skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979297acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Opportunities exist: continuous discovery of places to perform activities

Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

A rich cognitive map of a space can enhance the individual's experience within the space. However, cognitive maps develop gradually through repeated experience; and because of this, on-demand mobile search services (e.g., Google Maps, Yelp) are often used to compensate for missing knowledge. In this work, we developed and evaluated a context-aware place discovery application called Opportunities Exist to assist in the acquisition of spatial knowledge and meaning. The application differs from traditional search in that places are discovered using an activity (e.g., drink coffee, sit in the sun) and the discovery process runs continuously, maintaining a history of places the user can perform her activities as she goes about her day. We conducted a 4-week deployment in two North American cities. The results show that users were able to discover new places to perform their activities in familiar spaces and learned to associate new activities with familiar places. In addition, participants leveraged the application to perform activities opportunistically, and used continuous place discovery as an opportunistic reminder of routines they wanted to break out of or resume.

References

  1. Agre, P. E. Changing places: contexts of awareness in computing. Human-Computer Interaction 16, 2 (2001), 177--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brown, P. J. The stick-e document: a framework for creating context-aware applications. Electronic Publishing 8, 2 & 3 (1996), 259--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Church, K., Neumann, J., Cherubini, M. and Oliver, N. The "map trap"?: an evaluation of map versus text-based interfaces for location-based mobile search services. In Proc. WWW 2010, ACM Press (2010), 261--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Church, K. and Smyth, B. Understanding the intent behind mobile information needs. In Proc. IUI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 247--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cohen, S. L. and Cohen, R. The role of activity in spatial cognition. In The development of spatial cognition, R. Cohen, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1985, 199--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Couclelis, H., Golledge, R. G., Gale, N. and Tobler, W. Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology 7, 2 (1987), 99--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dearman, D., Kellar, M. and Truong, K. N. An examination of daily information needs and sharing opportunities. In Proc. CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008), 679--688. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dearman, D. and Truong, K. N. Identifying the activities supported by locations using community-authored content. In Proc. Ubicomp 2010, ACM Press (2010), 23--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dey, A. Understanding and using context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5, 1 (2001), 4--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dourish, P. Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing. Human-Computer Interaction 16, 2 (2001), 229--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Downs, R. M. and Stea, D. Cognitive maps and spatial behaviour: process and products. In Image and environment: cognitive mapping and spatial behavior, R. M. Downs and D. Stea, Eds. Aldine, Chicago, IL,, 1973, 8--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonzalez, M. C., Hidalgo, C. A. and Barabasi, A.-L. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453 (5 June 2008), 779--782.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Griswold, W. G., Shanahan, P., Brown, S. W., Boyer, R., Ratto, M., Shapiro, R. B. and Truong, T. M. ActiveCampus: experiments in community-oriented ubiquitous computing. Computer 37, 10 (2004), 73--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Harrison, S. and Dourish, P. Re-place-ing space: the role of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proc. CSCW 1996, ACM Press (1996), 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Heimonen, T. Information needs and practices of active mobile internet users. In Proc. Mobility 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Herman, J. F. Children's cognitive maps for large-scale spaces: effects on exploration, direction, and repeated experience. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 29, 1 (1980), 126--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kamvar, M., Kellar, M., Patel, R. and Xu, Y. Computers and iPhones and mobile phones, oh my!: a logs-based comparison of search users on different devices. In Proc. of WWW 2009, ACM Press (2009), 801--810. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lynch, K. The image of the city. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nardi, B. A. Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995, 69--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Shanahan, P. and Griswold, W. G. Inferring the everyday task capabilities of locations. In Proc. of LoCa 2007, Springer (2007), 157--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Siegel, A. W. and White, S. H. The development of spatial representations of large-scale environment. In Advances in child development and behavior, H. W. Resse, Eds. Academic Press, New York, NY, 1975, 9--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sohn, T., Li, K. A., Griswold, W. G. and Holland, J. A diary study of mobile information needs. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 433--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sohn, T., Li, K. A., Lee, G., Smith, I., Scott, J. and Griswold, W. G. Place-Its: a study of location-based reminders on mobile phones. In Proc. Ubicomp 2005, Springer (2005), 232--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stevens, A. and Coupe, P. Distortion in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology 10, 4 (1978), 422--437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Opportunities exist: continuous discovery of places to perform activities
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2011
        3530 pages
        ISBN:9781450302289
        DOI:10.1145/1978942

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 May 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate410of1,532submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader