skip to main content
10.1145/1963405.1963456acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automatic construction of a context-aware sentiment lexicon: an optimization approach

Published: 28 March 2011 Publication History

Abstract

The explosion of Web opinion data has made essential the need for automatic tools to analyze and understand people's sentiments toward different topics. In most sentiment analysis applications, the sentiment lexicon plays a central role. However, it is well known that there is no universally optimal sentiment lexicon since the polarity of words is sensitive to the topic domain. Even worse, in the same domain the same word may indicate different polarities with respect to different aspects. For example, in a laptop review, "large" is negative for the battery aspect while being positive for the screen aspect. In this paper, we focus on the problem of learning a sentiment lexicon that is not only domain specific but also dependent on the aspect in context given an unlabeled opinionated text collection. We propose a novel optimization framework that provides a unified and principled way to combine different sources of information for learning such a context-dependent sentiment lexicon. Experiments on two data sets (hotel reviews and customer feedback surveys on printers) show that our approach can not only identify new sentiment words specific to the given domain but also determine the different polarities of a word depending on the aspect in context. In further quantitative evaluation, our method is proved to be effective in constructing a high quality lexicon by comparing with a human annotated gold standard. In addition, using the learned context-dependent sentiment lexicon improved the accuracy in an aspect-level sentiment classification task.

References

[1]
K. T. Chan and I. King. Let's tango - finding the right couple for feature-opinion association in sentiment analysis. In PAKDD '09, pages 741--748, 2009.
[2]
Y. Choi and C. Cardie. Adapting a polarity lexicon using integer linear programming for domain-specific sentiment classification. In EMNLP '09, pages 590--598, 2009.
[3]
H. T. Dang. Overview of the tac 2008 opinion question answering and summarization tasks. In TAC, 2008.
[4]
X. Ding, B. Liu, and P. S. Yu. A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In WSDM '08, pages 231--240.
[5]
A. Hassan and D. Radev. Identifying text polarity using random walks. In ACL '10, pages 395--403.
[6]
V. Hatzivassiloglou and K. R. McKeown. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In EACL '97, pages 174--181, 1997.
[7]
V. Hatzivassiloglou and J. M. Wiebe. Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. In COLING '00, pages 299--305, 2000.
[8]
L. Hoang, J.-T. Lee, Y.-I. Song, and H.-C. Rim. Combining local and global resources for constructing an error-minimized opinion word dictionary. In PRICAI '08, pages 688--697, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag.
[9]
V. Jijkoun, M. de Rijke, and W. Weerkamp. Generating focused topic-specific sentiment lexicons. In ACL '10, pages 585--594, 2010.
[10]
Y. Jo and A. Oh. Aspect and sentiment unification model for online review analysis. In WSDM '11.
[11]
H. Kanayama and T. Nasukawa. Fully automatic lexicon expansion for domain-oriented sentiment analysis. In EMNLP '06, pages 355--363, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[12]
Y. Lu, C. Zhai, and N. Sundaresan. Rated aspect summarization of short comments. In 18th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2009), April 2009.
[13]
Q. Mei, X. Ling, M. Wondra, H. Su, and C. Zhai. Topic sentiment mixture: modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In WWW '07, pages 171--180. ACM.
[14]
S. Mohammad, C. Dunne, and B. Dorr. Generating high-coverage semantic orientation lexicons from overtly marked words and a thesaurus. In EMNLP '09, pages 599--608, 2009.
[15]
S.-H. Na, Y. Lee, S.-H. Nam, and J.-H. Lee. Improving opinion retrieval based on query-specific sentiment lexicon. In ECIR '09, pages 734--738, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag.
[16]
A. Neviarouskaya, H. Prendinger, and M. Ishizuka. Sentiful: Generating a reliable lexicon for sentiment analysis. In ACII, pages 1 --6, sep. 2009.
[17]
I. Ounis, M. D. Rijke, C. Macdonald, G. Mishne, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the trec 2006 blog track. In TREC. NIST, 2006.
[18]
B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis, volume 2(1-2) of Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval. Now Publ., 2008.
[19]
P. D. Turney and M. L. Littman. Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 21(4):315--346, 2003.
[20]
H. Wang, Y. Lu, and C. Zhai. Latent aspect rating analysis on review text data: a rating regression approach. In KDD '10, pages 783--792, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[21]
J. Yi, T. Nasukawa, R. C. Bunescu, and W. Niblack. Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. In Proceedings of ICDM 2003, pages 427--434, 2003.
[22]
H. Yu and V. Hatzivassiloglou. Towards answering opinion questions: separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In EMNLP '03, pages 129--136, 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)A survey on pragmatic processing techniquesInformation Fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102712114(102712)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)Advancing E-Commerce Authenticity: A Novel Fusion Approach Based on Deep Learning and Aspect Features for Detecting False ReviewsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.343591612(116055-116070)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)RAKCR: Reviews sentiment-aware based knowledge graph convolutional networks for Personalized RecommendationExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123403248(123403)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '11: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web
March 2011
840 pages
ISBN:9781450306324
DOI:10.1145/1963405
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 March 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. opinion mining
  2. optimization
  3. sentiment analysis
  4. sentiment lexicon

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WWW '11
WWW '11: 20th International World Wide Web Conference
March 28 - April 1, 2011
Hyderabad, India

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)47
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)A survey on pragmatic processing techniquesInformation Fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102712114(102712)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)Advancing E-Commerce Authenticity: A Novel Fusion Approach Based on Deep Learning and Aspect Features for Detecting False ReviewsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.343591612(116055-116070)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)RAKCR: Reviews sentiment-aware based knowledge graph convolutional networks for Personalized RecommendationExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123403248(123403)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2024)Literacy in the Time of Artificial IntelligenceReading Research Quarterly10.1002/rrq.59160:1Online publication date: 23-Nov-2024
  • (2023)Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Survey Data: A Comparison of ChatGPT and Fine-tuned OPT Against Widely Used Sentiment Analysis Tools (Preprint)JMIR Mental Health10.2196/50150Online publication date: 21-Jun-2023
  • (2023)An Interpretable Preference Learning Model Admitting Dynamic and Context-Dependent PreferencesSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4606645Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Generating Usage-related Questions for Preference Elicitation in Conversational Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/3629981Online publication date: 27-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Modeling Self-Representation Label Correlations for Textual Aspects and Emojis RecommendationIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems10.1109/TNNLS.2022.317133534:12(10762-10774)Online publication date: Dec-2023
  • (2023)Arabic Text Detection Using Rough Set Theory: Designing a Novel ApproachIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.327827211(68428-68438)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Explainable recommendations with nonnegative matrix factorizationArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-023-10619-956:S3(3927-3955)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media