skip to main content
10.1145/1963405.1963479acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

We know who you followed last summer: inferring social link creation times in twitter

Published:28 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Understanding a network's temporal evolution appears to require multiple observations of the graph over time. These often expensive repeated crawls are only able to answer questions about what happened from observation to observation, and not what happened before or between network snapshots. Contrary to this picture, we propose a method for Twitter's social network that takes a single static snapshot of network edges and user account creation times to accurately infer when these edges were formed. This method can be exact in theory, and we demonstrate empirically for a large subset of Twitter relationships that it is accurate to within a few hours in practice.

We study users who have a very large number of edges or who are recommended by Twitter. We examine the graph formed by these nearly 1,800 Twitter celebrities and their 862 million edges in detail, showing that a single static snapshot can give novel insights about Twitter's evolution. We conclude from this analysis that real-world events and changes to Twitter's interface for recommending users strongly influence network growth.

References

  1. About Twitter API. http://dev.twitter.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anil Dash's experience on the suggested users list. http://dashes.com/anil/2009/12/life-on-the-list.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. P. Borgatti, K. M. Carley, and D. Krackhardt. On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks, 28:124--136, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51(4):661--703, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Cosley, D. P. Huttenlocher, J. M. Kleinberg, X. Lan, and S. Suri. Sequential influence models in social networks. In ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. N. Dorogovtsev and J. F. F. Mendes. Evolution of networks. Advances in Physics, 51:1079--1187, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. A. Golder and S. Yardi. Structural predictors of tie formation in twitter: Transitivity and mutuality. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero, and F. Wu. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series, December 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, pages 56--65, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. H. Jeong, Z. Néda, and A. L. Barabási. Measuring preferential attachment in evolving networks. Europhysics Letters, 61(4):567--572, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. B. Krishnamurthy, P. Gill, and M. Arlitt. A few chirps about twitter. In WOSP '08: Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks, pages 19--24, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Kumar, J. Novak, and A. Tomkins. Structure and evolution of online social networks. In KDD '06: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 611--617, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media. In WWW'10: Proceedings of the 19th internation conference on World Wide Web, pages 591--600, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Microscopic evolution of social networks. In KDD '08: Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 462--470, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, 1(1), March 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Mislove, M. Marcon, K. P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In IMC '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pages 29--42, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. MTV Video Music Awards 2009. http://www.mtv.com/ontv/vma/2009/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. E. J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45:167--256, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Oprah Tries Twitter, Crowns Ashton King of It. http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/04/17/oprah-tries-twitter-crowns-ashton-king-of-it/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Redner. Citation statistics from 110 years of Physical Review. Physics Today, 58:49--54, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. Romero and J. Kleinberg. The directed closure process in hybrid social-information networks, with an analysis of link formation on twitter. In Proc. 4th Internation AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. The Newest Way to Game Twitter Fake Followers. http://brooksbayne.com/post/79132853/the-newest-way-to-game-twitter-fake-followers\#comment-6353220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Twitter blog post: Discovering Who To Follow. http://blog.twitter.com/2010/07/discovering-who-to-follow.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Twitter blog post: Suggested Users. http://blog.twitter.com/2009/03/suggested-users.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Twitter blog post: The Power of Suggestion. http://blog.twitter.com/2010/01/power-of-suggestions.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Who Does Twitter Love? Breaking Down The Twitter Suggested Users List. http://searchengineland.com/who-does-twitter-love-breaking-down-the-twitter-suggested-users-list-22640.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. We know who you followed last summer: inferring social link creation times in twitter

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '11: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web
      March 2011
      840 pages
      ISBN:9781450306324
      DOI:10.1145/1963405

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 March 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader