skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979277acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Utility of human-computer interactions: toward a science of preference measurement

Published: 07 May 2011 Publication History

Abstract

The success of a computer system depends upon a user choosing it, but the field of Human-Computer Interaction has little ability to predict this user choice. We present a new method that measures user choice, and quantifies it as a measure of utility. Our method has two core features. First, it introduces an economic definition of utility, one that we can operationalize through economic experiments. Second, we employ a novel method of crowdsourcing that enables the collection of thousands of economic judgments from real users.

References

[1]
Ariely, D. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. HarperCollins. 2008.
[2]
Ben-Bassat, T., Meyer, J., and Tractinsky, N. Economic and Subjective Measures of the Perceived Value of Aesthetics and Usability. in ACM Transactions of Computer-Human Interaction, 13 (2). 2006. 210--234.
[3]
Cooper, S., Khatib, F., Treuille, A., Barbero, J., Lee, J-H., Beenen, M., Leaver-Fay, A., Baker, D., Popovic, Z. & Foldit players. Predicting Protein Structures with a Multiplayer Online Game. Nature 466, 756--760.
[4]
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. Macmillan. 1990.
[5]
Grudin, J. Utility and Usability: Research Issues and Development Contexts. Interacting with Computers, 4, (1992) 209--217.
[6]
Grudin J. and Wang Laboratories. Adapting a Psychophysical Method to Measure Performance and Preference Tradeoffs in Human-Computer Interaction. in Proc. INTERACT (1984). 737--741.
[7]
Heer, J. and Bostock, M. Crowdsourcing Graphical Perception: Using Mechanical Turk to Assess Visualization Design. in Proc. CHI 2010. (2000).
[8]
Horton, J.J. and Chilton, L. The Labor Economics of Paid Crowdsourcing. in Proc. ACM Electronic Commerce 2010. (2010).
[9]
Ipeirotis, P.G. Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk Marketplace. New York University Report no. CeDER-10-04. 2010.
[10]
Ipeirotis, P.G. The Explosion of Micro-Crowdsourcing Services. http://behind-the-enemy-lines.blogspot.com/2010/10/explosion-of-micro-crowdsourcing.html.
[11]
Ipeirotis, P.G. Provost, F. and Wang, J. Quality Management on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of KDD-HCOMP (2010).
[12]
Ipeirotis, P.G. Why People Participate on Mechanical Turk, Now Tabulated. http://behind-the-enemy-lines.blogspot.com/2008/09/why-people-participate-on-mechanical.htm.
[13]
Kittur, A.; Chi, E. H. ; Suh, B. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008). 453--456.
[14]
Klein, J.P. Survival Analysis. Springer, 2003.
[15]
Kohavi, R. Practical Guide to Controlled Experiments on the Web: Listen to Your Customers not to the HiPPO. in Proc KDD 2007. (2007.
[16]
MacKenzie, S. Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool. in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), 1992 7(1), 91--139.
[17]
Malone, T.W. Heuristics for Designing Enjoyable User Interfaces: Lessons from Computer Games. in CHI 1982. ACM Press (1982).
[18]
Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.
[19]
Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M.S., Zaldivar, A. and Tomlinson, B. Who are the Crowdworkers? Shifting Demographics in Mechanical Turk. alt.chi '10, ACM Press.
[20]
Simon, H.A. "Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World. in Martin Greenberger," Computers, Communication, and the Public Interest, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press (1971).
[21]
Smith, A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Methuen and Co., Ltd., ed. Edwin Cannan, 1904.
[22]
Van Ahn, L. and Dabbish, L. Labeling Images with a Computer Game. in Proc. CHI 2004. ACM Press (2004).
[23]
Varian, H.R. Microeconomic Analysis. Norton, 1984.
[24]
Wilson, E. Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1927. 22: 209--212.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Breaking down barriers to warning technology adoption: usability and usefulness of a messenger app warning boti-com10.1515/icom-2024-0067Online publication date: 26-Feb-2025
  • (2024)If in a Crowdsourced Data Annotation Pipeline, a GPT-4Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642834(1-25)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Formulating Explainable UI/UX for Bank ATM and Analytic Performance of HCI2024 International Conference on Emerging Techniques in Computational Intelligence (ICETCI)10.1109/ICETCI62771.2024.10704149(338-344)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Utility of human-computer interactions: toward a science of preference measurement
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2011
        3530 pages
        ISBN:9781450302289
        DOI:10.1145/1978942
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 07 May 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. HCI
        2. crowdsourcing
        3. economics
        4. evaluation
        5. mechanical turk
        6. user-interface
        7. utility

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        CHI '11
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate 410 of 1,532 submissions, 27%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI 2025
        ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 26 - May 1, 2025
        Yokohama , Japan

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)58
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
        Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2025)Breaking down barriers to warning technology adoption: usability and usefulness of a messenger app warning boti-com10.1515/icom-2024-0067Online publication date: 26-Feb-2025
        • (2024)If in a Crowdsourced Data Annotation Pipeline, a GPT-4Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642834(1-25)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Formulating Explainable UI/UX for Bank ATM and Analytic Performance of HCI2024 International Conference on Emerging Techniques in Computational Intelligence (ICETCI)10.1109/ICETCI62771.2024.10704149(338-344)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2024
        • (2024)Analyzing Novice and Competent Programmers' Problem-Solving Behaviors Using an Automated Evaluation SystemScience of Computer Programming10.1016/j.scico.2024.103138(103138)Online publication date: May-2024
        • (2023)Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-MakingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35796057:CSCW1(1-38)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
        • (2023)A Framework to Enhance User Experience of Older Adults With Speech-Based Intelligent Personal AssistantsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.323015111(16683-16699)Online publication date: 2023
        • (2022)The interplay between perceived usability and quality in visual design for tablet game interfacesJournal of Usability Studies10.5555/3542834.354283617:3(89-116)Online publication date: 1-May-2022
        • (2022)Understanding User Perceptions of Response Delays in Crowd-Powered Conversational SystemsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35557656:CSCW2(1-42)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
        • (2022)Select or Suggest? Reinforcement Learning-based Method for High-Accuracy Target Selection on TouchscreensProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517472(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
        • (2022)Adaptive InteractionundefinedOnline publication date: 4-Mar-2022
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media