Kristen Shinohara
Jacob O. Wobbrock
ABSTRACT
Few research studies focus on how the use of assistive technologies is affected by social interaction among people. We present an interview study of 20 individuals to determine how assistive technology use is affected by social and professional contexts and interactions. We found that specific assistive devices sometimes marked their users as having disabilities; that functional access took priority over feeling self-conscious when using assistive technologies; and that two misperceptions pervaded assistive technology use: (1) that assistive devices could functionally eliminate a disability, and (2) that people with disabilities would be helpless without their devices. Our findings provide further evidence that accessibility should be built into mainstream technologies. When this is not feasible, assistive devices should incorporate cutting edge technologies and strive to be designed for social acceptability, a new design approach we propose here.
- National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped. http://www.loc.gov/nls/. September 2010.Google Scholar
- Bispo, R. and Branco, R. (2008). Designing out stigma: the role of objects in the construction of disabled people's identity. Dare to Desire: 6th Int'l Design & Emotion Conf. Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Bispo, R. and Branco, V. (2009). Designing out stigma: the potential of contradictory symbolic imagery. Proc. Include 2009. London.Google Scholar
- Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. and Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
- Cook, A. M. and Hussey, S. M. (2002). Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice. Second Ed. Mosby, Inc., St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things. Cambridge Univ. Press, NY.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Denning, T., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Gill, B. T., Kohno, T. and Maisel, W. H. (2010). Patients, pacemakers, and implantable defibrillators: human values and security for wireless implantable medical devices. Proc. CHI '10. Atlanta, GA, ACM, 917--926. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dijksterhuis, A. and Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Persp. on Psych. Sci. 1 (2), 95--109.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edwards, A. D. N. (1995). Extra-Ordinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities. Univ. of Cambridge Press, Cambridge. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elliott, G. C., Ziegler, H. L., Altman, B. M. and Scott, D. R. (1982). Understanding stigma. Deviant Behavior. 3 (3), 275--300.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fine, M. and Asch, A. (1988). Disability Beyond Stigma: Social Interaction, Discrimination, and Activism. Journal of Social Issues. 44 (1), 3--21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine Publishing Co, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma; notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
- Gray, D. B., Quatrano, L. A. and Lieberman, M. L. (1998). Designing and using assistive technology: the human perspective. P. H. Brookes Pub. Co., Baltimore.Google Scholar
- Jacobson, S. (2010). Overcoming Stigma Associated with Assistive Devices. 7th Int'l Conf. on Design and Emotion. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Pape, T. L.-B., Kim, J. and Weiner, B. (2002). The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disability and Rehabilitation. 24 (1/2/3), 5--20.Google Scholar
- Parette, P. and Scherer, M. (2004). Assistive Technology Use and Stigma. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities. 39 (3), 217--226.Google Scholar
- Phillips, B. and Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive technology: the official journal of RESNA. 5 (1), 36--45.Google Scholar
- Pullin, G. (2009). Design meets disability. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Riemer-Reiss, M. L. and Wacker, R. R. (2000). Factors Associated with Assistive Technology Discontinuance Among Individuals with Disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation. 66 (3), 44--50.Google Scholar
- Scherer, M. J. (1993). Living in the state of stuck: how technologies affect the lives of people with disabilities. Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Shinohara, K. and Tenenberg, J. (2009). A blind person's interactions with technology. Comm. ACM. 52 (8), 58--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions
Recommendations
(In)Visibility in Disability and Assistive Technology
In this article, we present a meta-analysis of research examining visibility of disability. In interrogating the issue of visibility and invisibility in the design of assistive technologies, we open a discussion about how perceptions surrounding ...
Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology
With the recent influx of smartphones, tablets, and wearables such as watches and glasses, personal interactive device use is increasingly visible and commonplace in public and social spaces. Assistive Technologies (ATs) used by people with disabilities ...
Designing Wheelchair-Based Movement Games
Special Issue (Part 1) of Papers from ASSETS 2013People using wheelchairs have access to fewer sports and other physically stimulating leisure activities than nondisabled persons, and often lead sedentary lifestyles that negatively influence their health. While motion-based video games have ...
Comments