skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979292acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Practices in the creative reuse of e-waste

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

E-waste is a generic term embracing various forms of electric and electronic equipment that is loosely discarded, surplus, obsolete, or broken [27]. When e-waste is improperly discarded as trash, there are predictable negative impacts on the environment and human health. Existing e-waste solutions range from designing for reuse to fabricating with eco-friendly decomposable materials to more radical critiques of current practices surrounding capitalism and consumerism. Complementary to theses efforts, this paper presents an accessible reuse framework that encourages creativity while maintaining personal ownership of e-waste. Through a series of online surveys of existing personal e-waste stockpiling behaviors combined with observational studies of existing reuse practices, we developed a design reuse vocabulary: materials, shapes, and operations to enable wide ranging and creative reuse of obsolete electronics by everyday people. We operationalized this vocabulary and evaluated its legibility and usefulness. As a result, we derived a novel reuse composition framework: reuse as-is, remake, and remanufacture designed to be accessible and to have broader impact in encouraging creative reuse across a wide range of e-waste types beyond those specifically used in our study. We believe these frameworks will be a catalyst for the creative reuse of e-waste.

References

  1. Alameda County Computer Resource Center, http://www.acccrc.org, 2010 Septempber.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Australia Environmental Protection Agency (2005), Household Electrical and Electronic, Waste Benchmark Survey 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blevis. E. (2007), Sustainable interaction design in HCI. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press, 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Max J. I. Fiksdahl-King and Angel, A. (1977) Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Consumer Electronics Association (2008), Market Research Report: Trends in CE Reuse, Recycle and Removal, April 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, T. (2005), Slower Consumption Reflections on Product Life Spans and the "Throwaway Society". Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1-2): 51--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Creusen M. E. H & Jan P. L. Schoormans (2005), The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice, Journal of Product Innovation Management 22(1): 63--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Dourish. P. (2010), HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politic, In Proc. the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fogg, B. J. Grudin, J. Nielsen, J. & Card, S. (2002), Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, Science & Technology Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gregson, N. Metcalfe, A. & Crewe, L. (2007), Identity mobility and the throwaway society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2007, 25 No. 4:682--700.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Heimbuch, J. (2010), Consumers In Emerging Markets Outpace Americans in Buying Electronics, Especially Greener Gadgets, Science & Technology 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Horst W. J. Rittel and Melvin M. W. (1973), Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang, E. M. & Truong, K. N. (2008), SUSTAINABLY OURS-Situated Sustainability for Mobile Phones. Interactions-New York, 2008. 15(2): 16--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Huang, E. M. & Truong, K. N. (2008), Breaking the disposable technology paradigm: opportunities for sustainable interaction design for mobile phones. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press, 323--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Huh, J., Nam, K. and Sharma, N. (2010) Finding the Lost Treasure: Understanding Reuse of Used Computing Devices, In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press, 1875--1878. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Makezine http://www.makezine.com, 2010 August.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mankoff J. C., Blevis, E., Borning, E., Friedman, B., Fussell, S. R., Hasbrouck, J., Woodruff, A. and Phoebe S. (2007), Environmental sustainability and interaction, Ext. Abstracts CHI 2007, ACM Press, 2121--2124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nathan L. P., Blevis E., Friedman B., Hasbrouck J., & Sengers P. (2008), Beyond the hype: sustainability & HCI. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2008, ACM Press, 2273--2276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. National Safety Council Electronic Product Recovery and Recycling Baseline Report. Washington D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Odom W., Pierce J., Stolterman E., and Blevis E. (2009), Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press, 1053--1062. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Paulos E., Forth M., Satchell S., Kim Y., Dourish P., and Choi J. (2008), Ubiquitous Sustainability: Citizen Science & Activism. In Proc Ubicomp '08 Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Piper Jaffray Companies, http://www.piperjaffray.com/ 2010 June.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Solid Waste District http://www.solidwastedistrict.com 2010 August.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wakkary, R. & Tanenbaum, K. (2009), A sustainable identity in HCI. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press. 365--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wakkary, R. & Maestri, L. (2007), The resourcefulness of everyday design. In Proc. Creativity and Cognition 2007, ACM Press, 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Widmer, R., Oswald-Krapf H., Sinha-Khetriwal D., et al. (2005), Global perspectives on e-waste. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2005; 25; 436--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen_science 2010 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J. and Augustin, S. (2008), A bright green perspective on sustainable choices, In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press, 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Verbeek, P. P. (2005), What Things Do - Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. The Pennsylvania State Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. US Environmental Protection Agency, Municipal Solid Waste Generation Recycling and Disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2007, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. US Environmental Protection Agency (2007), Fact sheet: Management of Electronic waste in the US 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Practices in the creative reuse of e-waste
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2011
      3530 pages
      ISBN:9781450302289
      DOI:10.1145/1978942

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate410of1,532submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader