 2 investigated the extent to which judgments differing in cognitive demands (visual appeal, perceived usability, trustworthiness) may be driven by the visual characteristics of a Web page. It also enabled analyses of visual attributes that contributed most to the different judgments. Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 2 but using a between-subject design to ensure that no practice effect could occur. The results suggest that all three types of judgments are largely driven by visual appeal, but that cognitively demanding judgments are processed in a qualitatively different manner than visual appeal, and that they rely on somewhat different visual attributes. A model accounting for the results is provided.
- Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
- Anderson, N. H. 1980. Foundations of Information Integration Theory. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Anderson, N. H. 1981. Methods of Information Integration Theory. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Averbach, E. and Sperling, G. 1961. Short term storage of information in vision. In Information Theory, C. Cherry Ed., Butterworth, London, 196--211.Google Scholar
- Badre, A. 2000. The effects of cross cultural interface design orientation on World Wide Web user performance. GVU Tech. rep. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/reports/2001/.Google Scholar
- Basso, A. Goldberg, D., Greenspan, S., and Weimer, D. 2001. First impressions: Emotional and cognitive factors underlying judgments of trust in e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. ACM Press, New York, 143--147. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baudouin, J. Y. and Tiberghien, G. 2004. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol. 117, 3, 313--332.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bezanson, W. 2007. The Life of Phi: Beauty and the Golden Ratio. Baico Publishers, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
- Behrens, R. R. 1984. Design in the Visual Arts. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
- Ben-Bassat, T., Meher, J., and Tractinsky, N. 2006. Economic and subjective measures of the perceived value of aesthetics and usability, ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 13, 2, 210--234. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Best, L., Hunter, A. C., and Stewart, B. M. 2006. Perceiving relationships: A physiological examination of the perception of scatterplotts. In Diagrams, D. Barker-Plummer et al. Eds., Springer, Berlin, 244--257. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bloch, P. H., Brunel, F. F., and Arnold, T. J. 2003. Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. J. Consum. Res. 29, 551--565.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bornstein, R. F. 1992. Subliminal mere exposure effects. In Perception Without Awareness: Cognitive, Clinical, and Social Perspectives, R. F. Bornstein and T. S. Pittman Eds., The Guilford Press, New York, 191--210.Google Scholar
- Brady, L. and Phillips, C. 2003. Aesthetics and usability: A look at color and balance. Usabil. News 5, 1, 1--4.Google Scholar
- Breitemeier, B. G. and Ogmen, H. 2000. Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Percept.Psychophys. 62, 8, 1572--1595.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Buxton, B. 2005. Experience design vs. interface design. Rotman Mag. Winter, 47--49.Google Scholar
- Callahan, E. 2006. Cultural similarities and differences in the design of university Web sites. J. Comput.-Mediat. Comm. 11, 239--273.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carroll, J. M. and Mentis, H. M. 2008. The useful interface experience: The role and transformation of usability. In Product Experience, H. H. J. Schiffstein and P. Hekkert Eds., Elsevier, North-Holland, the Netherlands, 499--515.Google Scholar
- Cheskin Research Group. 1999. eCommerce trust study. http://www.cheskin.com/think/studies/ecommtrust.html.Google Scholar
- Clore, G. L., Wyer, R. S. Jr., Dienes, B., Gasper, K., Gohm, C., and Isbell, L. 2001. Affective feelings as feedback: Some cognitive consequences. In Theories of Mood and Cognition: A User's Guidebook, L. L. Martin and G. L. Clore Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 27--62.Google Scholar
- Cyr, D., HEad, M., Larios, H. and Pan, B. 2006. Exploring human images in website design across cultures: A multi-method approach. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS. ICIS, 55--59.Google Scholar
- Cyr, D. and Trevor-Smith, H. 2004. Localization of Web design: An empirical comparison of German, Japanese, and U.S. website characteristics. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 55, 13, 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Damaiso, A. 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar
- Damaiso, A. R. 2000. A second chance for emotion. In Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotions, R. D. Lane and L. Nadel Eds., Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13, 3, 319--340.Google ScholarDigital Library
- De Angeli, A., Sutcliffe, A., and Hartmann, J. 2006. Interaction, usability and aesthetics: What influences users' preferences? In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS). ACM Press, New York, 271--280. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Desmet, P. and HEkkert, P. 2007. Framework of product experience. Int. J. Des. 1, 1, 1--12.Google Scholar
- Diefenbach, S. and Hassenzahl, M. 2008. Give me a reason: Hedonic product choice and justification. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08). ACM Press, New York, 3051--3056. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Diefenbach, S. and Hassenzahl, M. 2009. The beauty dilemma: Beauty is valued but discounted in product choice. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09). ACM Press, New York, 1419--1426. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dion, K., Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. 1972. What is beautiful is good. J. Person. Social Psychol. 24, 285--290.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dumaine, B. 1991. Design that sells and sells and… Fortune. March 11, 42--49.Google Scholar
- Eddy, D. M. 1999. Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, D. Kahneman et al. Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Egger, F. N. 2002. Consumer trust in e-commerce: From psychology to interaction design. In Trust in Electronic Commerce: The Role of Trust from a Legal, an Organizational, and a Technical Point of View, J. E. J. Prins et al. Eds., Kluwer Law International, Norwell, MA. 11--44.Google Scholar
- Elliott, R. and Dolan, R. J. 1998. Neural responses during preference and memory judgments for subliminally presented stimuli: A functional neuro-imaging study. J. Neurosci. 18, 4697--4704.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Enns, J. T. and Di Lollo, V. 2000. What's new in visual masking? Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 9, 345--352.Google Scholar
- Fernandes, G., Lindgaard, G., Dillon, R., and Wood, J. 2003. Judging the appeal of Web sites. In Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on the Management of Electronic Commerce.Google Scholar
- Fogg, B. J., Kameda, T. Boyd, J., Marchall, J., Sethi, R., Sockol, M., and Trowbridge, T. 2002. Stanford-Markovsky Web credibility study: Investigating what makes Web sites credible today. Tech. rep., Persuasive Technology Lab, Stanford University, CA.Google Scholar
- Frohlich, D. M. 2004. Beauty as a design prize. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19, 359--386. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Galitz. W. G. 2007. The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques. Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis, IN. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Garber, L., Hyatt, E. M., and Boya, U. O. 2008, The mediating effect of the appearance of nondurable consumer goods and their packaging on consumer behavior. In Product Experience, H. H. J. Schiffstein and P. Hekkert Eds., Elsevier, North-Holland, the Netherlands. 581--602.Google Scholar
- Garrett, J. J. 2003. The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web. New Riders Publishers, Indianapolis, IN. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Griffith, D. A., Krampf, R. F., and Palmer, J. W. 2001. The role of interface in electronic commerce: Consumer involvement with print versus on-line catalogs. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 5, 35--47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- HallnäS, L. and Redström, J. 2002. From use to presence: On the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 9, 2, 106--124. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hammer, O. and Harper, D. A. T. 2005. Past, version 1.32. http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/.Google Scholar
- Handy, C. 1995. Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. May-June, 40.Google Scholar
- Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., and De Angeli, A. 2007. Investigating attractiveness in Web user interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07). 387--396. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., and De Angeli, A. 2008. Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15, 4, 15-1--15-30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M. 2004. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19, 4, 319--349. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M. 2008. Aesthetics in interactive products: Correlates and consequences of beauty. In Product Experience, H. H. J. Schiffstein and P. Hekkert Eds., Elsevier, North-Holland, the Netherlands, 287--298.Google Scholar
- Hemenway, P. 2005. Divine Proportion: Phi In Art, Nature, and Science. Sterling Books, New York, 20--21.Google Scholar
- Hollins, B. and Pugh, S. 1990. Successful Product Design. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
- Jacobson, T. 2004. Individual and group modeling of aesthetic judgment strategies. Brit. J. Psychol. 95, 1, 41--56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacobson, T. and Höfel, L. 2002. Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: Analyses of individual judgments. Percept. Motor Skills 95, 3, 755--766.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacobson, T. and Höfel, L. 2003. Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 3, 4, 289--299.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacobson, T. and Höfel, L. 2007a. Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes. Int. J. Psychophys. 65, 20--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacobson, T. and Höfel, L. 2007b. Electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics: A result of judgment categorization or judgment report?. J. Psychophys. 21, 1, 9--21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jordan, P. W. 2001. Pleasure with products: Human factors for body, mind, and soul. In Human Factors in Product Design: Current Practice and Future Trends, W. S. Green and P. W. Jordan Eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 206--217.Google Scholar
- Karvonen, K. 2000. The beauty of simplicity. In Proceedings of the Conference on Universal Usability. ACM Press, New York, 85--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaufman, A. S. 1994. Tests of intelligence. In The Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence, vol. 2, R. J. Sternberg Ed., Macmillan Publishing Company, 828--833.Google Scholar
- Kim, J., Lee, J., and Choi, D. 2003. Designing emotionally evocative homepages: An empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotional dimensions. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Studies 59, 899--940. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koffka, K. 1955. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Routledge and Kegan Publishing, London.Google Scholar
- Kosslyn, S. M. 1989. Understanding charts and graphs. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 3, 185--226.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kovacs, G., Vogels, R., and Orban, G. A. 1995. Cortical correlate of backward masking. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5587--5591.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lalomia, M. J. and Sidowski, J. B. 1990. Measurements of computer satisfaction, literacy, and aptitudes: A review. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, 3, 231--253.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lauer, D. A. and Pentak, S. 2002. Design Basics. Wadsworth, Sydney, Australia. Chapter 5, Balance.Google Scholar
- Lauer, D. A. and Pentak, S. 2007. Design Basics. Thomson Wadsworth, Sydney, Australia. Chapter 5, Balance.Google Scholar
- Lavie, T. and Tractinsky, N. 2004. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of Web sites. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Studies 6, 269--298. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ledoux, J. 1992. Emotion and the amygdale. In The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Mystery, and Mental Dysfunction, J. P. Aggleton Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 339--351.Google Scholar
- Ledoux, J. 1996. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
- Lidwell, W., Holden, K., and Butler, J. 2003. Universal Principles of Design: A Cross-Disciplinary Reference. Rockport Publishers, Gloucester, MA.Google Scholar
- Lindgaard, G. and Dudek, C. 2002. User satisfaction, aesthetics and usability: Beyond reductionism. In Proceedings of the IFIP 17th World Computer Congress. 231--246. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., and Brown, J. 2006. Attention Web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression!, Behav. Inf. Technol. 25, 115--126.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lindgaard, G., Folkens, J., Pyper, C., Frize, M., and Walker, R. 2010. Contributions of psychology to the design of diagnostic decision support systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP TC 13 Human-Computer Interaction Symposium (HCIS'10). (Held as part of WCC'10). 15--26.Google Scholar
- Lindgaard, G. and Whitfield, A. 2004. Integrating aesthetics within an evolutionary and psychological Framework. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 5, 1, 73--90.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lynch, P. J. and Horton, S. 2002. Web Style Guide: Basic Design Principles for Creating Web Sites, 2nd ed. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mahlke, S. 2002. Factors influencing the experience of website usage. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'02): Changing the World, Changing Ourselves, Extended Abstracts. ACM Press, New York, 846--847. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mahlke, S. 2006. Studying user experience with digital audio players. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC'06). 358--361. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mccarthy, J. and Wright, P. 2005. Putting ‘felt-life’ at the centre of human-computer interaction (HCI). Cogn. Technol. Work 7, 262--271. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mcknight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. 2002. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 13, 3, 334--359. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mount, M. K., Oh, I.-S., and Burns, M. 2008. Incremental validity of perceptual speed and accuracy over general mental ability. Personn. Psychol. 61, 113--139.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ngo, D. C. L. and Byrne, J. G. 2001. Application of an aesthetic evaluation model to data entry screens. Comput. Hum. Behav. 17, 149--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Norman, D. A. 2004a. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Norman, D. A. 2004b. Introduction to this special section on beauty, goodness, and usability. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19, 311--318. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Park, S. E., Choi, D., and Kim, J. 2005. Visualizing e-brand personality: Exploratory studies on visual attributes and e-brand personalities in Korea. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19, 1, 7--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pickford, R.W. 1972. Psychology and Visual Aesthetics. Hutchinson Educational, London.Google Scholar
- Porteous, J. D. 1996. Environmental Aesthetics: Ideas, Politics, and Planning. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Postrel, V. 2001. Can good looks guarantee product success? The New York Times. July 12.Google Scholar
- Postrel, V. 2002. The Substance of Style. Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
- Redström, J. 2008. Tangled interaction: On the expressiveness of tangible user interfaces. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15, 4, 16-1-- 6-17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rieger, J. W., Braun, C., Bülthoff, H. H., and Gegenfurtner, K. R. 2005. The dynamics of visual pattern masking in natural scene processing: A magnetoencephalography study. J. Vis. 5, 275--286.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rosenzweig, P. 2009. The Halo Effect… and the Eight Other Business Delusions that Deceive Managers. Simon & Schuster, New York. 50--64.Google Scholar
- Schenkman, B. N. and Jönsson, F. U. 2000. Aesthetics and preferences of homepages. Behav. Inf. Technol. 19, 367--377.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schmitt, B. H. and Simonson, A. 1997. Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity and Image. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Schultz, L. 2007. Effects of graphical elements on perceived usefulness of a library. http://www.tarleton.edu/schultz/finalprojectinternetsvcs.htm.Google Scholar
- Sillence, E., Briggs, P., Fishwick, L., and Harris, P. 2004. Timeline analysis: A tool for understanding the selection and rejection of health websites. In Proceedings of the Conference HCI'04: Design for Life. Vol. 2. 113--116.Google Scholar
- Sillence, E., Briggs, P., Harris, P., and Fishwick, L. 2006. A framework for understanding trust factors in Web-based health advice. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Studies 64, 697--713. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simon, H. A. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol. Rev. 63, 129--138.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonderegger, A. and Sauer, J. 2010. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Appl. Ergon. 41, 403--410.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spencer, T. J. and Shuntich, R. 1970. Evidence for an interruption theory of backward masking. J. Experiment. Psychol. 85, 198--203.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sperling, G. 1960. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl. 74, 11, 1--30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sun, H. 2001. Building a culturally-competent corporate Web site: An exploratory study of cultural markers in multilingual Web design. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation. ACM Press, New York, 95--201. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sutcliffe, A. 2001. Heuristic evaluation of website attractiveness and usability. In Interactive Systems: Design, Specification, and Verification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2220. Springer, 183--198. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. 2007. Experimental Design Using ANOVA. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
- Thorndike, E. L. 1920. A consistent error in psycho-logical ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 4, 1, 25--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thüring, M. and Mahlke, S. 2007. Usability, aesthetics, and emotions in human-technology interaction. Int. J. Psychol. 42, 4, 253--264.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tractinsky, N. 1997. Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically cultural and methodological issues. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 115--122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., and Ikar, D. 2000. What is beautiful is usable. Interact. Comput. 13, 127--145.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tractinsky, N., Cokhavi, A., and Kirschenbaum, M. 2004. User ratings and response latencies to evaluate the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of homepages. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS.Google Scholar
- Tractinsky, N., Cokhavi, A., and Kirschenbaum, M. and Sharfi, T. 2006. Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of homepages. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Studies 64, 1071--1083. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tractinsky, N. and Zmiri, D. 2006. Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in HCI. In Aesthetic Computing, P. Fishwick Ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 405--421.Google Scholar
- Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1981. The Framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Sci. 211, 453--458.Google ScholarCross Ref
- van der Heijden, H. 2003. Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in the Netherlands. Inf. Manag. 40, 6, 541--549. Google ScholarDigital Library
- van Rullen, R. and Thorpe, S. J. 2001. The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 4, 454--461. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Verleger, R., Jaskowski, P., Aydemir, A., van de Lubbe, R. H. J., and Groen, M. 2004. Qualitative differences between conscious and non-conscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. J. Experiment. Psychol. Gen. 133, 494--515.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Willians, R. and Tollett, J. 2005. The Non-Designer's Web Book 3rd Ed. Peachpit Press, Berkeley, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Winn, W. 1994. Contributions of perceptual and cognitive processes to the comprehension of graphics. In Comprehension of Graphics, W. Schnotz, and R. W. Kulhavy Eds., Elsvier Science, The Netherlands, 1--27.Google Scholar
- Wong, W. 1987. Principles of Color Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
- Wright, P., Wallace, J., and McCarthy, J. 2008. Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15, 4, 18-1--18-21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yamamoto, M. and Lambert, D. R. 1994. The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation of industrial products. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 11, 309--324.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zajonc, R., 1980. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. Amer. Psychol. 35, 2, 151--175.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zajonc, R. B. 2000. Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition, J. P. Forgas Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 207--220.Google Scholar
- Zajonc, R. B. 2001. Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Direct. Psychol. Sci. 10, 6, 224--228.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zdralek, J. 2003. White space: How much nothing should there be? Unpublished MA thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. www.deziner.com/Papers_files/thesis_content.pdf.Google Scholar
- Zhang, P. and Li, N. 2004. Love at first sight or sustained effect? The role of perceived effective quality on users' cognitive reactions to information technology. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). 283--296.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages
Recommendations
Perceived Trustworthiness Within the Organization: The Moderating Impact of Communication Frequency on Trustor and Trustee Effects
This paper investigates the antecedents of intraorganizational trust and, more specifically, how the frequency of communication between trustor and trustee moderates the impact of these factors on perceived trustworthiness. Data on 157 dyadic ...
Perceived usefulness and usability of weblogs for collaborating learning
HCI'07: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human-computer interaction: applications and servicesUsing a modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), a study was conducted to investigate the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and intention to use weblogs for learning in higher education. Sixty-eight students of a local ...
An expectation-confirmation model of continuance intention to use mobile instant messaging
We examined the factors that affect users' continuance intention to use mobile instant messaging.We expanded the ECM to cover the context of post-consumption stage for MIM services.We redefined perceived usability in the context of mobile instant ...
Comments