skip to main content
10.1145/1962300.1962390acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

WikiTherapist

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivation -- This paper describes a platform that can be used by therapists to easily create treatment programs for ASD patients based on robotic systems.

Research approach -- Through extensive collaboration with treatment clinics, the needs and requirements of therapists are analysed and implemented in several design stages.

Design -- The basis of the platform is a combination of the humanoid mobile robot NAO (Figure 1) with a visual programming environment TiViPE. The end-user qualities of TiViPE extended with learning by imitation programming techniques allows therapists to create therapy programs without the need for extensive programming skills.

Take away message -- The successful introduction of autistic treatment programs involving robotics requires the ability of therapists to create and adapt the therapy to patient specific needs.

References

  1. Barakova, E. I., Gillesen, J., & Feijs, L. (2009). Social training of autistic children with interactive intelligent agents. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 8(1), 23--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Colton, M. B., Ricks, D. J., Goodrich, M. A., Dariush, B., Fujimura, K., Fujiki, M. (2009). Toward Therapist-in-the-Loop Assistive Robotics for Children with Autism and Specific Language Impairment. In AISB New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction Symposium. Edinburgh, Scotland, 6--10 April.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dautenhahn, K., & Werry, I. (2004). Towards interactive robots in autism therapy. Pragmatics & Cognition, 1(12), 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Feil-Seifer, D. & Mataric', M. (2008). Robot-assisted therapy for children with autism spectrum disorders. In Proceedings of IDC '08, (Chicago, Illinois, June 11--13, 2008). ACM, New York, NY, 49--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lourens, T., & Barakova E.I. (2009). Retrieving Emotion from Motion Analysis: In a Real Time Parallel Framework for Robots. In C.S. Leung, M. Lee, and J.H. Chan (Eds.): ICONIP 2009, Part II, LNCS 5864, pp. 430--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mari, M., Castiello, U., Marks, D., Marraffa, C., & Prior, M. (2003). The reach-to-grasp movement in children with autism spectrum disorder. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 358(1430), 393--403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Masterton, B. A., & Biederman, G. B. (1983). Proprioceptive versus visual control in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 13(2), 141--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Scassellati, B. (2005). Quantitative metrics of social response for autism diagnosis. Proc. 14th IEEE Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 585--590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Schaal, S. (1999). Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6):233--242Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. WikiTherapist

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ECCE '10: Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
            August 2010
            380 pages
            ISBN:9781605589466
            DOI:10.1145/1962300

            Copyright © 2010 Authors

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 August 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader