skip to main content
10.1145/1961634.1961641acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescarrConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

RecLab: a system for eCommerce recommender research with real data, context and feedback

Published:13 February 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we introduce RecLab, a system designed to enable developers to build and test recommendation algorithms for eCommerce websites. RecLab supports a variety of context and feedback that recommenders can take advantage of to improve the quality of their recommendations. RecLab is unique in that recommenders built on top of RecLab APIs can run in the RichRelevance cloud environment in addition to working with offline data sets. This environment provides on-site recommendations to some of the largest eCommerce sites in existence. By running in the cloud, we are able to avoid the pitfalls that have historically made it difficult for researchers to work with real data and live traffic. We bring code to data, rather than bringing sensitive merchant data to code running outside the cloud. Peer-reviewed recommenders built with RecLab will be chosen to run in the cloud on live data, given their authors unprecedented feedback into their performance in situ.

References

  1. Marshall, Matt. Aggregate Knowledge raises $5M from Kleiner, on a roll. Venture Beat http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/10/aggregate-knowledge-raises-5m-from-kleiner-on-a-roll/(Dec. 10, 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Herlocker, Jonathan L., Konstan, Joseph A., Terveen, Loren G., and Riedl, John T. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 22, 1 (2004), 5--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Gunawardana, Asela and Shani, Guy. A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks. J. Machine Learning Research, 10 (2009), 2935--2962. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Shani, Guy and Gunawardana, Asela. Evaluating Recommendation Systems. In Ricci, Francesco et al., eds., Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Pu, Pearl and Chen, Li and Kumar, Pratyush. Evaluating product search and recommender systems for E-commerce environments. Electronic Commerce Research, 8, 1--2 (2008), 1--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Schafer, J. Ben, Konstan, Joseph A., and Riedl, John. E-Commerce Recommendation Applications. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 5, 1--2 (2001), 115--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kent, Allen, Berry, Madeline M., Luehrs, Fred U., and Perry, J. W. Machine literature searching VIII. Operational criteria for designing information retrieval systems. American Documentation, 6, 2 (1955), 93--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ziegler, Cai-Nicolas and McNee, Sean M. and Konstan, Joseph A. and Lausen, Georg. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In Proc. 14th int'l conf. on World Wide Web (2005), ACM, 22--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Akiyama, Takayuki, Obara, Kiyohiro, and Tanizaki, Masaaki. Proposal and Evaluation of Serendipitous Recommendation Method Using General Unexpectedness. In Proc. Workshop on the Practical Use of Recommender Systems, Algorithms and Technologies (2010), CEUR, 3--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zheng, Hua, Wang, Dong, Zhang, Qi, Li, Hang, and Yang, Tinghao. Do clicks measure recommendation relevancy?: an empirical user study. In Proc. of the Fourth ACM Conf. on Recommender Systems (2010), ACM, 249--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jones, Nicolas and Pu, Pearl. User Technology Adoption Issues in Recommender Systems. In Proc. Networking and Electronic Commerce Research Conference (NAEC) (2007), 379--394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pu, Pearl and Chen, Li. A User-Centric Evaluation Framework of Recommender Systems. In Proc. ACM RecSys 2010 Workshop on User-Centric Evaluation of Recommender Systems and Their Interfaces (UCERSTI) (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Adomavicius, Gediminas and Tuzhilin, Alexander. Context-Aware Recommender Systems. In Ricci, Francesco et al., eds., Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Anand, Sarabjot Singh and Mobasher, Bamshad. Contextual Recommendation. In Berendt, B. et al., eds., From Web to Social Web: Discovering and Deploying User and Content Profiles. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jäschke, Robert, Eisterlehner, Folke, Hotho, Andreas, and Stumme, Gerd. Testing and Evaluating Tag Recommenders in a Live System. In Workshop on Knowledge Discovery, Data Mining, and Machine Learning (2009), 44--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Naughton, Robin and Lin, Xia. Recommender Systems: Investigating the Impact of Recommendations on User Choices and Behaviors. In Proc. ACM RecSys 2010 Wkshp on User-Centric Evaluation of Recommender Systems and Their Interfaces (UCERSTI) (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Castagnos, Sylvain, Jones, Nicolas, and Pu, Pearl. Eye-tracking product recommenders' usage. In Proc. Fourth ACM Conf. on Recommender Systems (2010), ACM, 28--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ricci, Francesco et al., eds. Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dahlen, Brent J., Konstan, Joseph, Herlocker, Jon, Good, Nathaniel, Borchers, Al, and Riedl, John. Jump-Starting MovieLens: User Benefits of Starting a Collaborative Filtering System with "Dead Date". Technical Report 98--017, University Of Minnesota, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Herlocker, Jonathan L., Konstan, Joseph A., Borchers, Al, and Riedl, John. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR) (1999), ACM, 230--237. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lohr, Steve. Netflix Cancels Contest After Concerns Are Raised About Privacy. New York Times (March 12, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Zeller, Tom. AOL Technology Chief Quits After Data Release. New York Times (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Selinger, David, Kohn, Tyler, Liu, Wendy, and Burk, Scott. Resolving the Inherent Conflicts in Academic-Commercial Data Mining Collaboration. In Workshop on Data Mining for Business Applications (2006), ACM, 81--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Linden, Greg. Slides from my talk at Stanford. Geeking with Greg http://glinden.blogspot.com/2006/12/slides-from-my-talk-at-stanford.html (December 4, 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Farber, Dan. Between the Lines. Google's Marissa Mayer: Speed wins http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/googles-marissa-mayer-speed-wins/3925 (November 9, 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Apache License, Version 2.0 http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Dean, Jeffrey and Ghemawat, Sanjay. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. In 6th Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation (2004), USENIX, 137--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zhao, Zhi-Dan and Shang, Ming-sheng. User-Based Collaborative-Filtering Recommendation Algorithms on Hadoop. In Proc. Third Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2010), 478--481. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Liu, Chao, Yang, Hung-chih, Fan, Jinliang, He, Li-Wei, and Wang, Yi-Min. Distributed nonnegative matrix factorization for web-scale dyadic data analysis on mapreduce. In Proc. Intl. conf. on WWW (2010), 681--690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. snakeyaml http://code.google.com/p/snakeyaml/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Subversion http://subversion.tigris.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Apache Maven Project http://maven.apache.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarwar, Badrul, Karypis, George, Konstan, Joseph, and Reidl, John. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proc. 10th intl. conf. on WWW (2001), 285--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hadoop http://hadoop.apache.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Hadoop MapReduce http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. The Official YAML Website http://www.yaml.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Lemire, Daniel and Maclachlan, Anna. Slope One Predictors for Online Rating-Based Collaborative Filtering. In Proc. SIAM Data Mining (SDM) (2005), SIAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. RecLab: a system for eCommerce recommender research with real data, context and feedback

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CaRR '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Context-awareness in Retrieval and Recommendation
          February 2011
          57 pages
          ISBN:9781450306256
          DOI:10.1145/1961634

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 February 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader